Relative apartment pricing logic: with Riverdale < Gaslight Commons and Livingston Gate > Gaslight Commons, determine whether 'Livingston Gate costs the most among the three' is correct

Given data

• R < G (Riverdale cheaper than Gaslight Commons)
• L > G (Livingston Gate pricier than Gaslight Commons)

Concept/Approach (why this method)

Order chaining: if L > G and G > R, then L > G and L > R → L is the most expensive of the three.

Step-by-Step deduction1) From R < G, we have G > R.2) Combine with L > G ⇒ L > G and L > R.3) Therefore, Livingston Gate is the costliest among {R, G, L}.

Verification/Alternative

Plug sample numbers (R=10, G=15, L=20) → statement holds.

Common pitfalls

• Thinking we need a direct L vs. R statement; it is implied via transitivity.

Final AnswerTrue