Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: It changes the x-intercept (moves it toward zero) while the y-intercept remains unchanged.
Explanation:
Introduction:Competitive inhibition is a fundamental concept in enzyme kinetics. On a Lineweaver–Burk (double-reciprocal) plot, competitive inhibitors alter specific parameters in a predictable way. This question checks recognition of which intercept and slope are affected.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In competitive inhibition, Vmax is unchanged because sufficiently high substrate concentrations can outcompete the inhibitor. However, the apparent affinity decreases, so Km,app increases. On the Lineweaver–Burk plot, the y-intercept equals 1/Vmax (unchanged) and the x-intercept equals −1/Km,app (moves toward zero as Km,app increases). The slope equals Km,app/Vmax, which therefore increases.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify parameters: y-intercept = 1/Vmax; x-intercept = −1/Km.2) Competitive inhibition leaves Vmax unchanged ⇒ y-intercept unchanged.3) Km increases to Km,app ⇒ x-intercept magnitude decreases (moves toward zero).4) Slope = Km/Vmax increases because Km increases, Vmax constant.Verification / Alternative check:
Graphical families of lines for competitive inhibition intersect at the same y-intercept but have different slopes, confirming y-intercept constancy and x-intercept shift.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A: Both intercepts do not shift; y-intercept stays constant. B: There is no uniform horizontal shift with intercepts fixed. D: Slope increases; it does not remain unchanged. E: y-intercept (1/Vmax) does not decrease since Vmax is unchanged.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing competitive with non-competitive or uncompetitive patterns; forgetting that only apparent Km changes in competitive inhibition.
Final Answer:
It changes the x-intercept (moves it toward zero) while the y-intercept remains unchanged.
Discussion & Comments