Which of the following correctly lists the three Indians who made it to MIT Technology Review’s “Innovators Under 35” list in 2017?

Introduction / Context:
MIT Technology Review’s “Innovators Under 35” list highlights young researchers and entrepreneurs who are shaping the future of technology and science. In 2017, several Indians and people of Indian origin featured on this list. General knowledge questions often ask you to recognise these names and their achievements.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The year is 2017 and the list is “Innovators Under 35” by MIT Technology Review.
• The names given are Suchi Saria, Radha Boya, and Neha Narkhede.
• Option D, “All of the above”, suggests that all three names might simultaneously be part of the list.
• We are to identify which option correctly represents the Indians on that list.

Concept / Approach:
All three listed individuals are known for significant work in their fields: healthcare analytics, nanotechnology or materials science, and data-streaming infrastructure. When an “All of the above” option appears alongside individually correct names, we should recall whether each person independently received the honour in the same year. For 2017, exam-oriented GK summaries mention all three names together as Indian or Indian-origin innovators on the list.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognise Suchi Saria for her work at the intersection of artificial intelligence and healthcare, especially predictive analytics for critical care. Step 2: Remember Radha Boya for her contributions in nanoscience and related innovative research areas. Step 3: Recall Neha Narkhede as a co-creator of Apache Kafka and co-founder of Confluent, a major figure in data-streaming technology. Step 4: Check exam-oriented current affairs: all three names were highlighted as Indians or Indian-origin innovators featured in MIT Technology Review’s “Innovators Under 35” list in 2017. Step 5: Therefore, the option that correctly captures this fact is “All of the above”.

Verification / Alternative check:
If you revisit GK magazines or reputable technology news sources summarising the 2017 winners, you will find each of these individuals discussed in the context of the MIT Technology Review list. None of them are incorrectly included; they each meet the under-35 criterion and are recognised for high-impact work in technology and science. That independent confirmation for each name strengthens the conclusion that all three together form the correct set.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Suchi Saria only: This option ignores the presence of Radha Boya and Neha Narkhede, who were also recognised. Radha Boya only: Similarly incomplete, as it omits the other two innovators. Neha Narkhede only: Again, this focuses on a single individual and fails to represent all Indian names on the list.

Common Pitfalls:
A typical error is to assume that if one name is definitely correct, the safest answer is that single name rather than “All of the above”. Another pitfall is not carefully reading current affairs sections that highlight multiple honorees together. When you see grouped coverage naming several Indians on an international list, remember the cluster, not just one or two standout names. This prevents you from underestimating how many of the options are correct.

Final Answer:
In 2017, Suchi Saria, Radha Boya, and Neha Narkhede all appeared on MIT Technology Review’s “Innovators Under 35” list, so the correct option is All of the above.