Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: All the above
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Roadside safety features reduce run-off-road crash severity, especially on elevated embankments and horizontal curves. The selection between guard stones, safety fences (guardrails), and barriers depends on embankment height, curve radius, and available recovery area. Recognizing threshold values helps designers pick the minimum treatment to protect errant vehicles.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Where drop-offs are significant, containment is preferred over delineation. At moderate heights (1.6–3 m), guard stones provide physical and visual guidance. For higher embankments and sharper curves, safety fences (e.g., W-beam guardrails) are recommended, particularly on the outside of curves where the risk of departure is greatest. At very high embankments (> 6 m), bilateral protection may be justified where both sides present hazards.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Match embankment height bands with customary treatments.
Associate sharper curves (R < 750 m) with installing safety fences on the outside edge.
Recognize that very high embankments require stronger or bilateral containment.
Conclude all listed prescriptions are consistent; choose “All the above”.
Verification / Alternative check:
These thresholds align with common Indian practice for two-lane rural highways and hill roads, where visibility constraints and slope hazards warrant progressive protection measures based on risk.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
All the above.
Discussion & Comments