Logic trigger: Statement: “R and P are sent to play, when Q bawls and S watches.” Choose the pair that states trigger and outcome consistently. (i) R and P are sent to play. (ii) Q bawls. (iii) S watches. (iv) Q bawls and S watches.

Introduction / Context:
The rule: (Q bawls AND S watches) → (R and P sent to play).

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Both conditions together trigger the action.

Concept / Approach:
State the trigger first, then the outcome.

Step-by-Step Solution:
(iv) Q bawls & S watches; (i) R and P are sent → consistent implication.

Verification / Alternative check:
Any pair lacking one of the trigger parts is insufficient.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They reverse direction or omit necessary conditions.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming either (ii) or (iii) alone is enough.

Final Answer:
(iv) (i)