Logical deduction – seating order behind one another Given: Martina is behind Jerome. Jerome is behind Bryant. Question: If those two facts are true, is the statement “Bryant is behind Martina” true, false, or uncertain?

Introduction / Context:
This question uses linear order in a classroom-like queue. “Behind” indicates a position farther back from the front. We must determine whether a third claim is consistent with, required by, or contradicted by the initial two.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Martina is behind Jerome.
• Jerome is behind Bryant.
• Claim to evaluate: “Bryant is behind Martina.”
• All three sit on the same straight line toward the front.

Concept / Approach:
From the two premises, the order from front to back must be: Bryant, then Jerome, then Martina. If Bryant is ahead of Jerome, and Jerome is ahead of Martina, Bryant cannot be behind Martina.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Translate: “A behind B” ⇒ B ahead of A.2) From Jerome behind Bryant ⇒ Bryant ahead of Jerome.3) From Martina behind Jerome ⇒ Jerome ahead of Martina.4) Chain: Bryant ahead of Jerome ahead of Martina.5) Conclusion: “Bryant behind Martina” contradicts the forced order ⇒ False.

Verification / Alternative check:
Visualize three desks in a column; mark them Front → Back as B, J, M. The third statement is incompatible with this arrangement.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• True: Directly contradicts the established order.
• Uncertain: There is no ambiguity; the order is fixed.
• Both true and false: Not a valid outcome in a consistent linear order.

Common Pitfalls:
Reversing “behind” and “ahead” or thinking of circular arrangements. The context implies a straight sequence.

Final Answer:
False