Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only (a), (b), and (d) are correct
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Aggregate type strongly influences concrete properties such as strength, modulus, shrinkage, durability, and fire performance. Identifying correct generalizations about commonly used aggregates helps in selecting appropriate materials for specific performance goals.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
(a) Sandstone classifications by dominant cementing/constituent (calcareous, siliceous, ferruginous) are widely used — correct. (b) Sandstone aggregates often lead to relatively higher drying shrinkage than strong igneous rocks, increasing cracking propensity — broadly correct. (c) Very hard close-grained crystalline limestones are indeed suitable and typically produce good strength; stating they provide “low strength” is misleading — incorrect. (d) Brick aggregate concrete, though lower in strength, exhibits good fire resistance — correct.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Materials texts report shrinkage ranking often as: lightweight > sedimentary (incl. many sandstones) > dense igneous; and note brick aggregate's favourable performance in fire tests.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
Only (a), (b), and (d) are correct.
Discussion & Comments