Poverty is described as a symptom as well as a consequence of social disorder; which of the given assumptions about poverty and social order can definitely be drawn?

Introduction / Context:
This reasoning question asks you to interpret a statement about poverty and social disorder and decide which assumptions can definitely be drawn from it. The statement links poverty with social disorder in two ways, and the assumptions suggest different interpretations of that link.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Statement: Poverty is a symptom as well as a consequence of social disorder.
• Assumption I: Poverty is a type of social order.
• Assumption II: Poverty is related to social order.
• We must treat the statement as true and see which assumptions are supported.

Concept / Approach:
A symptom and a consequence of social disorder are both effects related to that disorder. The phrase social order refers to the structure and functioning of society, and social disorder refers to its breakdown. From this, we can infer that poverty has a relationship with social order or disorder. However, that does not mean poverty itself is a form of social order.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: The statement says poverty is a symptom and consequence of social disorder. This clearly links poverty with social disorder. Step 2: If something is a symptom and consequence of social disorder, it is obviously related to the condition of social order and its breakdown. So assumption II is directly supported. Step 3: Assumption I claims that poverty is a type of social order. The statement does not call poverty a form of order, but rather an outcome of disorder. This is a different concept. Step 4: Therefore assumption I goes beyond what is said and is not supported by the statement.

Verification / Alternative check:
Think of an illness analogy. Saying fever is a symptom and consequence of infection does not mean fever is a type of infection. It only means fever is related to infection. Similarly, saying poverty is a symptom and consequence of social disorder means poverty is linked to the state of social order, but it does not redefine poverty as a form of social order itself.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A selects only assumption I, which is clearly not justified. Option C claims both are correct, which wrongly includes assumption I. Option D says neither assumption is correct, which ignores the clear relationship described in the statement. Option E suggests that exactly one is correct without specifying which, but you are expected to identify the specific valid assumption, which is assumption II.

Common Pitfalls:
A common error is to read the phrase related to social order as meaning poverty is part of the structure of social order, rather than an effect of its breakdown. Another mistake is to treat every word in the statement as a definition, which leads to over interpretation of the term social disorder.

Final Answer:
The correct conclusion is that only assumption II is correct, because poverty is clearly related to social order but is not itself a type of social order.