Statement–Assumption — “The municipal corporation permits fun fairs in the local football ground during the holiday season.” Assumptions: I. Local residents may protest the corporation’s decision. II. Many people may refuse to participate in the fun fair.

Introduction / Context:
The authority grants permission for an event venue. We must determine whether this act presupposes protest or poor turnout.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Granting permission is an administrative decision applying rules on land use, safety, and scheduling.
• No statement is made about public sentiment or participation levels.

Concept / Approach:
For permission to be rational, the authority needs only legal and logistical compliance, not expectations about protests or crowd sizes. Thus neither a protest prediction nor a participation forecast is required as a premise for the stated action.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Assumption I: Possible protests do not underpin the grant of permission; the decision can stand on regulatory eligibility alone.2) Assumption II: Likewise, the permission does not rely on a belief that many will or will not attend.

Verification / Alternative check:
Permissions are routinely issued based on compliance even when public turnout is uncertain.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option endorsing I or II reads speculative crowd dynamics into an administrative act.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing event approval prerequisites with marketing considerations.

Final Answer:
if neither I nor II is implicit