Statement–Assumption (Choosing Avon for Picnic to Avoid Crowd): Statement: A group of friends decided to go for a picnic to Avon during the next holiday season to avoid the crowd. Assumptions: I) Generally, fewer people go to Avon (it is less crowded than alternatives). II) People prefer other spots to Avon. III) Many people know about Avon.

Introduction / Context:
When a destination is chosen “to avoid the crowd,” the implicit belief is that the chosen place will be less crowded than typical alternatives during that period. Other propositions about popularity or awareness may be true, but they are not logically required unless the statement depends on them.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Goal: avoid crowds in the holiday season.
• Action: select Avon as picnic spot.

Concept / Approach:
The choice hinges on a relative-crowding expectation: Avon is expected to be comparatively emptier. Assumptions about general preferences or brand awareness are not needed to justify the decision.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: This captures the necessary rationale—Avon is expected to be less crowded; otherwise the plan fails its purpose. Implicit.II: “People prefer other spots to Avon” may help explain fewer crowds but is not necessary; there could be many reasons for low crowds (distance, cost, access). Not implicit.III: “Many people know about Avon” is irrelevant; even with low awareness, the friends could still know and go. Not implicit.

Verification / Alternative check:
Avoiding crowds only needs a comparative-crowd expectation about Avon; global preference/awareness claims are extraneous.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“I and III” adds an unnecessary premise; “All” over-commits; “None” ignores the obvious less-crowded assumption.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming broader market popularity/awareness when the logic only needs a relative crowd expectation.

Final Answer:
Only I is implicit.