Introduction / Context:
“Mud-slinging” is a set phrase in political discourse meaning the act of making unfair, often false, accusations to damage someone’s reputation. It focuses on defamatory speech rather than mere argument or humor.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Target expression: mud-slinging.
- Domain: public life, politics, media.
- We must choose the closest single-word synonym.
Concept / Approach:
Among the options, “slander” (defamation by spoken statements) most directly matches the essence of mud-slinging: attacking a rival’s reputation with allegations that are untrue or unproven. “Mockery” is ridicule, which may not involve defamatory claims. “Quarrelling” is general arguing. “Caricatures” are exaggerated drawings; “banter” is playful teasing, not defamation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Define mud-slinging: defamatory attacks, especially in campaigns.2) Align with legal/ethical terminology: slander/libel.3) Pick “slander” as the best single-word match.4) Eliminate options that connote humor or simple conflict without defamation.5) Check that the sentence remains meaningful with the substitute.
Verification / Alternative check:
Substitute: “Public figures should not indulge in slander” retains the admonition and legal flavor of the original idiom.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
caricatures: Visual satire; not defamatory speech per se.mockery: Ridicule; lacks the allegation component.quarrelling: Fighting verbally; not necessarily defamatory.banter: Light, playful talk; opposite tone.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating any negative talk with mud-slinging. The key ingredient is reputational harm through accusations.
Final Answer:
slander
Discussion & Comments