Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Altera (now Intel) MAX-series CPLDs use product-term macrocells grouped into Logic Array Blocks (LABs). The tools support product-term sharing/expansion to realize wider logic equations than a single macrocell can natively implement. However, the exact borrowing limits depend on family architecture and are not universally “six from each of three adjacent macrocells.”
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:While product-term sharing is real, vendor documentation specifies totals and patterns that differ across devices. Some families allow a macrocell to gain a defined number of additional product terms via expanders, but the numbers and topology constraints (which neighbor, how many, how routed) are architecture-specific. The statement’s exact figures do not represent a general rule for MAX+PLUS II across all CPLDs and are therefore unreliable as a blanket assertion.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Recognize that expansion exists but is architecture-bound.Compare to datasheets: totals and adjacency rules vary by device.Note that the claim offers specific counts not consistently documented across families.Conclude the universal claim is incorrect.Verification / Alternative check:Check the specific MAX family datasheet and the Compiler Help. You will find product-term expansion descriptions, but not a universal “6 from each of 3 neighbors” rule.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Correct: Overstates a family-independent behavior with exact counts.Family- or JTAG-conditional claims: JTAG does not govern product-term borrowing limits; limits are architectural.Common Pitfalls:Memorizing a number from one family and generalizing to all; ignoring fitter reports that show actual product-term usage.
Final Answer:Incorrect
Discussion & Comments