Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only I and II follow
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Repeated food-borne illness indicates systemic hygiene failures. Remedies prioritize stopping exposure and enforcing contractual accountability, while due process governs criminal liability.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Terminate and seek damages (I) to protect patrons and create accountability. Issue immediate advisories (II) to halt consumption pending fresh approvals. Immediate arrest (III) without investigation remains improper; proceed only after establishing negligence per statute.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Suspend/terminate vendor; deep-clean premises (I).2) Notify public to avoid the food; arrange alternate catering (II).3) Initiate statutory inspection, sampling; prosecute if violations confirmed.
Verification / Alternative check:
Food safety enforcement sequences contract, administrative, and criminal actions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
III presumes guilt; “All” inherits this flaw; single-option answers under-address exposure and accountability.
Common Pitfalls:
Resuming services before corrective actions are validated.
Final Answer:
Only I and II follow.
Discussion & Comments