Fermi–Dirac Occupancy Near the Fermi Level In a metal at ordinary temperatures, how does the probability of occupancy of a state 0.1 eV below the Fermi level compare with that of a state 0.1 eV above the Fermi level?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Greater than the probability 0.1 eV above the Fermi level

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The Fermi–Dirac distribution gives the probability that an electronic state of energy E is occupied at temperature T: f(E) = 1 / (1 + exp[(E − EF)/(kT)]). This distribution is steep near the Fermi level EF, with occupancy dropping from near 1 below EF to near 0 above EF within a few kT. Understanding this asymmetry is essential for transport and tunneling analyses.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Metal at moderate temperature (e.g., 300 K).
  • Energy offsets ±0.1 eV relative to EF, which are several times kT (kT ≈ 0.025 eV).
  • No band structure anomalies near EF.


Concept / Approach:

For ΔE = 0.1 eV, ΔE/(kT) ≈ 0.1/0.025 ≈ 4. Thus, f(EF − 0.1 eV) ≈ 1 / (1 + e^(−4)) ≈ 0.982, while f(EF + 0.1 eV) ≈ 1 / (1 + e^(+4)) ≈ 0.018. Therefore, the state below EF is far more likely to be occupied than the one above EF.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute ratio ΔE/kT ≈ 4 at room temperature.Evaluate occupancies: below EF → ~98%; above EF → ~2%.Conclude: probability below EF is greater than above EF.


Verification / Alternative check:

Symmetry: f(EF + ΔE) = 1 − f(EF − ΔE). For ΔE ≫ kT, one is near 1, the other near 0.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Equal or indeterminate contradicts the monotonic nature of f(E) around EF.
  • “Less than” reverses the physically correct inequality.


Common Pitfalls:

Forgetting to convert kT to eV; assuming a symmetric 50–50 occupancy at ±ΔE (only true at ΔE = 0).


Final Answer:

Greater than the probability 0.1 eV above the Fermi level

More Questions from Materials and Components

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion