Bohr model stability condition for hydrogen In a hydrogen atom, an electron orbits a proton. According to the Bohr (classical) picture, orbital stability requires equilibrium between the attractive Coulomb force and the required centripetal force. Is this statement correct?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: True

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The Bohr model, though superseded by quantum mechanics, provides an intuitive picture of hydrogenic orbits. It relates electrostatic attraction to centripetal requirements for circular motion, combined with angular-momentum quantization, to explain discrete energy levels and spectral lines.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Single electron moving in a circular orbit around a fixed proton.
  • Non-relativistic speeds; classical Coulomb force law.
  • Bohr quantization of angular momentum L = n h/(2π).


Concept / Approach:

For a circular orbit, the centripetal force m v^2 / r must be supplied by Coulomb attraction k e^2 / r^2 (with k = 1/(4π ε0), e the elementary charge). Equating these gives the relationship among m, v, and r. Combined with the angular momentum postulate, one solves for allowed radii r_n and energies E_n. This balance is the physical “stability” condition in the Bohr picture.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Set m v^2 / r = k e^2 / r^2.Rearrange: m v^2 = k e^2 / r.With L = m v r = n h/(2π), solve for r_n and E_n (results r_n ∝ n^2, E_n ∝ −1/n^2).


Verification / Alternative check:

In full quantum mechanics, the expectation values match Bohr predictions for hydrogen energy levels, validating the historical model’s results though not its orbital picture.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Limiting the validity to n = 1 or T = 0 is unnecessary in the Bohr framework; relativistic corrections are small and not required for the primary stability condition.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing “stability” here with quantum stability; Bohr’s circular orbit analogy is a semi-classical construction leading to correct spectra despite its limitations.


Final Answer:

True

More Questions from Materials and Components

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion