Mall size comparison logic: given 'Kingston has more stores than the Galleria' and 'Four Corners has fewer stores than the Galleria', evaluate 'Kingston has more stores than Four Corners'

Given data

• K > G (Kingston > Galleria)
• F < G (Four Corners < Galleria)

Concept/Approach (why this method)

Transitivity on inequalities: if K > G and G > F, then K > F.

Step-by-Step deduction
1) From F < G, infer G > F.2) With K > G, chain to get K > F.

Verification/Alternative

Example counts (K=120, G=100, F=80) satisfy all statements and confirm the conclusion.

Common pitfalls

• Assuming we need exact store counts; ordinal relations suffice.

Final Answer
True