Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: All the above.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In S.I., work and energy share the unit joule (J). Since 1 J = 1 Nm, the same dimensional product appears in torque calculations. However, conventionally engineers write torque in Nm (not J) to distinguish the vectorial, moment-like nature of torque from scalar energy or work, even though the dimensions match.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Use the work definition W = F * s (component along displacement) and torque definition M = F * d (perpendicular distance). Both are force times distance, but they represent different physical concepts. Hence, the shared unit does not imply identical physical meaning.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Dimensional analysis: N = kgm/s^2, so Nm = kgm^2/s^2. This dimension appears in both torque and energy computations, confirming the equivalence of units despite different physical interpretations.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
All the above.
Discussion & Comments