Highway geometric design: the recommended method used to set out a lemniscate transition curve in the field is which of the following?

Introduction / Context:
Lemniscate transition curves are used in highway and railway design when a more gradual change in curvature than a simple spiral is desired. Setting out such curves demands a method that matches their polar form so that the field layout remains accurate and efficient.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A lemniscate has a mathematical form naturally described in polar coordinates.
• Surveyors need a practical method to mark points along the curve from a reference tangent point.
• Options include offset and deflection-angle methods.

Concept / Approach:
Because the radius vector and polar angle vary together along a lemniscate, the polar deflection-angle method provides a direct relationship between angle set on a theodolite and the distance along the radius vector, giving better fidelity than simple perpendicular or radial offsets that suit circular or parabolic forms.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Comparing coordinates obtained via polar deflection with analytical curve equations confirms that the points lie accurately on the intended lemniscate.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Perpendicular or radial offset tables are more suitable for circular or parabolic curves; plain “deflection angles” without polar formulation do not fully exploit the lemniscate’s polar nature.

Common Pitfalls:
Using offset methods calibrated for spirals or circles can introduce fitting errors on a lemniscate; maintaining angular accuracy is crucial.

Final Answer:
polar deflection angles.