Statement–Argument (Single Indirect Tax on All Commodities): Statement: Should all indirect taxes in India be consolidated into a single tax on all commodities? Arguments: I) Yes, it would simplify collection and reduce administrative cost. II) Yes, manufacturers and traders would benefit, boosting collections. III) No, since other countries have not adopted such a system. Choose the strongest evaluation.
-
AOnly I is strong
-
BOnly I and III are strong
-
COnly II is strong
-
DOnly II and III are strong
-
ENone is strong
Answer
Correct Answer: Only I is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Consolidating indirect taxes can streamline compliance and reduce cascading, provided design handles rates, exemptions, and input credits.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Simplification can cut administration and compliance costs.
- Business benefits do not automatically “boost” collections; rate/credit design matters.
- Policy merit is not proven by foreign adoption patterns alone.
Concept / Approach:I is strong—administrative simplicity is a valid objective. II is speculative (benefits may or may not raise revenue). III is a bandwagon appeal, not a substantive reason.
Step-by-Step Solution:I: Directly supports efficiency ⇒ strong.II: Causal leap from benefit to higher collections ⇒ weak.III: “Others don’t do it” ≠ evidence ⇒ weak.
Verification / Alternative check:Real-world implementations hinge on design (multi-rate vs single-rate, credits), not mere consolidation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Including II/III validates weak reasoning; “None” ignores I’s clear merit.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming uniform gains without design specifics; deferring to international imitation.
Final Answer:Only I is strong.