Q: Identification of riveted joint type Two main plates butt against each other and are connected with two cover plates using two rows of rivets. What is this joint called?

Introduction / Context: Riveted and bolted joints are classified by how plates are brought together (lap vs. butt), number of cover plates, and the number/arrangement of fastener rows. Correct terminology is important in fabrication drawings and specifications. Given Data / Assumptions: Main plates meet at a butt (their edges touch). There are two cover plates, one on each side of the joint. Two rows of rivets are used. Concept / Approach: Butt joints use cover plates (“straps”) to connect abutting main plates. With two straps and two rows of rivets, the descriptive name is “double-riveted double-cover butt joint.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify joint as butt (not lap) due to abutting main plates.Count cover plates: two ⇒ double-cover.Count rows: two ⇒ double-riveted. Verification / Alternative check: Fabrication standards use the same nomenclature, often abbreviated as DR-DC butt joint. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lap joint has overlapping main plates, not abutting. Single-riveted/single-cover variants do not match the given description. “Butt joint” alone is incomplete; does not specify rows or covers. Common Pitfalls: Confusing number of rows with number of covers; they describe different aspects. Final Answer: Double-riveted double-cover butt joint

Q: Efficiency of a diamond-riveted joint For a plate of width b joined by diamond riveting with rivet-hole diameter d, the (simplified) efficiency based on the net-width criterion across the weakest critical section is:

Introduction / Context: Joint efficiency compares the strength of a riveted (or bolted) joint to that of the unperforated plate. For diamond riveting (a staggered, centrally concentrated pattern), the weakest net section often passes through a single rivet hole on the line of the plate center. Given Data / Assumptions: Plate width b; rivet-hole diameter d (finished hole). Critical section governed by net area across the least net width (simplified classical approach). Shear/tear or bearing checks are assumed non-governing for this idealized question. Concept / Approach: Efficiency η (by net-width) = (net tensile strength) / (gross tensile strength) = (b - total hole deduction across the weakest section) / b. In single-line diamond patterns, the weakest section typically cuts only one hole on the central line, so deduction = d. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify weakest section through the central single hole.Compute net width = b - d.Efficiency η = (b - d) / b. Verification / Alternative check: For multiple-hole sections (e.g., chain riveting), deductions increase and efficiency reduces accordingly; diamond staggering aims to maximize net width and thus efficiency. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b - 2d)/b, (b - 3d)/b, (b - 4d)/b correspond to sections cutting more than one hole, not the critical diamond section here. 1 - (π d^2) / (4 b^2) is unrelated to net-width criterion (area ratio of a circle to a square band) and not the standard expression. Common Pitfalls: Using pitch/edge distance rules to adjust the deduction; this simplified question isolates the net-width effect only. Final Answer: (b - d) / b

Question 1

Bending strength for equal-area beams under the same bending moment A square beam and a circular beam have the same cross-sectional area and are subjected to the same bending moment. Based on section modulus and resulting extreme fiber stress, which…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: When two beams are made of the same material and carry the same bending moment, the bending stress at the extreme fiber is inversely proportional to the section modulus. For a fixed cross-sectional area, the shape that yields a larger section modulus produces lower bending stress and is therefore stronger and more economical in bending design. Given Data / Assumptions: Same material and same allowable stress for both beams. Square beam side = a; circular beam diameter = d. Equal area condition: a^2 = (π d^2)/4. Pure bending; linear elastic behavior; no shear effects considered. Concept / Approach: Bending stress relation: σ = M / Z, where Z = I / c is the section modulus. For equal area, the beam with the larger Z has smaller σ for the same moment M, hence is stronger/more economical. Compute Z for square and circle under the equal-area constraint and compare magnitudes. Step-by-Step Solution: Equal area: a^2 = (π d^2)/4 ⇒ d = 2a/√π.Square: I = a^4/12, c = a/2 ⇒ Z_square = (a^4/12)/(a/2) = a^3/6.Circle: I = π d^4/64, c = d/2 ⇒ Z_circle = (π d^4/64)/(d/2) = (π d^3)/32.Insert d = 2a/√π ⇒ Z_circle = (π (8a^3/π^{3/2}))/32 = a^3/(4√π) ≈ 0.141 a^3.Z_square = a^3/6 ≈ 0.167 a^3 > Z_circle. Therefore square produces lower stress for the same M. Verification / Alternative check: Numerical example with a = 1 unit gives Z_square ≈ 0.167 and Z_circle ≈ 0.141. Since σ ∝ 1/Z, the square shows about 18% lower extreme fiber stress, confirming superior bending efficiency for equal area. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Circular beam is more economical: False; its section modulus is smaller for equal area. Both equally strong/economical: False; Z differs noticeably. None of these: Incorrect because one shape is clearly better in bending for equal area. Common Pitfalls: Comparing second moment I alone; the correct comparison uses section modulus Z = I/c. Forgetting to enforce equal area before comparing Z values. Final Answer: square beam is more economical.

Question 2

Strain energy definition in strength of materials Strain energy of a structural member is the internal work stored due to deformation under loading. Which description best captures this definition for members that may elongate or shorten?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Strain energy is the elastic energy stored within a body when it is subjected to loads that cause deformation. It underpins energy methods such as Castigliano’s theorems and provides insight into how structures distribute load and deform under service conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: Linear elastic range is assumed so that energy is recoverable upon unloading. Members may experience tension (elongation) or compression (shortening). Deformations are small, and work done equals area under the load–deflection curve. Concept / Approach: For a uniaxial bar, strain energy U = ∫ P du = ∫ σ dε · Volume. In linear elasticity with constant E and uniform stress, U = σ^2/(2E) · Volume = P^2 L/(2 A E). This same concept generalizes to bending, shear, torsion, and combined states, always representing the internal work associated with the deformation resisted by the member. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that “work done to deform” includes both elongation (tension) and shortening (compression).Energy is stored regardless of the sign of strain, provided the material behaves elastically.Therefore any concise description mentioning deformation work—whether resisting elongation or resisting shortening—correctly reflects strain energy. Verification / Alternative check: In bending, U = ∫ M^2/(2 E I) dx; in torsion, U = ∫ T^2/(2 G J) dx. These expressions represent energy stored due to deformation modes other than simple tension/compression, reinforcing the definition as “work done to deform.” Why Other Options Are Wrong (individually): Each of (a), (b), and (c) is only a partial statement; strain energy encompasses all these cases simultaneously. “None of these” is incorrect because all are true facets of the same concept. Common Pitfalls: Mistaking external work for purely dissipative effects; in the elastic range, it is stored and recoverable. Forgetting that compression stores energy just as tension does. Final Answer: all the above.

Question 3

Shape of bending moment diagram for a cantilever with full-length uniformly distributed load Consider a cantilever beam carrying a uniformly distributed load over its entire span. What is the shape of the bending moment (B.M.) diagram?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Recognizing the qualitative shape of shear force (S.F.) and bending moment (B.M.) diagrams is a fundamental skill in structural analysis. It enables quick checks and hand calculations before detailed numerical analysis. Given Data / Assumptions: Cantilever beam with a uniformly distributed load of intensity w over the full length L. Static equilibrium, small deformations, prismatic member. Sign convention: negative moment at the fixed end (sagging/hogging depends on convention). Concept / Approach: For a cantilever under UDL, the shear force at a distance x from the free end is V(x) = w x (taking zero at the free end), which varies linearly with x. The bending moment is the integral of shear, M(x) = ∫ V dx = w x^2/2 (with sign per convention), hence a second-degree curve (parabola) that is zero at the free end and maximum in magnitude at the fixed end. Step-by-Step Solution: Start at the free end: V(0) = 0; M(0) = 0.At a generic section x from the free end: V(x) = w x (linear), M(x) = w x^2/2 (parabolic).At the fixed end x = L: V(L) = w L; M(L) = w L^2/2 (maximum magnitude). Verification / Alternative check: Different sign conventions invert the diagram vertically but do not change its parabolic shape. The curvature of the elastic line is proportional to moment; a parabolic M(x) produces cubic deflection, consistent with classical beam theory results. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Triangle/rectangle/trapezium: These correspond to constant or linearly varying moments or to S.F. shapes, not to the cantilever B.M. under UDL. Cubic parabola: That would arise for the slope/deflection shapes, not for the bending moment here. Common Pitfalls: Confusing S.F. (linear) and B.M. (parabolic) shapes. Starting the S.F. at the fixed end instead of the free end and losing track of sign/shape. Final Answer: parabola.

Question 4

Base width for “no tension” condition — triangular vs rectangular sections of the same height For two gravity-type sections of the same height (one triangular, one rectangular), compare the required bottom width to satisfy the “no tension at the bas…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In gravity structures (e.g., retaining walls, small dams, masonry sections), a common serviceability requirement is that the resultant at the base stays within the middle kernel so that no tensile stress develops. The base width needed to prevent tension depends on how the section distributes self-weight relative to the toe and heel where overturning acts. Given Data / Assumptions: Two sections have the same height. Overturning direction is the same for both shapes. Self-weight provides stabilizing moment; tensile stress at the base is not allowed (resultant within the middle third for rectangular sections and within the elastic core for the actual shape). Concept / Approach: For equal height, a triangular section concentrates more of its self-weight near the base, creating a larger stabilizing lever arm against overturning compared with a rectangular section of the same base width. Consequently, to keep the resultant within the permitted kernel and avoid tension, a rectangular section generally needs a larger base width than a triangular section subjected to similar actions. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the center of gravity: rectangle at mid-width; triangle located at b/3 from the toe or heel depending on orientation.The triangular section’s weight acts at a distance providing greater stabilizing moment for a given base width.To prevent tension, shift the resultant toward the section interior; triangular geometry aids this more effectively than the rectangular one. Verification / Alternative check: Illustrative computations with a simple overturning couple and self-weight show that the eccentricity of the resultant relative to the base midpoint is smaller for a triangular profile at the same base width, hence it reaches the “no tension” kernel more easily. Therefore, for equal height, the rectangular section must be made wider to meet the same criterion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Triangular requires more width: Opposite to the stabilizing leverage effect described. Same width: Neglects the differing weight centroids and lever arms. Triangular never satisfies no-tension: Incorrect; with adequate base it certainly can. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring the centroid location and its influence on stabilizing moment. Confusing the kernel (core) condition with a pure middle-third rule for all shapes. Final Answer: for rectangular section the required bottom width is more than that for a triangular section.

Question 5

Definition of a tie member in framed structures In structural frames and trusses, “ties” are members primarily designed to carry which type of loading under service conditions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Structural frames often distinguish between members that are mainly in tension (ties) and those mainly in compression (struts). Correct terminology matters for design detailing, end connections, and serviceability expectations in steel, timber, and reinforced concrete systems. Given Data / Assumptions: Member is part of a two-dimensional frame or truss. Primary action is axial; flexure and torsion are secondary or negligible by design. Service load combinations keep the member in its intended force state. Concept / Approach: A tie is a member intended to resist axial tension. Examples include the bottom chord of a simply supported truss, rod ties in roof systems, or hold-down ties in shear walls. Conversely, a strut is a member intended to resist axial compression. Recognizing the force type dictates connection detailing (e.g., clevis, gusset plates), sizing, and buckling checks. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the definition: “tie” → member in tension.Exclude alternatives: compression (struts), torsion (shafts), transverse loads (beams).Conclude the correct loading type is axial tension. Verification / Alternative check: Design guides consistently classify ties as tension members, requiring net-section checks, block shear, and connection slip considerations rather than buckling checks that are mandatory for struts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Transverse loads: Characteristic of beams, not ties. Axial compression: Defines struts. Torsional loads: Typical of shafts or closed-section members under torque. Biaxial bending: Pertains to columns or beam-columns, not pure ties. Common Pitfalls: Treating a tie as a beam and overlooking the importance of axial stiffness and connection detailing. Allowing load reversals that could put a nominal tie into compression without verifying its buckling resistance. Final Answer: axial tension loads.

Question 6

Time-dependent deformation under constant tensile stress The phenomenon describing the slow, progressive increase of strain in a material subjected to a steady (constant) tensile stress over time is called:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Materials often display time-dependent behavior. Under constant stress, some continue to deform gradually, a process relevant to metals at high temperature, polymers at ordinary temperatures, and concrete under sustained loads. Understanding terminology helps interpret long-term serviceability and durability. Given Data / Assumptions: Constant tensile stress (sustained load). Observation of strain increasing with time. Material within service stress levels (not immediate fracture). Concept / Approach: Creep (or creeping) is the time-dependent increase in strain under sustained stress. The classical creep curve includes primary (transient) creep with decreasing rate, secondary (steady-state) creep with nearly constant rate, and tertiary creep culminating in failure. Temperature, humidity (for concrete/wood), and stress level significantly influence creep rate and magnitude. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the condition: constant stress with strain increasing over time → creep process.Exclude other phenomena: yielding is immediate plastic flow when stress exceeds yield strength; breaking is ultimate fracture, not progressive strain under constant stress.Hence the correct term is “creeping.” Verification / Alternative check: Concrete codes include creep coefficients to estimate additional deflection under sustained loads. Metallurgy handbooks present creep rupture curves as time-to-failure vs stress at a given temperature, reinforcing the definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Yielding: Instantaneous plastic deformation at yield; not a slow time-dependent strain under sub-yield stresses (except viscoplastic contexts). Breaking: Final failure; does not describe the progressive deformation stage. None of these: Incorrect because “creeping” precisely names the phenomenon. Ratcheting: Progressive plastic strain under cyclic asymmetric loading, not constant stress. Common Pitfalls: Confusing creep with shrinkage (stress-free volume change) in materials like concrete. Assuming creep is only a high-temperature metal issue; it also affects polymers and cementitious materials. Final Answer: creeping.

Question 7

Internal force components at the end of a planar frame member In planar (2D) frame analysis, how many transverse shear force components can act at either end of a member (considering the standard internal force set at a member end)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In two-dimensional frame and beam theory, the internal forces transmitted across a member end section are resolved into a standard set. Understanding how many independent components exist helps when writing equilibrium equations, assembling global stiffness matrices, and interpreting analysis outputs. Given Data / Assumptions: Planar (2D) behavior only; out-of-plane actions are excluded. Standard internal force set at a member end: axial force (N), shear force (V), and bending moment (M). Member and joints are idealized as line elements with no warping/torsion DOF in 2D. Concept / Approach: At the cut end of a 2D frame member, there are three independent internal actions: one axial force along the member axis (N), one transverse shear force perpendicular to the axis (V), and one bending moment about the out-of-plane axis (M). Therefore, the number of transverse shear force components at either end is exactly one. Step-by-Step Solution: Enumerate internal actions in 2D: N, V, and M.Only one of these is a transverse shear force, denoted V.Hence, at either member end, the maximum number of transverse shear forces is one. Verification / Alternative check: In 3D frames, two orthogonal shear components exist at a cut section. Restricting to 2D reduces these to a single transverse shear degree of freedom per end, aligning with classical beam theory and standard finite element formulations (2D frame element with 3 DOF per node: u, v, θ). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Two/three/four: Not applicable in 2D; only one shear component exists. Zero: Incorrect; shear is a fundamental internal action even in pure bending segments adjacent to loads/reactions. Common Pitfalls: Mixing 2D and 3D internal action sets (which would include two shear components and a torsional moment). Confusing shear flow distribution with the single resultant transverse shear component. Final Answer: one.

Question 8

Torsion of a solid circular shaft A solid circular shaft of diameter d is subjected only to a torque T (pure torsion, no axial force or bending). What is the maximum normal (direct) stress induced anywhere in the shaft?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests fundamentals of torsion in solid circular shafts. Under pure torsion, the dominant stress is shear. Knowing which stresses appear (and which do not) is essential for safe shaft design. Given Data / Assumptions: Solid circular shaft, diameter d. Applied loading is torque T only (no bending moment, no axial force, no internal pressure). Saint-Venant torsion; material is homogeneous and isotropic. Concept / Approach: In elementary torsion theory of a circular shaft, the shear stress varies linearly with radius: tau(r) = T * r / J, where J is the polar second moment of area. There is no accompanying normal (direct) stress field caused by torque alone. Normal stresses would arise from axial force (tension/compression), bending moment, or thermal/pressure effects—not from pure torsion. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize loading type: pure torque ⇒ only shear stresses present.Normal stresses (sigma) require axial or bending actions; neither is present.Therefore, maximum normal stress anywhere in the section is zero. Verification / Alternative check: Mohr’s circle for pure shear shows principal normal stresses ±tau_max at 45° planes. However, on the physical cross-section (where normal stress is queried), the direct normal stress due to torsion is zero; the listed options refer to shear or unrelated expressions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: T * r / J and 32 * T / (π * d^3) are shear-stress expressions, not normal stress. M / Z corresponds to bending normal stress, not torsion. E * θ / L refers to twist per unit length relationship, not a stress. Common Pitfalls: Confusing principal normal stresses on inclined planes with direct normal stress on the cross-section; the question asks for normal stress induced in the shaft material due to torsion alone. Final Answer: Zero (no normal stress under pure torsion)

Question 9

Slenderness ratio of a square column A vertical column has a square cross-section of side 10 cm and an overall (effective) length of 500 cm with pinned ends. Compute its slenderness ratio λ = L_e / r.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Slenderness ratio indicates the susceptibility of a column to buckling. For a given effective length L_e and radius of gyration r, λ = L_e / r classifies a column as short, intermediate, or long. Given Data / Assumptions: Square cross-section: side a = 10 cm. Overall (effective) length L_e = 500 cm (pinned–pinned). Radius of gyration r = sqrt(I/A). Concept / Approach: For a square of side a: I = a^4 / 12 and A = a^2, so r = sqrt(I/A) = a / √12. Then λ = L_e / r. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute r = a / √12 = 10 / 3.464 = 2.8868 cm (approx.).Compute λ = L_e / r = 500 / 2.8868 ≈ 173.2.Match to options ⇒ 173.2. Verification / Alternative check: Using r^2 = I/A = (a^4/12) / a^2 = a^2/12 yields the same r value. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 117.2 and 137.2 arise from incorrect r or L assumptions. 17.3 and 13.72 are off by an order of magnitude, likely mixing cm and mm. Common Pitfalls: Confusing effective length with clear length, and mixing units; here all dimensions are in centimetres. Final Answer: 173.2

Question 10

Bending stress distribution in beams For pure bending of a prismatic member, the direct longitudinal stress σ at a point a distance r from the neutral axis is proportional to which power of r?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding how bending stress varies across the depth of a beam is fundamental for sizing sections and placing reinforcement. Given Data / Assumptions: Prismatic beam under pure bending moment M. Linear elastic (Hookean) material; plane sections remain plane. Neutral axis passes through the centroid. Concept / Approach: The flexure formula states σ = M * y / I, where y is the perpendicular distance from the neutral axis and I is the second moment of area. Hence, σ varies linearly with distance from the neutral axis. Step-by-Step Solution: Start from σ = M * y / I.Replace y by r (given notation): σ ∝ r.Therefore, proportional to the first power of r. Verification / Alternative check: At r = 0 (neutral axis), σ = 0; at the extreme fibre (maximum r), σ is maximum—consistent with linear variation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: r^2 or r^3 would imply nonlinear distributions inconsistent with beam theory. Independence of r or inverse dependence contradicts observed bending stress profiles. Common Pitfalls: Confusing shear stress distribution (parabolic in rectangles) with bending normal stress (linear). Final Answer: r

Question 11

Thin-walled cylinder under internal pressure If p is the internal pressure in a thin cylinder of diameter d and wall thickness t, what is the circumferential (hoop) stress σ_h developed in the shell?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Thin-cylinder formulas are used widely for boilers, pipes, and pressure vessels where wall thickness is small relative to diameter (t ≪ d). Two principal membrane stresses develop: hoop and longitudinal. Given Data / Assumptions: Internal pressure p, cylinder diameter d, wall thickness t. Thin-wall assumption: stress is uniform through thickness; t/d is small. No end caps or fittings altering membrane stress locally. Concept / Approach: Equilibrium of half the cylinder under pressure gives the hoop stress. Cutting along a diametral plane and balancing pressure force with resisting stresses yields the standard expression. Step-by-Step Solution: Pressure force on projected area = p * d * L (per unit length L).Resisting hoop force = 2 * σ_h * t * L.Equate: p * d * L = 2 * σ_h * t * L ⇒ σ_h = p * d / (2 * t). Verification / Alternative check: Longitudinal stress σ_l from end-cap equilibrium: σ_l = p * d / (4 * t), exactly half the hoop stress—consistent with thin-cylinder theory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: p d / t and 2 p d / t overestimate; they ignore the factor 2 from two walls resisting. p d / (4 t) is the longitudinal stress, not hoop stress. p t / d is dimensionally inconsistent for stress. Common Pitfalls: Confusing hoop and longitudinal formulas or missing the factor of 2 in the hoop-stress derivation. Final Answer: σ_h = p * d / (2 * t)

Question 12

Poisson’s ratio — general bound For stable, common engineering materials, the numerical value of Poisson’s ratio ν is generally:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Poisson’s ratio ν characterizes lateral strain response to axial strain in linear elasticity. Realistic bounds aid quick checks of test data and models. Given Data / Assumptions: Isotropic, linear-elastic solids with positive stiffness. No auxetic (negative ν) specialty materials considered. Concept / Approach: For a stable isotropic elastic material, the elastic moduli relationships require −1 < ν < 0.5 for positive definiteness (positive bulk and shear moduli). Most metals lie around 0.25 to 0.35, concretes and rocks near 0.15 to 0.25, rubbers approach 0.5. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall constraints: G = E / [2 (1 + ν)] and K = E / [3 (1 − 2 ν)].For G > 0 and K > 0 with E > 0 ⇒ 1 + ν > 0 and 1 − 2ν > 0 ⇒ ν < 0.5.Therefore, ν is less than 1 and practically less than 0.5 for standard materials. Verification / Alternative check: Empirical databases list ν for common materials well below 0.5. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Greater than or equal to 1 violates stability relations. “Undefined” is incorrect; ν is well-defined from lateral and axial strains. “Negative for all metals” is false; auxetics are special cases, not typical metals. Common Pitfalls: Assuming ν = 0.5 for all polymers; only nearly incompressible rubbers approach it, not all. Final Answer: Less than 1

Question 13

Identification of riveted joint type Two main plates butt against each other and are connected with two cover plates using two rows of rivets. What is this joint called?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Riveted and bolted joints are classified by how plates are brought together (lap vs. butt), number of cover plates, and the number/arrangement of fastener rows. Correct terminology is important in fabrication drawings and specifications. Given Data / Assumptions: Main plates meet at a butt (their edges touch). There are two cover plates, one on each side of the joint. Two rows of rivets are used. Concept / Approach: Butt joints use cover plates (“straps”) to connect abutting main plates. With two straps and two rows of rivets, the descriptive name is “double-riveted double-cover butt joint.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify joint as butt (not lap) due to abutting main plates.Count cover plates: two ⇒ double-cover.Count rows: two ⇒ double-riveted. Verification / Alternative check: Fabrication standards use the same nomenclature, often abbreviated as DR-DC butt joint. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lap joint has overlapping main plates, not abutting. Single-riveted/single-cover variants do not match the given description. “Butt joint” alone is incomplete; does not specify rows or covers. Common Pitfalls: Confusing number of rows with number of covers; they describe different aspects. Final Answer: Double-riveted double-cover butt joint

Question 14

Efficiency of a diamond-riveted joint For a plate of width b joined by diamond riveting with rivet-hole diameter d, the (simplified) efficiency based on the net-width criterion across the weakest critical section is:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Joint efficiency compares the strength of a riveted (or bolted) joint to that of the unperforated plate. For diamond riveting (a staggered, centrally concentrated pattern), the weakest net section often passes through a single rivet hole on the line of the plate center. Given Data / Assumptions: Plate width b; rivet-hole diameter d (finished hole). Critical section governed by net area across the least net width (simplified classical approach). Shear/tear or bearing checks are assumed non-governing for this idealized question. Concept / Approach: Efficiency η (by net-width) = (net tensile strength) / (gross tensile strength) = (b - total hole deduction across the weakest section) / b. In single-line diamond patterns, the weakest section typically cuts only one hole on the central line, so deduction = d. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify weakest section through the central single hole.Compute net width = b - d.Efficiency η = (b - d) / b. Verification / Alternative check: For multiple-hole sections (e.g., chain riveting), deductions increase and efficiency reduces accordingly; diamond staggering aims to maximize net width and thus efficiency. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b - 2d)/b, (b - 3d)/b, (b - 4d)/b correspond to sections cutting more than one hole, not the critical diamond section here. 1 - (π d^2) / (4 b^2) is unrelated to net-width criterion (area ratio of a circle to a square band) and not the standard expression. Common Pitfalls: Using pitch/edge distance rules to adjust the deduction; this simplified question isolates the net-width effect only. Final Answer: (b - d) / b

Question 15

Standard maximum deflection formulas (small deflection, prismatic beams) Which of the following expressions for maximum deflection δ_max are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Deflection control is essential for serviceability. Memorizing the classic small-deflection formulas for common loading cases saves time during preliminary design and checks. Given Data / Assumptions: Slender, prismatic beams obeying Euler–Bernoulli theory. Small deflections; linear material behavior. Loads as stated (point load W or uniformly distributed load w). Concept / Approach: The listed formulas are standard closed-form solutions obtained by integrating the differential equation E * I * d^2y/dx^2 = M(x) with appropriate boundary conditions for each case. Step-by-Step Solution (outline): For each load case, write bending moment function M(x).Integrate twice, apply boundary conditions to get y(x).Locate δ_max and evaluate the closed-form magnitude; results match the expressions in options a–d. Verification / Alternative check: Cross-reference with standard tables (Roark, structural handbooks) or quick energy methods (Castigliano’s theorem) which yield identical results. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Only option e collects the correct set; each of a–d is independently correct, so “All of the above” is the best answer. Common Pitfalls: Mixing the constants (3 vs 8 vs 48 vs 384); remembering that cantilevers deflect more than simply supported beams for similar loading is a useful check. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 16

Classification of column by slenderness A column is considered of “medium size” if its slenderness ratio λ falls within which range?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Slenderness ratio λ = L_e / r guides the choice of design formulae (short-block crushing, inelastic buckling, long-column Euler behavior). Many codes provide indicative ranges for classification. Given Data / Assumptions: Planar column; effective length L_e and radius of gyration r well-defined. Conventional classification used in many design texts. Concept / Approach: Typical ranges used in classical strength of materials: short columns (λ ≲ 32), medium/intermediate columns (approximately 32 to 120), and long columns (λ > 120), with exact thresholds varying slightly by code and material. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the interval corresponding to intermediate buckling behavior.Select the option that matches: 32 to 120. Verification / Alternative check: Many textbooks adopt the same boundaries; design standards may fine-tune by material and end conditions, but the given interval is a widely accepted benchmark. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 20–32 targets short columns. 120–160, 160–180, 180–200 represent long-column ranges. Common Pitfalls: Applying Euler’s long-column formula in the intermediate range without inelastic correction can be unconservative. Final Answer: 32 to 120

Question 17

In arch geometry (civil engineering): For a parabolic arch of span L and crown rise h, what is the rise (ordinate from the springing line) at the quarter points relative to the crown? State it as a multiple of the crown rise h.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Parabolic arches are widely used in bridges and roofs because a parabola closely matches the bending-moment line of a uniformly distributed load. Questions on ordinates at specific fractions of the span (such as quarter points) test understanding of the arch geometry and the standard parabola equation used in structural analysis. Given Data / Assumptions: Parabolic arch with span L. Crown rise (maximum ordinate at midspan) = h. Quarter point is located at x = L/4 from either support, measured horizontally along the span. Springings (supports) are at ordinate y = 0. Concept / Approach: The standard equation for the extrados/intrados of a symmetric parabolic arch referred to the springing line is: y(x) = 4h * x * (L - x) / L^2The ordinate y is the rise above the springing line at distance x. Evaluating this at special positions (midspan, quarter points) gives simple fractions of h. Step-by-Step Solution: At midspan: x = L/2 → y = 4h * (L/2) * (L/2) / L^2 = h (checks the crown rise).At quarter point: x = L/4 → y = 4h * (L/4) * (3L/4) / L^2Simplify numerator: 4h * (3L^2/16) = 12hL^2/16 = 3hL^2/4Divide by L^2: y = (3h/4)Therefore, rise at quarter = 0.75 * h = three-fourths of crown rise. Verification / Alternative check: Because a parabola is symmetric and zero at supports, the ordinate curve is concave down. At one-quarter span, the ordinate must be less than h but greater than h/2. The value 3h/4 satisfies this monotonic behavior and symmetry. Why Other Options Are Wrong: One-half of the crown rise (1/2 h): Too small; occurs nearer to the supports than quarter points. One-third of the crown rise (1/3 h): Far too small for a parabola at x = L/4. One-fourth of the crown rise (1/4 h): Incorrect by derivation; much lower than expected at quarter span. None of these: Incorrect because 3/4 h is exact. Common Pitfalls: Using a linear instead of parabolic relation for ordinates. Confusing rise at quarter points with one-half rise due to intuition rather than formula. Mixing up x with fractional span (using x = 1/4 without multiplying by L). Final Answer: Three-fourths of the crown rise (3/4 h)

Question 18

In structural analysis of beams: If the static equilibrium equations alone are insufficient to determine all support reactions for a beam, what is such a structure called?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Support reactions for beams are typically found using the three static equilibrium equations in a plane. When these equations are not enough to solve for all unknown reactions, the beam requires additional compatibility relations and is classified differently. This concept is fundamental in structural analysis and design. Given Data / Assumptions: Planar beam problem. Standard static equilibrium equations available: sum of forces in x and y directions and sum of moments. Number of unknown support reactions exceeds the number of independent equilibrium equations. Concept / Approach: A structure is called statically determinate when all reaction components and internal forces can be found solely from static equilibrium. If not, the structure is statically indeterminate and needs additional deformation-compatibility conditions (and material/section properties) to find the unknowns. Step-by-Step Solution: Count unknown reactions.Compare with available independent equilibrium equations (in 2D, generally 3).If unknowns > equations, classification → statically indeterminate. Verification / Alternative check: Typical examples: A propped cantilever has four reaction components but only three equations, hence indeterminate to degree 1. A simply supported beam has two reactions, hence determinate. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Determinate / Statically determinate: Require only equilibrium; contradicts the given condition. None of these / Partially determinate: Not standard classifications for this context. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring internal redundants introduced by fixed or continuous supports. Counting equations incorrectly (e.g., dependent equations in some geometries). Final Answer: Statically indeterminate

Question 19

Two beams of equal length carry the same maximum bending moment under the same permissible bending stress. One beam has a circular cross-section and the other a square cross-section. What is the ratio of their flexural weights (circular to square)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Flexural (bending) design often compares different cross-sections that must carry the same maximum bending moment at the same permissible bending stress. The required section modulus governs the size, and therefore the relative weight (area for unit length) follows from the geometry needed to achieve that section modulus. Given Data / Assumptions: Equal length beams subjected to the same maximum bending moment M. Same permissible bending stress, so required section modulus Z is the same. Cross-sections: circle of diameter d, and square of side a. Flexural weight proportional to cross-sectional area (for unit length and same material density). Concept / Approach: Use the section modulus Z of each shape and equate them to find the relationship between a and d. Then compute the ratio of areas A_circular / A_square, which is the ratio of flexural weights for the same bending capacity. Step-by-Step Solution: Z_circle = (π * d^3) / 32Z_square = a^3 / 6Set Z_circle = Z_square → (π * d^3) / 32 = a^3 / 6Solve for a in terms of d: a^3 = (3π/16) * d^3 → a/d = (3π/16)^(1/3)Areas: A_circle = π d^2 / 4 ; A_square = a^2 = ((3π/16)^(2/3)) * d^2Flexural weight ratio (circle/square) = A_circle / A_square = (π/4) / ( (3π/16)^(2/3) ) ≈ 1.118 Verification / Alternative check: The circular section is known to be slightly less area-efficient in flexure than the optimally oriented rectangular/square section for the same Z, so the circular beam needing marginally more area (≈ 11.8%) is reasonable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1.338, 1.228, 1.108: Do not match the computed ratio from equating section moduli and areas. 0.894: Would imply the circle is lighter than the square for same bending capacity, which contradicts the derivation. Common Pitfalls: Confusing section modulus with moment of inertia or forgetting division by extreme fiber distance. Equating areas instead of section modulus when bending capacity is the criterion. Final Answer: 1.118

Strength of Materials Questions