Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: I and II are implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Statement–Assumption questions test whether given assumptions must be taken as true for a statement to make sense. Here, an advertisement claims Z-TV uniquely allows watching two programmes simultaneously. We must identify which assumptions the advertiser is relying on to justify issuing this message.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In these items, an assumption is something the author must be presuming for the statement (or act) to be meaningful. It need not be definitively true; it must be reasonably taken for granted by the advertiser.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Check I: If the advertiser does not expect sales to increase, running the ad would have little purpose. Hence I is reasonably implicit.Check II: Ads are meant to persuade at least some people; otherwise advertising is pointless. Therefore II is implicit.Check III: A downward sales trend is not required for the ad to be meaningful. Ads are run both in good and bad times. III is not implicit.
Verification / Alternative check:
Even if current sales were steady or rising, a firm could still advertise to gain more market share. Thus III is unnecessary.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Do not confuse “possible” with “assumed”. The advertiser need not assume bad current sales to advertise.
Final Answer:
I and II are implicit.
Discussion & Comments