Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: time
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Engineering projects—especially digital-system designs—operate under competing constraints: we must achieve a defined scope with acceptable quality, within a budget, and by a deadline. Of these, the factor that most visibly governs milestones and risk is time, the project schedule dimension.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
“Time” sits at the center of planning: the critical path method identifies tasks that determine the minimum completion time. Slack on noncritical tasks does not alter the delivery date, but any slip on critical-path items immediately threatens deadlines. Contingency buffers and iterative milestones revolve around time management.
Step-by-Step Solution (Reasoning):
Verification / Alternative check:
Project frameworks (PMI, Agile) center on time-boxing, sprints, and milestone-based gates; risk registers often track schedule impact first.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Underestimating verification time; inadequate buffers; ignoring vendor lead times; parallelizing tasks that are actually dependent.
Final Answer:
time
Discussion & Comments