Gate arrays and ULSI scale: Are gate arrays considered ultra-large-scale integration (ULSI) devices that can offer on the order of hundreds of thousands of gates (or more, depending on process)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Gate arrays (including sea-of-gates and structured ASIC variants) pre-allocate arrays of transistors or gates, later customized by metal interconnect layers. Historically and in modern forms, they target large digital functions far beyond simple SSI/MSI capacities, falling into the LSI/VLSI/ULSI spectrum depending on era and process node.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • ULSI describes very high gate counts on a single die.
  • Gate arrays are fabricated with regular fabrics and customized interconnect.
  • Process scaling increases feasible gate counts dramatically.


Concept / Approach:
By leveraging pre-fabricated arrays, designers can integrate extensive logic while reducing turnaround relative to full-custom ASICs. Even older processes reached hundreds of thousands of gates; modern structured ASICs exceed that by orders of magnitude. Thus, describing gate arrays as ULSI for many applications is accurate.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Classify integration scale: SSI < MSI < LSI < VLSI < ULSI.Map gate arrays: typically VLSI to ULSI, depending on generation.Confirm capacity: hundreds of thousands to millions of equivalent gates are common historically and higher today.Conclusion: the statement is correct.


Verification / Alternative check:
Consult classic gate-array datasheets and structured ASIC literature showing large logic capacities and high I/O counts.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Incorrect: Understates the realistic capacity of gate arrays.SSI-only / analog-only: Misclassifies the technology and its use cases.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating gate arrays with small PLDs; ignoring that “gate count” metrics vary with reference cell definitions.


Final Answer:
Correct

More Questions from Programmable Logic Device

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion