In C/C++/Java-style boolean expressions, match the following operators to their meanings: (A) &&, (B) ||, (C) = — identify logical AND, logical OR, and assignment.

Introduction / Context:
Many programming languages use distinct operators for boolean logic and for assignment. Misreading these symbols is a common source of bugs. This matching task reinforces the difference between logical conjunction/disjunction and variable assignment in mainstream C-like languages.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Operator '&&': used in conditional expressions as logical AND.
• Operator '||': used as logical OR.
• Operator '=': used to assign a value to a variable (single equals is not comparison).
• Short-circuit evaluation semantics typically apply to && and ||.

Concept / Approach:
Disambiguate symbols by role: logical operators combine boolean results; assignment stores a value. Remember that equality comparison is '==' (not '='), which prevents confusing assignment with testing for equality.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider code: if (x > 0 && y > 0) {...} executes only if both comparisons are true; flag = (x > 0 || y > 0); assigns a boolean result to flag. Using a single '=' inside an if-condition would change a value and is typically flagged by compilers or linters.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• A-1, B-2, C-3: Swaps logical AND with assignment and mislabels OR.
• A-3, B-2, C-1: Interchanges AND/OR semantics.
• A-1, B-3, C-2: Assigns '=' to logical OR and '||' to assignment—both incorrect.

Common Pitfalls:

• Writing 'if (x = 1)' when you meant 'if (x == 1)', causing unintended assignment.
• Forgetting short-circuiting: in A && B, B is evaluated only if A is true; in A || B, B is evaluated only if A is false.

Final Answer:
A-2, B-3, C-1