Analogy — “Cloth : Texture”. Pick the pair that mirrors object → inherent measurable/observable attribute.

Introduction / Context:
The stem pairs an object with an inherent attribute: cloth has texture (smooth, coarse, etc.). The task is to choose another pair expressing “entity → intrinsic measurable/observable attribute,” rather than material, content, or part-whole relations.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Texture is an inherent quality of cloth.
• The correct pair should likewise map an entity to a property characterizing it.

Concept / Approach:
“Body : Weight” captures entity → measurable attribute. Weight is a defining physical property measured for a body (person/object). Alternatives either reverse material–object relations or list structural features rather than a general attribute.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
“Wood : Grains” is close (attribute-like pattern), but “grains” are structural patterns rather than a general measure; “Body : Weight” is the textbook attribute relation analogous to “texture.”

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Selecting material or part–whole relations instead of an intrinsic attribute.

Final Answer:
Body : Weight