Simple enzyme reaction rate law: for a Michaelis–Menten system, which expression correctly gives the rate of product formation rp in terms of maximum rate rmax and substrate concentration Cs?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: rp = rmax * Cs / (Km + Cs)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The Michaelis–Menten equation is a cornerstone of enzyme kinetics, relating reaction velocity to substrate concentration under quasi-steady-state conditions. Recognizing the correct algebraic form prevents common mistakes when fitting kinetic data or interpreting saturation behavior.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Single-substrate irreversible scheme in initial-rate conditions.
  • Parameters: rmax (Vmax), Km (Michaelis constant), Cs (substrate concentration).
  • Product inhibition and reverse reactions are negligible at initial times.


Concept / Approach:
From QSSA and enzyme conservation, the initial rate of product formation is rp = (rmax * Cs) / (Km + Cs). This captures first-order dependence at low Cs (Cs « Km) and zero-order behavior at high Cs (Cs » Km), aligning with saturation kinetics observed experimentally.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Write the Michaelis–Menten form: v = Vmax * S / (Km + S).2) Map variables: rp ↔ v, rmax ↔ Vmax, Cs ↔ S.3) Conclude rp = rmax * Cs / (Km + Cs) as the correct expression.4) Check limiting cases to validate behavior.


Verification / Alternative check:
Plotting rp vs Cs yields a rectangular hyperbola approaching rmax; linear transformations (e.g., Eadie–Hofstee) confirm the parameter relationships.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Expressions using CES or Cp in the denominator are not standard forms for initial-rate Michaelis–Menten.
  • rmax * (Km + Cs) / Cs inverts the dependence and gives incorrect limits.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing Vmax with kcat or substituting product concentration into the denominator; forgetting units consistency (rate vs concentration/time).


Final Answer:
rp = rmax * Cs / (Km + Cs)

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion