Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Slow growth with very low energy yield on inorganic substrates
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Nitrifying bacteria (for example, ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria) are classic chemolithoautotrophs. Many students attempt to isolate them using the same rich media and quick plating methods that work for heterotrophs such as Escherichia coli. This question tests understanding of why those usual methods fail for nitrifiers in standard lab settings.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Chemolithoautotrophy yields far less energy per mole substrate than aerobic oxidation of organics. Consequently, nitrifiers have very slow growth rates, long lag phases, and low maximum cell densities. On mixed plates, trace heterotrophs rapidly outcompete them. Selective, mineral media with inorganic electron donors/acceptors, bicarbonate buffering, and long incubation in the dark are needed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the metabolic type: chemolithoautotroph using NH3 or NO2−.
Link metabolism to growth kinetics: low ATP yield → slow division times.
Infer culture consequence: usual rich media select against nitrifiers; they are overgrown or inhibited.
Conclude the root cause: slow growth with low energy yield requires specialized enrichment.
Verification / Alternative check:
Enrichment cultures for nitrifiers typically run for weeks using ammonium or nitrite as the sole energy source and bicarbonate as carbon source; appearance of nitrite/nitrate confirms activity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Medium/fast growth – contradicts observed weeks-long enrichment times. Thermophily only above 70°C – false; most nitrifiers are mesophiles.
Common Pitfalls:
Attempting to streak on nutrient agar or adding organic carbon; both suppress nitrifier recovery.
Final Answer:
Slow growth with very low energy yield on inorganic substrates.
Discussion & Comments