Ring & Johnson Counters — These are widely used shift-register-based counters (sequence generators), not “uncommon” circuits. Evaluate the statement.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction:
Ring counters and Johnson (twisted-ring) counters are classic sequence generators built from shift registers. They appear in timing generators, state machines with simple decoding, LED chasers, and clock-division applications. The claim that they are “uncommon” is inaccurate in both education and industry contexts.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Ring counter: a single 1 circulates through a ring of flip-flops.
  • Johnson counter: the inverted output of the last stage is fed back to the first, producing 2N distinct states with N flip-flops.
  • Synchronous clocking is typical; decoding is straightforward.


Concept / Approach:
Because these counters provide easily decodable one-hot or two-hot patterns with low logic overhead, they are favored where simple, glitch-resistant state outputs are needed. Their usage is common in CPLD/FPGA designs and discrete TTL/CMOS projects alike.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Recognize ring/Johnson as shift-register feedback topologies.Note applications: timing sequences, divide-by-N chains, LED scanning.Conclude that describing them as “uncommon” is a mischaracterization.


Verification / Alternative check:

Survey introductory digital design textbooks and vendor app notes; both cover these counters prominently.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Correct: Would imply rarity; contradicted by widespread usage.True only in ASICs / FPGAs: Both discrete and programmable logic use them.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing these with binary ripple or synchronous up/down counters; they serve different needs.Overlooking the ease of decoding compared to binary counters.


Final Answer:

Incorrect

More Questions from Shift Registers

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion