Statement–Argument (University Admission with HSC Backlogs): Statement: Should students who failed in one or two HSC subjects be allowed provisional admission to degree courses, subject to passing supplementary exams? Arguments: I) Yes, this avoids a one-year break and helps educational continuity. II) Yes, it is a forward-looking policy that motivates higher studies. III) No, students should not continue without clearing all HSC subjects first. Choose the strongest evaluation.

Introduction / Context:Provisional admissions balance access with minimum standards by conditioning continuation on clearing backlogs promptly.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Supplementary exams exist within a defined timeframe.
• Institutions can revoke admission if conditions are unmet.
• Academic momentum matters for student success.

Concept / Approach:I and II support access and motivation while retaining an objective clearance condition. III is inflexible and ignores the safeguard of the supplementary requirement.

Step-by-Step Solution:I: Prevents loss of an academic year ⇒ strong.II: Encourages progression with accountability ⇒ strong.III: Absolute bar despite safeguards ⇒ weaker.

Verification / Alternative check:Common in many systems: conditional admits pending backlog clearance.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Picking only one ignores complementary benefits; III alone is too rigid.

Common Pitfalls:Assuming conditional admission equals dilution of standards.

Final Answer:I and II are strong.