GAL vs PAL — reprogrammable logic: Is it correct to describe a GAL (Generic Array Logic) device as a programmable and reprogrammable successor to a PAL (Programmable Array Logic)?

Introduction / Context:
PALs were early SPLDs that used one-time programmable fuses. GALs were later introduced to be pin-compatible with many PALs while providing EEPROM-based, electrically erasable configuration. This made GALs attractive drop-in, reprogrammable replacements in development and production.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• PAL: programmable once (fuse-based), fixed OR array with programmable AND array.
• GAL: EEPROM-based, electrically erasable and reprogrammable.
• Many GALs support multiple program/erase cycles and security features.

Concept / Approach:
The functional model of GALs is similar to PALs (sum-of-products into macrocells), but GALs add reprogrammability and often macrocell configurability (for example, registered vs combinational). Thus, labeling GALs as programmable/reprogrammable PALs captures their role and compatibility in many designs.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
GAL datasheets describe electrical reprogramming cycles, pin compatibility, and macrocell options compared with classic PAL parts.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming all SPLDs are one-time programmable; overlooking security bits and power/timing differences between PAL and GAL.

Final Answer:
Correct