In bioreactor characterization, which standard method(s) can be used to determine the oxygen absorption (transfer) rate in a liquid culture system?

Biochemical Engineering Agitation and Aeration Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    Sodium sulfite oxidation method
  • B
    Dynamic gassing-out technique
  • C
    Direct dissolved-oxygen measurement under steady state
  • D
    All of these
  • E
    None of these

Answer

Correct Answer: All of these

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Measuring oxygen transfer is central to aerobic fermentation design and scale-up. Engineers routinely estimate volumetric mass transfer coefficients and oxygen absorption rates using chemical and biological methods. This question reviews the common laboratory/plant techniques you should recognize.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Well-mixed vessel; dissolved oxygen (DO) probe is available when needed.
  • Air or oxygen-enriched gas is sparged; temperature and salinity controlled.
  • Biological oxygen uptake may be present or purposely eliminated (chemical method).

Concept / Approach:The sodium sulfite oxidation test chemically removes oxygen with a well-known stoichiometry, letting you back-calculate transfer rate. The dynamic gassing-out method strips DO to low levels and then tracks the DO rise after re-aeration to estimate kLa and absorption rate. Under steady state with known oxygen uptake rate, direct DO balance can also yield oxygen absorption/transfer rates.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Sulfite method: dose Na2SO3 plus catalyst; measure oxygen uptake; compute transfer.Dynamic gassing-out: deoxygenate, then fit DO(t) to 1 − exp(−kLa t) to obtain kLa and rate.Direct measurement: at steady state, set transfer rate = biological uptake rate by mass balance.

Verification / Alternative check:Cross-compare estimates from chemical vs. biological methods under identical hydrodynamics; values should agree within experimental error if probe response is accounted for.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Saying only one method works ignores standard practice.
  • “None”: contradicts decades of reactor testing methodology.

Common Pitfalls:Neglecting probe lag, temperature correction, or catalyst presence in sulfite tests; misfitting DO transients.

Final Answer:All of these.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion