Examine the logical independence of the classes Trucks, Scooters, and the property Fly.
- Premise 1: All trucks fly, so Trucks ⊆ Fly.
- Premise 2: Some scooters fly, so Scooters ∩ Fly ≠ ∅.
- Conclusions: I. All trucks are scooters. II. Some scooters do not fly.
Concept/ApproachSubset to the property Fly does not create a subset relation between Trucks and Scooters, and existence of flying scooters does not imply existence of non flying scooters.Testing conclusion INothing links Trucks to Scooters. Trucks could be entirely separate from Scooters yet still fly. Hence I does not follow.Testing conclusion IIWe only know some scooters do fly. The set of scooters could all be flyers, so the existence of non flying scooters is not guaranteed. Hence II does not follow.Verification/AlternativeModel: Trucks = {t1}, Scooters = {s1}, Fly = {t1, s1}. Both premises hold; I is false and II is false.Common pitfallsReading extra relations between subject classes that are not supplied by the premises.Final AnswerNeither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments