Question 1

For a rocket or spacecraft trying to leave the Earth without further propulsion, what is the approximate escape velocity from the Earth surface in km/s?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of the concept of escape velocity in gravitation. Escape velocity is the minimum speed an object must have at a planet surface so that it can move away to an infinite distance without falling back, assuming no further thrust is applied and neglecting air resistance. Knowing the approximate value of escape velocity from the Earth is important in basic astronomy, space science and competitive exam physics. Given Data / Assumptions: The object is a rocket or spacecraft launched from the surface of the Earth. No additional propulsion is applied after the launch speed is imparted. Air resistance is neglected to use the ideal theoretical formula. Standard values for the gravitational constant, mass of the Earth and radius of the Earth are assumed. We are asked for the approximate numeric value of escape velocity in km/s. Concept / Approach: Escape velocity is derived from energy conservation. To escape, a body must have enough initial kinetic energy to overcome the gravitational potential energy of the Earth. At the surface, the kinetic energy is (1/2) * m * v^2 and the gravitational potential energy relative to infinity is G * M * m / R, where G is the universal gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, R is the radius of the Earth and m is the mass of the rocket. Setting the kinetic energy equal to the required potential energy gives the formula v_e = sqrt(2 * G * M / R). This formula shows that escape velocity does not depend on the mass of the rocket itself. Substituting Earth data gives an approximate value of about 11.2 km/s. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the energy conservation condition for escape: initial kinetic energy = gravitational potential energy needed to reach infinite distance. Step 2: Use (1/2) * m * v_e^2 = G * M * m / R, where v_e is escape velocity. Step 3: Cancel the mass m of the rocket from both sides, showing escape velocity is independent of rocket mass. Step 4: Rearrange to get v_e^2 = 2 * G * M / R, so v_e = sqrt(2 * G * M / R). Step 5: Substitute typical values: G approximately 6.67 * 10^-11 N m^2/kg^2, M approximately 5.97 * 10^24 kg and R approximately 6.37 * 10^6 m. Step 6: Compute the result to get v_e about 11.2 * 10^3 m/s, which is 11.2 km/s. Step 7: Compare this with the options and identify 11.2 km/s as the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Many standard physics textbooks and reliable space science references quote the escape velocity from the Earth surface as approximately 11.2 km/s. Space missions typically use multistage rockets that provide continuous thrust and do not rely on achieving exactly this single impulse speed, but the value remains an important benchmark. Also, if you compute Earth orbital speed in low Earth orbit (around 7.9 km/s), the escape velocity is higher by a factor of about sqrt(2), which supports the numerical value near 11.2 km/s. These independent checks confirm that 11.2 km/s is the correct approximate escape speed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 10.2 km/s is lower than the required speed and would not allow a rocket to reach infinity without additional thrust; gravity would eventually pull it back. 12.2 km/s and 13.2 km/s are higher than the theoretical minimum and are not the standard quoted escape velocity value for Earth, even though speeds above 11.2 km/s would also allow escape. Only 11.2 km/s matches the widely accepted theoretical value derived from Earth mass and radius. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse escape velocity with the orbital velocity required for a circular orbit close to the Earth. Orbital velocity in low Earth orbit is about 7.9 km/s, which is significantly less than 11.2 km/s. Another misconception is to think that escape velocity depends on the mass of the rocket, but the derivation shows that mass cancels out. Remember that escape velocity depends only on the mass and radius of the planet or body from which the object is escaping, and for Earth this value is approximately 11.2 km/s. Final Answer: The approximate escape velocity from the Earth surface is 11.2 km/s.

Question 2

In metal joining by brazing, which flux is most commonly used to clean the metal surfaces and promote proper flow of the molten filler metal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Brazing is a metal joining process in which a filler metal with a lower melting point than the base metals is melted and distributed between closely fitted surfaces. For brazing to be successful, the metal surfaces must be clean and free from oxides so that the molten filler metal can wet and flow over them. A flux is used to remove oxides and prevent further oxidation during heating. This question tests your knowledge of the common flux material used in brazing operations in basic manufacturing and welding technology. Given Data / Assumptions: The joining process under discussion is brazing, not soldering or welding. A flux is required to assist in cleaning the metal surfaces and improving wetting of the filler metal. Options include ammonium chloride, borax, zinc chloride and resin plus alcohol. We assume typical ferrous and non ferrous metals used in general workshop practice. Concept / Approach: In brazing, the joint is heated to a temperature above the melting point of the filler metal but below the melting point of the base metals. Oxide films and surface contamination can prevent proper wetting of the base metal by the molten filler. Fluxes are chemical compounds that dissolve these oxides and protect the surfaces from further oxidation. Borax, which is sodium tetraborate, is widely used as a flux in brazing and forge work because it melts and dissolves metal oxides efficiently at brazing temperatures. Ammonium chloride and zinc chloride are more commonly associated with soldering and certain cleaning processes, and resin based fluxes are typically used in soft soldering of electronic components. Therefore, borax is the commonly used brazing flux among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that brazing uses a filler metal with melting point higher than in soft soldering but lower than that of the base metals. Step 2: Recognise that surface oxides on the metal workpieces interfere with proper bonding and must be removed or neutralised. Step 3: Understand that a suitable flux is applied before or during heating to dissolve oxides and improve wetting by the filler metal. Step 4: Note that borax has a long history as a general purpose high temperature flux in brazing and forge welding because it becomes glassy and dissolves metal oxides effectively. Step 5: Ammonium chloride and zinc chloride mixtures are more common in soft soldering or cleaning operations at lower temperatures. Step 6: Resin plus alcohol fluxes are typical in electronics soldering, not in higher temperature brazing processes. Step 7: Therefore, among the given options, borax is the flux most commonly used in brazing. Verification / Alternative check: Standard manufacturing and welding textbooks usually describe borax based fluxes as the preferred choice for many brazing applications, especially for ferrous alloys and copper alloys. In traditional blacksmith practice, a mixture based on borax is sprinkled on red hot steel surfaces before forge welding and brazing. Manufacturers of commercial brazing fluxes often list borax and boric acid as primary ingredients. These widely documented uses confirm that borax is the most commonly used flux in brazing operations. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ammonium chloride is used in some soldering fluxes and cleaning powders but is not the standard general purpose brazing flux. Zinc chloride is a component in certain soldering fluxes, particularly for galvanised surfaces, but is not the usual choice for brazing at higher temperatures. Resin plus alcohol flux is mainly used for soft soldering, especially in electronics, where low temperature and non corrosive residues are important. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse soldering and brazing because both involve a filler metal with lower melting point than the base metal. However, the temperatures and materials are different, so the fluxes used are also different. Resin based and zinc chloride fluxes are more typical of soft soldering, while borax based fluxes suit the higher temperatures of brazing. Remembering that borax is linked to high temperature joining and forge work makes it easier to select the correct answer in such questions. Final Answer: In brazing, the flux commonly used to clean metal surfaces and help the filler metal flow is Borax.

Question 3

In the manufacturing of gears, which of the following processes is specifically classified as a gear finishing operation used to improve surface finish and accuracy of the gear teeth?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Gear manufacturing involves several stages, starting from rough cutting of gear teeth and ending with finishing operations that improve accuracy and surface quality. The basic tooth form may be produced by processes like hobbing, shaping or milling, but to obtain smooth, quiet running gears with long service life, finishing operations are used. This question tests whether you can distinguish between gear generating processes and gear finishing processes in basic production engineering. Given Data / Assumptions: We are concerned with gears and operations applied to their teeth. Options include burnishing, hobbing, shaping and milling. The term finishing operation refers to operations done after the basic tooth geometry has been created. The goal of finishing is to improve surface finish, accuracy and sometimes fatigue strength. Concept / Approach: Hobbing, shaping and milling are primarily generating or cutting operations used to produce the gear tooth form from a blank. They remove significant amounts of material and define the basic geometry of the teeth. In contrast, finishing operations, such as burnishing, grinding, honing and lapping, mainly refine an already formed surface. Burnishing is a cold working process in which a hardened roller or tool is pressed against the surface and moved over it. This plastically deforms the peaks into the valleys, improving surface finish and sometimes increasing surface hardness and fatigue life. In the context of gears, burnishing can be carried out on teeth as a finishing operation. Thus, burnishing is the correct answer among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify which processes are used mainly to create the gear tooth form from a blank. Step 2: Recognise that hobbing is a widely used generating process to cut the teeth using a hob tool. Step 3: Understand that shaping can also be used to generate gear teeth, especially for internal gears. Step 4: Note that milling can be used to cut individual gear teeth with a form or end mill, but it is still a rough cutting process. Step 5: Burnishing, on the other hand, does not primarily remove material; instead, it smooths and work hardens the surface by plastic deformation. Step 6: In gear production, burnishing can be applied after tooth cutting to improve surface finish and accuracy, making it a finishing operation. Step 7: Therefore, among the listed processes, burnishing is the one correctly classified as a gear finishing operation. Verification / Alternative check: Manufacturing references typically divide gear operations into roughing (such as casting and forging), cutting or generating (hobbing, shaping, milling, broaching) and finishing (grinding, honing, lapping, burnishing). When high precision and low noise gears are required, finishing operations are essential after basic tooth cutting. Burnishing is often mentioned as a finishing technique for both cylindrical surfaces and gear teeth, while hobbing, shaping and milling are clearly described as primary cutting processes. This literature support confirms that burnishing is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hobbing is a gear generating process used to cut gear teeth from a blank and is not primarily a finishing operation. Shaping is also a generating or cutting process that forms gear teeth, especially for internal or special gears. Milling is a general machining process used to cut material and form the gear tooth but is not classified as a microscopic finishing process. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that any machining process which gives a smooth surface is a finishing operation. However, in gear technology, the classification depends on whether the process primarily generates the shape or refines it. Learners should remember that hobbing, shaping and milling define the basic tooth geometry, while processes like grinding, honing, lapping and burnishing are used afterwards to perfect the teeth. Keeping this hierarchy in mind helps in quickly identifying burnishing as a finishing operation in exam questions. Final Answer: The gear finishing operation among the given choices is Burnishing.

Question 4

In the non traditional machining process called Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM), material removal from the workpiece takes place mainly due to which combination of physical phenomena?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is an important non traditional machining process used to shape hard and difficult to machine materials using electrical sparks rather than mechanical cutting forces. Understanding how material is actually removed in EDM is essential in manufacturing and production engineering. This question asks you to identify the correct physical mechanisms responsible for material removal in EDM. Given Data / Assumptions: The machining process under discussion is Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM). EDM uses repetitive electrical discharges between a tool electrode and a conductive workpiece, separated by a dielectric fluid. The options include various combinations of erosion, cavitation, melting, evaporation and corrosion. We assume conventional EDM, not ultrasonic or chemical machining. Concept / Approach: In EDM, a series of rapid electrical discharges occur between the tool and the workpiece in a dielectric medium. Each discharge produces a tiny plasma channel and extremely high local temperatures at the point of impact, often in the range of several thousand degrees Celsius. At these temperatures, a small volume of the workpiece material melts and part of it even vaporises. The expanding vapour bubble and the collapse of the plasma channel then remove this molten and evaporated material from the crater. Thus, the primary mechanisms of material removal are thermal in nature, specifically melting and evaporation due to intense localized heating, not corrosion or cavitation in the usual fluid dynamic sense. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that EDM requires the workpiece and tool to be electrically conductive and uses a pulsed DC power supply. Step 2: Recognise that when a voltage is applied, dielectric breakdown occurs and an electrical spark jumps across the small gap between tool and workpiece. Step 3: Each spark creates a plasma channel with extremely high temperature and energy concentrated in a tiny region of the workpiece surface. Step 4: This intense local heating causes a small volume of the workpiece material to melt and some portion to evaporate. Step 5: The sudden expansion and collapse of the vapour bubble along with the dielectric flushing action remove this molten and evaporated material as tiny debris particles. Step 6: No significant chemical corrosion is involved in the primary removal mechanism, and cavitation is not the main effect the way it is in ultrasonic or hydrodynamic processes. Step 7: Therefore, material removal in EDM occurs mainly by melting and evaporation. Verification / Alternative check: Metallographic examination of EDM machined surfaces reveals recast layers and small craters characteristic of rapid melting and solidification. The presence of a heat affected zone and microstructural changes near the surface supports the conclusion that very high temperatures were involved. Process models and textbooks consistently describe EDM as a thermal erosion process dominated by melting and vaporisation of material due to electrical discharges. While flushing and minor mechanical effects help carry away the molten droplets, the core mechanisms are still melting and evaporation, not cavitation or corrosion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Erosion and cavitation suggests a purely mechanical fluid dynamic mechanism similar to hydraulic cavitation, which is not the main process in EDM. Cavitation and evaporation again emphasises fluid effects more typical of ultrasonic machining rather than the thermal spark erosion of EDM. Melting and corrosion is incorrect because corrosion involves chemical reaction over longer times and is not the rapid, spark based removal observed in EDM. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes loosely use the term erosion for any material removal, which can cause confusion. In EDM, the word spark erosion is sometimes used, but the detailed mechanism behind that erosion is thermal, involving melting and vaporisation. It is important not to confuse EDM with processes like chemical machining or ultrasonic machining, where corrosion or cavitation may dominate. Remember that EDM is a thermal, non contact machining process relying on repeated electrical discharges to melt and evaporate material. Final Answer: In Electrical Discharge Machining, material is removed mainly by melting and evaporation of the workpiece at the spark sites.

Question 5

Cryogenic engines, which use very low temperature liquid propellants such as liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, are primarily used in which field of modern technology?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The term cryogenic refers to extremely low temperatures, typically below about minus 150 degree Celsius. Engines that use cryogenic propellants operate with fuels and oxidisers stored in this very low temperature range, such as liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. This question tests your general science and technology knowledge about where such cryogenic engines are mostly applied in practice. Given Data / Assumptions: Cryogenic engines operate on cryogenic propellants like liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. They are designed to work with very cold, high energy density fluids. Options mention frost free refrigerators, sub marine propulsion, superconductivity research and rocket technology. We assume typical large scale engineering applications rather than small laboratory setups. Concept / Approach: Cryogenic engines are most prominently associated with space launch vehicles. In many modern rockets, especially upper stages, cryogenic rocket engines burn liquid hydrogen as fuel and liquid oxygen as oxidiser to produce very high specific impulse. The use of these cryogenic propellants allows rockets to achieve greater efficiency compared to conventional room temperature propellants. Although cryogenic cooling is indeed used in superconductivity research and refrigeration, the term cryogenic engine specifically refers to rocket engines in the context of competitive exams and general knowledge. Refrigerators use refrigeration cycles, not cryogenic engines, and submarine propulsion relies on diesel electric or nuclear power, not cryogenic liquid hydrogen oxygen engines. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen are common cryogenic propellants because they are stored at very low temperatures to remain in liquid form. Step 2: Note that rocket engines using these propellants combust liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen to produce hot gases that generate thrust. Step 3: Understand that these engines are called cryogenic rocket engines due to the cryogenic nature of the stored fluids. Step 4: Recognise that frost free refrigerators do use low temperature systems but are based on vapour compression refrigeration, not high thrust cryogenic engines. Step 5: Realise that submarine propulsion predominantly uses nuclear reactors or diesel engines driving electric motors, not cryogenic LH2 LOX engines. Step 6: Research in superconductivity does rely on cryogenic cooling to reach very low temperatures, but this involves cryostats and cooling systems, not engines in the usual sense. Step 7: Therefore, the field where cryogenic engines are specifically and widely used is rocket technology. Verification / Alternative check: Famous space programs such as those of NASA, ESA, ISRO and others clearly describe cryogenic stages in their launch vehicles. For example, upper stages powered by cryogenic engines using liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen are highlighted as advanced features that improve payload capacity. The development of indigenous cryogenic engine technology is considered a major milestone in any space programme. In contrast, domestic refrigerators, submarines and superconductivity experiments, while they may use low temperature technology, are not generally described as using cryogenic engines. This confirms the association of cryogenic engines with rocket technology. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Frost free refrigerators use vapour compression refrigeration cycles with refrigerants, not high thrust cryogenic engines burning liquid hydrogen and oxygen. Sub marine propulsion systems rely on diesel electric power or nuclear reactors, and they do not commonly use cryogenic rocket engines. Researches in superconductivity need cryogenic cooling systems but not propulsion engines; they use cryostats, liquid helium or nitrogen baths instead. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse the general term cryogenic, which simply refers to low temperatures, with the more specific term cryogenic engine. While many technologies use cryogenic temperatures, engines that actively produce thrust using cryogenic propellants are almost exclusively associated with rockets. To avoid confusion, remember that refrigerators and scientific instruments have cryogenic cooling, but space launch vehicles have cryogenic rocket engines. Final Answer: Cryogenic engines are used mainly in rocket technology, where they burn very low temperature liquid propellants to provide high efficiency thrust.

Question 6

In astrophysics, one light year is the distance that light travels in vacuum in one year. Numerically, one light year is approximately equal to which of the following orders of magnitude in metres?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In astronomy, distances between stars and galaxies are enormous, so everyday units like kilometre or metre are not convenient. The light year is a commonly used astronomical distance unit defined as the distance that light travels in vacuum in one year. This question tests your familiarity with the approximate size of a light year expressed in metres using powers of ten notation. Given Data / Assumptions: Light travels in vacuum at a speed of approximately 3 * 10^8 m/s. One year is taken as about 365 days for the purpose of order of magnitude calculations. We want the approximate distance in metres that light covers in one year. Options are given in the form 10^12 m, 10^16 m, 10^11 m and 10^13 m. Concept / Approach: Distance is equal to speed multiplied by time. For a light year, we multiply the speed of light by the number of seconds in one year. While a precise value includes leap years and more precise timekeeping, for competitive exams an order of magnitude estimate is sufficient. The important point is that the resulting distance is closer to 10^16 m than to any of the smaller powers of ten listed. The commonly quoted value is about 9.46 * 10^15 m, which is closest to 10^16 m when rounded to one significant figure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the speed of light in vacuum as c approximately equal to 3 * 10^8 m/s. Step 2: Estimate the number of seconds in one year: 1 year approximately equals 365 days, each day has 24 hours, each hour 3600 seconds. Step 3: Compute time in seconds: t approximately equal to 365 * 24 * 3600. Step 4: For order of magnitude, 365 is roughly 3.65 * 10^2, 24 is about 2.4 * 10^1 and 3600 is 3.6 * 10^3. Step 5: Multiply: t approximately equal to (3.65 * 2.4 * 3.6) * 10^(2+1+3) seconds. Step 6: The numeric product 3.65 * 2.4 * 3.6 is roughly between 30 and 35, so t is about 3 * 10^1 * 10^6 equal to 3 * 10^7 seconds, which matches the known rough value of about 3.15 * 10^7 seconds per year. Step 7: Distance for one light year is then d = c * t approximately equal to (3 * 10^8) * (3 * 10^7) equal to 9 * 10^15 m, which is commonly rounded to about 10^16 m. Verification / Alternative check: Standard astronomy references usually quote 1 light year as approximately 9.46 * 10^15 m. When writing distances in a simple multiple choice format with approximate orders of magnitude, this is closest to 10^16 m. The other options 10^11 m, 10^12 m and 10^13 m are far too small; 10^13 m, for example, is only one thousandth of a light year. Distances within our solar system, such as the separation between the Sun and Pluto, are measured in astronomical units, which are much smaller than a light year. This confirms that the only reasonable choice for the distance of one light year is about 10^16 m. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 10^11 m is only one hundred billion metres, which is far less than the distance light travels in a year and is closer to planetary scale distances. 10^12 m is one trillion metres, still many orders of magnitude smaller than a light year. 10^13 m is ten trillion metres, which is about one thousandth of a light year and is still too small. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes underestimate astronomical distances because powers of ten can be confusing. Another mistake is confusing light year with time, thinking it is a measure of time rather than distance. Always remember that a light year is a unit of distance defined by how far light travels in one year. Associating the approximate numeric value 10^16 m with one light year helps in answering many astronomy questions quickly. Final Answer: One light year is approximately equal to a distance of order 10^16 m.

Question 7

In basic mechanics, speed of a body in a specified direction is known by which physical term?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests a simple but fundamental idea from mechanics: the distinction between scalar and vector quantities. Speed is a scalar that tells us how fast an object is moving but not the direction, whereas velocity includes both magnitude and direction. Understanding this difference is crucial for correctly analysing motion, forces and kinematic equations in physics. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase speed in a given direction is used in the question. We want the standard physics term that corresponds to this description. Options include velocity, torque, acceleration and displacement. We assume basic Newtonian mechanics in a straight line or plane. Concept / Approach: Speed is defined as the rate of change of distance with respect to time and has magnitude only. When the direction of motion is also specified, the quantity becomes a vector called velocity, which is the rate of change of displacement with time. Torque is related to rotational effect of a force about an axis. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time. Displacement is the change in position of an object. Therefore, the correct term for speed in a given direction is velocity. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that speed is a scalar quantity defined as distance travelled per unit time. Step 2: Recognise that when we add direction to speed, we are describing a vector quantity. Step 3: In physics, the vector quantity equal to speed with a specific direction is called velocity. Step 4: Understand that torque measures the turning effect of a force and is unrelated to linear speed or direction. Step 5: Note that acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, not the same as speed in a direction. Step 6: Displacement describes a change in position and is not a rate; it does not refer to speed. Step 7: Therefore, the appropriate physical term for speed in a given direction is velocity. Verification / Alternative check: In kinematics, equations like v = u + a * t and s = u * t + (1/2) * a * t^2 use v and u to denote velocity, which has both magnitude and direction. For example, an object moving east at 10 m/s has a velocity of 10 m/s east, which includes direction. If we ignore the east part and only say 10 m/s, then we are talking about speed. This consistent usage across textbooks and problems confirms that velocity is correctly described as speed in a given direction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Torque is a measure of rotational effect and has units of newton metre, not m/s. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity and has units of m/s^2, not m/s. Displacement is a vector describing change in position, measured in metres, and is not a rate of motion. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up speed and velocity in everyday language because people often use the term speed when they formally mean velocity. In physics, it is important to keep the terms distinct. Speed only tells you how fast you are moving, while velocity tells you both how fast and in what direction. Remembering that the phrase speed in a specified direction is essentially the textbook definition of velocity will help you recall the correct term in problems. Final Answer: Speed in a given direction is called Velocity.

Question 8

In fluid mechanics and process industries, a rotameter is an instrument used to measure which quantity of a flowing fluid?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Many industrial processes involve the controlled movement of liquids and gases through pipes and equipment. Measuring how much fluid is flowing is essential for process control and safety. Rotameters are commonly used flow measuring devices in laboratories and industries. This question tests whether you know what basic quantity a rotameter measures in fluid systems. Given Data / Assumptions: The instrument named is a rotameter. It is used in piping systems with fluids flowing through them. Options mention vortex flow, density of fluids, velocity of fluid in pipes and flow of fluids. We assume standard industrial and laboratory usage of a rotameter. Concept / Approach: A rotameter is a variable area flowmeter consisting of a tapered vertical tube and a float. Fluid flows upward through the tube and lifts the float until the upward drag force balances the weight of the float. The height of the float is then related to the volumetric flow rate of the fluid. Rotameters are typically calibrated in units of volume per unit time, such as litres per minute. Therefore, they are used to measure the flow rate of fluids, not directly density, velocity or vortex characteristics. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Visualise a rotameter as a transparent tapered tube mounted vertically with a float inside. Step 2: When fluid flows upward through the tube, it pushes the float up until forces reach equilibrium. Step 3: The position of the float depends on the flow rate of the fluid, because a higher flow produces a greater drag force. Step 4: The tube is marked with a scale so that the height of the float can be read directly in flow rate units. Step 5: This shows that the primary function of a rotameter is to measure the rate of flow of a fluid, often volumetric flow. Step 6: Although fluid density and viscosity affect calibration, the instrument is not used primarily as a densitometer. Step 7: Therefore, among the options given, flow of fluids is the correct quantity measured by a rotameter. Verification / Alternative check: Instrumentation handbooks and process control manuals usually classify rotameters under variable area flowmeters. Their technical specifications focus on flow ranges in volume per unit time and on allowable fluid properties. Other instruments are used to measure density (densitometers), velocity (pitot tubes, ultrasonic meters) or vortex behaviour (vortex shedding flowmeters). In common industrial practice, a rotameter is always associated with measuring the volumetric flow rate, confirming that it is a flow measuring device. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vortex flow refers to flow with vortices and is measured by vortex flowmeters, not by rotameters. Density of fluids is measured by densitometers, hydrometers or other devices, not typically by rotameters. Velocity of fluid in pipes is usually determined by pitot tubes, electromagnetic or ultrasonic flowmeters, rather than by rotameters, which measure overall flow rate. Common Pitfalls: Because flow rate is related to velocity and pipe cross sectional area, some learners may think of a rotameter as a velocity meter. While it is true that velocity influences the float position, the instrument is calibrated to show volumetric flow rate rather than local velocity. Remembering the phrase variable area flowmeter for a rotameter can help you connect it directly with flow measurement instead of velocity or density measurement. Final Answer: A rotameter is used to measure the flow of fluids, typically as a volumetric flow rate.

Question 9

According to classical mechanics, the magnitude of centrifugal force on a body moving in a circular path increases with which of the following (assuming mass and radius of the path remain constant)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: When a body moves in a circular path, it experiences a centripetal acceleration towards the centre of the circle. In a rotating reference frame, an apparent outward force called centrifugal force is considered. The magnitude of this force depends on the motion parameters. This question checks whether you understand which type of physical quantity influences the size of centrifugal force when mass and radius are fixed. Given Data / Assumptions: A body of constant mass moves in a circular path of fixed radius. We are interested in how centrifugal force changes with other physical quantities. Options include temperature, pressure, acceleration and humidity. We consider uniform circular motion under classical mechanics. Concept / Approach: In uniform circular motion, the centripetal acceleration a_c needed to keep an object moving in a circle of radius r with linear speed v is given by a_c = v^2 / r. The corresponding centripetal force is F_c = m * a_c = m * v^2 / r. In a rotating frame, the outward centrifugal force has the same magnitude. If the angular speed or linear speed increases while mass and radius remain constant, the centripetal acceleration and therefore the force increase. Thus, centrifugal force increases with the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration. Temperature, pressure and humidity are thermodynamic or environmental properties and do not directly enter the expression for centrifugal force in this simple mechanical model. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the formula for centripetal acceleration in circular motion: a_c = v^2 / r, where v is linear speed and r is radius. Step 2: Express the corresponding centripetal force as F_c = m * a_c = m * v^2 / r. Step 3: Recognise that in a rotating reference frame, centrifugal force has the same magnitude as centripetal force but acts outward. Step 4: For fixed mass m and radius r, the only variable that affects F_c is v or equivalently a_c. Step 5: As speed v increases, the centripetal acceleration a_c increases, and therefore the centrifugal force also increases. Step 6: Acceleration is the quantity in the options that directly relates to this effect, since F is proportional to acceleration. Step 7: Temperature, pressure and humidity may affect fluid properties in some advanced cases, but they are not part of the basic expression for centrifugal force. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a stone tied to a string and whirled in a circle. When you increase the speed of rotation, you feel a stronger pull on your hand, indicating an increase in the force associated with circular motion. That increased pull corresponds to a larger centripetal acceleration and therefore a larger centrifugal force in the rotating frame. No change in temperature, pressure or humidity is needed to observe this effect; it depends purely on the acceleration associated with circular motion. This simple demonstration confirms that centrifugal force increases with acceleration. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Temperature is a measure of thermal energy and does not appear in the basic formula for centripetal or centrifugal force. Pressure is force per unit area in fluids and is unrelated to the mechanical expression F = m * v^2 / r for circular motion. Humidity describes moisture content in air and does not directly influence centrifugal force in the classical mechanics formula. Common Pitfalls: In more complex systems involving rotating fluids or atmospheric phenomena, temperature and pressure can affect density and flow patterns, which may change forces indirectly. However, at the level of basic physics tested in such questions, you should focus on the direct mathematical relationship. Remember that centrifugal force magnitude is directly proportional to centripetal acceleration and depends on mass, radius and speed, not on thermal or environmental variables. This helps you choose acceleration as the correct answer quickly. Final Answer: For a body moving in a circular path with fixed mass and radius, centrifugal force increases with acceleration associated with the circular motion.

Question 10

In basic physics, the rate of doing work or transferring energy per unit time is called what physical quantity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on a fundamental definition in mechanics and energy. Work and energy describe how much change has occurred, while power tells us how fast that change happens. Devices and machines are often rated by their power, such as in watts or horsepower. Recognising the correct term for the rate of doing work is essential in physics, engineering and everyday applications. Given Data / Assumptions: The quantity described is the rate at which work is done or energy is transferred. We want the specific physical term used for this rate. Options include capacity, energy, power and current. We assume classical mechanics definitions of work, energy and power. Concept / Approach: Power is defined as work done per unit time or energy transferred per unit time. Mathematically, P = W / t, where P is power, W is work and t is time. Energy is the ability to do work, not the rate at which it is done. Capacity is not a standard physics term for this concept. Electric current is the rate of flow of electric charge, not the rate of doing mechanical work. Therefore, the correct term for the rate of doing work is power. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that work W is done when a force causes displacement in the direction of the force. Step 2: Recognise that two processes may involve the same amount of work but take different times. Step 3: To compare how quickly work is done, physics defines power P as P = W / t. Step 4: Understand that energy is the stored capacity to do work, but energy by itself does not indicate how quickly it is used. Step 5: Capacity is not used as a precise physical term in this context, though in casual language it may refer to ability or storage. Step 6: Electric current is defined as I = Q / t, the rate of flow of charge, which is a different concept. Step 7: Thus, the correct term for rate of doing work is power. Verification / Alternative check: In everyday life, light bulbs, heaters and motors are rated in watts. One watt is defined as one joule of work done or energy transferred per second. For example, a 1000 W heater transfers 1000 J of energy every second. This clearly shows that power is a measure of how quickly energy is used or work is performed. Machines that can do the same work in less time are said to have higher power. This practical observation confirms that power is indeed the rate of doing work. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Capacity is a vague term and in physics is not the formal name of the rate of doing work. Energy represents the amount of work that can be done, measured in joules, not the rate at which it is done. Current is specifically the rate of flow of electric charge, not the rate of mechanical work or energy transfer in general. Common Pitfalls: Some learners loosely talk about energy when they mean power, such as saying a device uses a lot of energy when they actually refer to a high power rating. In exam questions, however, it is important to use precise terms. Remember that power is about speed of doing work (work per second), while energy is about total capacity or amount of work done. Keeping the formula P = W / t in mind will help you quickly select power as the correct answer. Final Answer: The rate of doing work or transferring energy per unit time is called Power.

Question 11

Comparing the following everyday liquids at room temperature, which one has the highest viscosity and therefore offers the greatest resistance to flow?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Viscosity is a measure of a fluid resistance to flow. Thick, sticky fluids have high viscosity, while thin, runny fluids have low viscosity. Everyday examples such as water, milk, juices and syrups help build intuition about this property. This question asks you to identify, among common liquids, which one has the highest viscosity at room temperature. Given Data / Assumptions: The liquids to be compared are milk, syrup, pineapple juice and water. All liquids are assumed to be at roughly the same room temperature. No special additives or extreme conditions are considered. We want the one with the greatest resistance to flow, that is, the highest viscosity. Concept / Approach: Viscosity describes internal friction in a fluid. In everyday terms, a liquid that pours slowly and feels thick or sticky has high viscosity. Water is a low viscosity fluid; it flows easily. Milk is slightly more viscous than water because it contains fat and proteins, but it still flows readily. Juices like pineapple juice may be a bit thicker than water but are normally still quite fluid. Syrups, such as sugar syrup or medicinal syrups, are much thicker and pour slowly due to their high sugar concentration and strong intermolecular interactions. Therefore, syrup clearly has the highest viscosity among the listed liquids. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Think about how each liquid behaves when poured from a bottle or spoon. Step 2: Water flows very quickly and spreads easily, indicating low viscosity. Step 3: Milk is a bit thicker but still flows almost as easily as water, so its viscosity is only slightly higher. Step 4: Pineapple juice may contain some pulp and sugars, which makes it a little thicker than pure water, but it remains relatively runny. Step 5: Syrup, such as sugar syrup, cough syrup or honey like liquids, pours slowly and forms thick streams or drops, a clear sign of high viscosity. Step 6: Among the choices, syrup is therefore the liquid with the greatest resistance to flow. Step 7: Conclude that syrup has the highest viscosity at room temperature among the given options. Verification / Alternative check: In a simple home experiment, if you pour equal volumes of water, milk, juice and syrup down an inclined plate, water will reach the bottom first, followed by milk and juice, while syrup will move the slowest. Industrial data on viscosity also show that sugar syrups can be several times more viscous than water or juice at the same temperature. These observations support the intuitive judgement that syrup has the highest viscosity among everyday liquids of this type. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Milk is only slightly more viscous than water and pours quite easily, so it is not the most viscous in the list. Pineapple juice, although it may contain pulp, is still usually runny and less viscous than syrup. Water is often used as a reference low viscosity liquid and clearly has much lower viscosity than syrup. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overthink simple qualitative questions and try to recall exact numerical values of viscosity, which is not necessary here. Relying on everyday experience is enough. Another mistake is to confuse density with viscosity; a fluid can be dense but still flow easily or be less dense and very sticky. In this question, the thick, sticky nature of syrup is the key indication that it has the highest viscosity among the options. Final Answer: Among the listed liquids, Syrup has the highest viscosity and the greatest resistance to flow.

Question 12

Considering only the gravitational field of the Earth itself and neglecting the influence of other celestial bodies, at which location is the gravitational field strength due to the Earth effectively zero?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This conceptual question deals with the gravitational field inside and around the Earth. In school physics, we often talk about the acceleration due to gravity g at the Earth surface, but g varies with distance from the centre of the Earth. Understanding where the gravitational field becomes zero helps build a correct mental picture of gravity inside a spherically symmetric body like the Earth. Given Data / Assumptions: The Earth is assumed to be a spherically symmetric body of uniform or smoothly varying density. Only the gravitational field due to the Earth is considered; other bodies like the Moon and Sun are neglected. We are asked where the gravitational field strength due to Earth becomes zero. Options describe the centre, the surface, a finite height and infinite distance. Concept / Approach: According to the shell theorem in Newtonian gravitation, for a spherically symmetric mass distribution, the gravitational field inside a spherical shell of matter is zero. For a full sphere like the Earth, the gravitational field at a point inside the Earth depends only on the mass enclosed within a sphere of radius r, where r is the distance from the centre. As you move towards the centre, the effective mass that contributes to gravity decreases with r^3, while the distance r also decreases. The result is that the gravitational field inside a uniform sphere is proportional to r and goes to zero at r equal to zero, that is, at the centre. At the surface, g has its usual value of about 9.8 m/s^2. At greater distances, g decreases but only approaches zero as distance tends to infinity, never becoming exactly zero at a finite radius. Therefore, the gravitational field is exactly zero only at the centre of the Earth under these ideal conditions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the shell theorem which states that a uniform spherical shell of matter exerts no net gravitational force on a particle located inside it. Step 2: For a point inside the Earth, think of the mass of the Earth as made up of a sphere of radius r and outer shells. Step 3: The outer shells contribute zero net gravitational field at that interior point due to the shell theorem. Step 4: Only the mass enclosed within radius r contributes to the gravitational field at that point. Step 5: For a uniform density Earth, enclosed mass is proportional to r^3, and gravitational field inside is proportional to r, which becomes zero when r equals zero. Step 6: At the very centre of the Earth, contributions from all directions cancel perfectly, resulting in zero net gravitational field. Step 7: Thus, the gravitational field strength due to the Earth is exactly zero only at its centre. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook graphs of gravitational field strength versus distance from the centre of the Earth show that g increases from zero at the centre to a maximum near the surface and then decreases with distance outside the Earth. While g decreases towards zero as distance tends to infinity, it never reaches exactly zero at any finite distance. Inside the Earth, however, the linear relationship between g and r leads to g equal to zero at the centre. This behaviour is a standard result in Newtonian gravitation and confirms that the centre is the only location of zero gravitational field due to the Earth alone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: At the Earth surface, the gravitational field is close to 9.8 m/s^2, not zero, and it is what we normally experience as weight. At a height equal to one Earth radius above the surface (twice the Earth radius from the centre), the gravitational field is reduced to one quarter of its surface value but is still not zero. At an infinite distance from the Earth, the gravitational field approaches zero but does not reach exactly zero at any finite distance; the question refers to an exact zero value. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that gravity becomes zero at very high altitudes or at some specific distance like one Earth radius above the surface. Another confusion arises from mixing the ideas of near zero and exactly zero. In pure Newtonian theory, the only point where the Earth gravitational field is exactly zero is at the centre of the Earth. Remembering the shell theorem and the idea that contributions from all directions cancel at the centre helps avoid this confusion. Final Answer: Under the stated assumptions, the gravitational field due to the Earth is zero at the centre of the Earth.

Question 13

At the core of the Sun, nuclear fusion reactions primarily convert hydrogen nuclei into which new element, releasing enormous amounts of energy?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Sun and other main sequence stars produce energy through nuclear fusion in their cores. In these extreme conditions of temperature and pressure, lighter nuclei combine to form heavier nuclei, releasing vast amounts of energy according to the mass energy relation. This question tests basic knowledge of stellar fusion, specifically which element is produced when hydrogen nuclei fuse in the core of the Sun. Given Data / Assumptions: The location is the centre or core of the Sun. The fuel is hydrogen nuclei (protons). We are asked which element is mainly formed in this fusion process. Options are helium, plutonium, water and carbon. Concept / Approach: In the Sun, the dominant fusion process at present is the proton proton chain. In this chain, four hydrogen nuclei (protons) ultimately combine through several intermediate reactions to form a helium 4 nucleus, along with positrons, neutrinos and energy in the form of gamma rays. Although heavier elements such as carbon and oxygen exist in stars and play a role in other fusion cycles, the primary reaction converting hydrogen in the Sun is to helium. Plutonium and water are not formed as primary fusion products in the core of the Sun. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Sun is mainly composed of hydrogen and helium, with hydrogen being the dominant element by number of atoms. Step 2: In the core, high temperature and pressure allow hydrogen nuclei (protons) to overcome electrostatic repulsion and fuse. Step 3: The proton proton chain involves several steps, but the net result is that four protons fuse to form one helium 4 nucleus. Step 4: During this process, some mass is converted to energy according to the relation E = m * c^2, which powers sunlight. Step 5: Helium is therefore the main product of hydrogen fusion in the Sun core. Step 6: Plutonium is a heavy, man made element produced in nuclear reactors and does not form as a primary fusion product in the Sun. Step 7: Water and carbon are compounds or elements not directly created as the main product in the proton proton chain fusion of hydrogen. Verification / Alternative check: Astrophysics texts describe main sequence stars like the Sun as hydrogen burning stars, where burning refers to nuclear fusion. The phrase hydrogen burning to helium in the core is standard. Observations of solar neutrinos and theoretical models of stellar structure all support the picture that hydrogen is being fused to helium in the core. Heavier elements like carbon, nitrogen and oxygen participate in the CNO cycle in more massive or hotter stars, but even there, helium is the primary product of hydrogen fusion. These consistent descriptions confirm that helium is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Plutonium is a very heavy element and is not produced in large quantities in main sequence stellar cores; it is mainly produced in nuclear reactors on Earth. Water is a chemical compound (H2O) and is not formed directly by nuclear fusion; it forms through chemical reactions at much lower energies. Carbon is involved as a catalyst in the CNO cycle in some stars, but in the Sun the primary product of hydrogen fusion is helium, not carbon itself. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse chemical changes with nuclear changes. Fusion in the Sun is a nuclear process that changes one element into another, not a chemical reaction forming molecules like water. Another confusion is to think that many heavy elements form directly in the Sun core. While heavier elements can form in advanced stages of massive stars, the main sequence Sun is primarily fusing hydrogen into helium. Remembering the phrase hydrogen to helium fusion for the Sun will help you answer correctly. Final Answer: At the centre of the Sun, nuclear fusion primarily converts hydrogen into Helium.

Question 14

In geology and plate tectonics, the pattern of symmetrical magnetic striping found on the ocean floor on either side of mid ocean ridges is considered strong evidence of which geological process?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Magnetic striping on the ocean floor is a key piece of evidence that supports the theory of plate tectonics and sea floor spreading. As magma rises at mid ocean ridges and solidifies to form new oceanic crust, it records the direction of the Earth magnetic field. Over time, the magnetic field has reversed many times, and these reversals leave a characteristic striped pattern of normal and reversed polarity in the oceanic rocks. This question tests your understanding of what geological process this magnetic striping pattern demonstrates. Given Data / Assumptions: We are dealing with magnetic striping observed on the ocean floor. The stripes of magnetic polarity are roughly symmetrical on both sides of mid ocean ridges. The options refer to different geological processes: sea floor spreading, wind erosion, glaciation and meteorite impacts. We assume basic knowledge of plate tectonics and oceanic crust formation. Concept / Approach: Sea floor spreading is the process where new oceanic crust is formed at mid ocean ridges and gradually moves away from the ridge as more magma rises and solidifies. As molten rock cools and crystallises, iron bearing minerals align with the Earth magnetic field at that time. Because the Earth magnetic field has undergone numerous reversals between normal and reversed polarity, these rocks preserve a chronological record of magnetic directions. The resulting pattern of alternating magnetic stripes parallel to the ridge, mirrored on both sides, provides clear evidence that new crust is continuously added at the ridge and pushed outward, supporting plate tectonics. Wind erosion, glaciation and meteorite impacts do not naturally produce such symmetric, ridge centred magnetic patterns. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand that mid ocean ridges are divergent plate boundaries where tectonic plates move apart. Step 2: Recognise that magma rises from the mantle at these ridges and forms new basaltic oceanic crust as it cools. Step 3: During cooling, magnetic minerals in the basalt align with the current direction of the Earth magnetic field. Step 4: Over millions of years, the Earth magnetic field reverses polarity many times, from normal to reversed and back. Step 5: As new crust continues to form and move away from the ridge, a pattern of alternating magnetic stripes is created, recording these reversals. Step 6: The stripes are symmetrical on both sides of the ridge, showing that crust has moved away equally on both sides, consistent with sea floor spreading. Step 7: Therefore, magnetic striping is strong evidence for sea floor spreading and the broader theory of plate tectonics. Verification / Alternative check: Geophysical surveys of the ocean floor, especially those conducted in the mid twentieth century, revealed these magnetic patterns. When scientists correlated stripe ages with known times of magnetic reversals, they found that the stripes recorded a time sequence of crust formation that matched reversal chronology. This correlation and symmetry around ridges provided compelling support for the idea that new ocean crust is created at ridges and moves outward, confirming sea floor spreading. Alternative explanations such as erosion or impacts cannot explain the systematic symmetrical magnetic pattern tied to reversal timing. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Wind erosion of coastlines may shape landforms but does not create symmetric bands of magnetic polarity on the deep ocean floor. Continental glaciation leaves features such as striations, moraines and drumlins, not magnetic stripes centred on mid ocean ridges. Meteorite impact events can produce local shock features and craters but do not lead to systematic, ridge parallel magnetic striping over large areas. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse magnetic striping with other banded geological structures such as sedimentary layering. Magnetic striping is a geophysical pattern related to magnetisation, not visible bands in rock colour. Another confusion is to think that any large scale pattern on the ocean floor could be due to erosion or deposition, but here the symmetry and match with magnetic reversal timing are key clues pointing specifically to sea floor spreading. Remember that magnetic stripes are one of the classic evidences that led to widespread acceptance of plate tectonics. Final Answer: Magnetic striping on the ocean floor is strong evidence of sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.

Question 15

Which meteorological instrument is specifically used to measure the speed of wind in the atmosphere?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Weather stations and meteorological departments use different instruments to measure various atmospheric quantities such as temperature, pressure, humidity and wind speed. Knowing which instrument corresponds to which quantity is a common requirement in general knowledge and basic science exams. This question asks you to identify the instrument used specifically for measuring wind speed. Given Data / Assumptions: The quantity of interest is wind speed in the atmosphere. Options include anemometer, inclinometer, fathometer and calorimeter. We assume standard instrument definitions in meteorology and physics. Concept / Approach: An anemometer is a meteorological instrument designed to measure wind speed, and sometimes wind direction together with other devices. Traditional cup anemometers use rotating cups that spin faster as wind speed increases. Modern anemometers may use ultrasonic sensors. Inclinometers measure angles of slope or tilt, fathometers measure water depth using sound waves, and calorimeters measure heat changes in thermal experiments. Therefore, anemometer is the correct instrument for wind speed measurement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that wind speed is a basic weather variable used in forecasting storms, aviation safety and marine navigation. Step 2: Anemometers are routinely seen in images of weather stations as instruments with rotating cups or propellers. Step 3: The rotation rate of the cups or propeller is calibrated to give wind speed in units such as m/s or km/h. Step 4: Inclinometers are used to measure slope or tilt angles in engineering and surveying, not wind speed. Step 5: Fathometers are echo sounding devices that send sound waves downward in water to measure depth beneath a ship. Step 6: Calorimeters are laboratory instruments used to measure amounts of heat in physical or chemical processes. Step 7: Thus, the only instrument designed for wind speed measurement among the options is the anemometer. Verification / Alternative check: Weather reports from meteorological departments often reference data from anemometers when describing wind speed at various locations. Aviation and marine weather stations also rely on anemometers to monitor conditions for safe operations. Textbooks and encyclopedias consistently define an anemometer as a wind speed measuring device, while inclinometer, fathometer and calorimeter have completely different uses. This confirms that anemometer is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Inclinometer measures inclination or tilt angles and is used in civil engineering and geology. Fathometer measures depth of water from a ship to the sea bottom using echo sounding. Calorimeter measures heat quantities in experiments and is not connected to wind speed. Common Pitfalls: Because all the options end with the suffix meter, indicating measurement, students may confuse their functions. A simple memory aid is to associate anemo with wind, fathom with depth, inclin with inclination and calor with heat. Keeping these associations clear prevents confusion and allows you to answer such instrument questions quickly and accurately. Final Answer: The instrument used to measure wind speed is the Anemometer.

Question 16

Among the following everyday materials, through which one does visible light not pass (that is, which material is effectively opaque to light)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In optics, materials are classified based on how they transmit light. Transparent materials allow most light to pass so that objects can be clearly seen through them, translucent materials allow partial light with blurring, and opaque materials do not allow light to pass through. This simple conceptual question asks you to identify, among familiar objects, which one is effectively opaque to visible light. Given Data / Assumptions: The materials listed are notebook paper, water, a book and sun glasses. We are concerned with visible light and normal everyday usage of these objects. We assume typical thicknesses, such as a closed book of many pages and regular notebook paper. Opaque means that light does not pass through sufficiently for you to see objects behind the material. Concept / Approach: Transparent materials, like clean water and many glasses, allow light to pass so that you can see clearly through them. Translucent materials, like thin notebook paper, allow some light to pass but scatter it so that objects behind appear blurred or not visible in detail. Opaque materials, like a closed book with many pages, block light almost completely, preventing you from seeing through them. Sun glasses are designed to reduce the intensity of light but still allow enough light to pass so that you can see. Therefore, among the options, a book is effectively opaque to light. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider water. Clean water in a glass is transparent; you can easily see objects through it, so light passes through. Step 2: Consider sun glasses. Although they are tinted and darken the view, you can still see through them, which shows they transmit light, making them partially transparent. Step 3: Consider notebook paper. A single sheet of notebook paper allows some light to pass if held against a bright source, but you cannot see clear images behind it, so it is more translucent than fully transparent. Step 4: Consider a closed book made up of many sheets of paper bound together. Step 5: The total thickness and multiple layers of paper in a book block almost all light; you cannot see through a closed book. Step 6: Therefore, among the given materials, the book is effectively opaque to visible light. Step 7: Conclude that light does not pass through a book in the sense of everyday observation. Verification / Alternative check: A simple experiment is to place each of the listed objects between your eye and a bright lamp. Through water, you can clearly see the lamp. Through sun glasses, you can still see the lamp but dimmer. Through a single sheet of notebook paper, you see only a glow without a clear image, indicating partial transmission. Through a closed book, the lamp is completely blocked, and no light appears on the far side. This practical test confirms that the book is the opaque object among the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Notebook paper, though it can block detailed images, allows some light to pass and is better described as translucent rather than completely opaque. Water is a transparent medium that allows light to pass through with minimal scattering, especially when pure and in a thin layer. Sun glasses are designed to transmit light while filtering and reducing its intensity; they are not opaque because you can see through them. Common Pitfalls: Students may think of notebook paper as blocking light because it hides text behind it, but careful observation shows that light can still shine through, especially from a bright source. The question asks through which light cannot pass, so you should choose the material that blocks light in a practical sense. Remember that transparency, translucency and opacity refer to the degree of light transmission, not just whether you can read print through the material. Final Answer: Among the given options, a Book is effectively opaque and does not allow visible light to pass through.

Question 17

Gasoline (petrol) is useful as a fuel in car engines primarily because it stores which type of energy that can be converted into useful work?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Fuels such as gasoline power car engines by storing energy that can be released and converted into mechanical work. Understanding the nature of this stored energy is a basic concept in physics and chemistry. This question asks you to identify which type of energy is stored in gasoline that makes it useful as a fuel. Given Data / Assumptions: The substance is gasoline, also called petrol, used in internal combustion engines. We consider the energy stored in the fuel before combustion. Options include chemical potential energy, electrical potential energy, gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. We assume normal use of gasoline in car engines where it is burned with air. Concept / Approach: Gasoline is a mixture of hydrocarbons. The energy it stores is in the form of chemical potential energy associated with the bonds between atoms in the molecules. When gasoline burns in the presence of oxygen in an internal combustion engine, chemical reactions occur that rearrange atoms into lower energy products such as carbon dioxide and water, releasing the difference in energy as heat. This heat increases pressure and temperature of gases, which then push pistons and perform mechanical work. The stored energy is therefore chemical in nature. Electrical potential energy is associated with electric charges in electric fields, gravitational potential energy is associated with height in a gravitational field, and kinetic energy is associated with motion. None of these describes the energy stored in gasoline before it is burned. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that gasoline is a chemical fuel composed of hydrocarbons such as octane. Step 2: This fuel does not have significant motion before use, so kinetic energy is not the main stored form. Step 3: In a fuel tank, gasoline is not at a special height to have significant gravitational potential energy relative to its surroundings. Step 4: No electric field is storing energy in it as electrical potential energy in the usual sense of electric circuits. Step 5: Instead, the energy is stored in the chemical bonds between atoms in the hydrocarbon molecules. Step 6: During combustion, these bonds are broken and new bonds are formed in products, releasing energy as heat and work. Step 7: Therefore, the correct term for the stored energy in gasoline is chemical potential energy. Verification / Alternative check: Chemistry and thermodynamics textbooks describe fuels in terms of their calorific value, which is the amount of heat released by complete combustion. This heat arises from changes in chemical bond energies. Energy diagrams for combustion reactions show that reactants like gasoline and oxygen have higher chemical potential energy compared to products like carbon dioxide and water. The difference is released as energy that can be converted into mechanical work in an engine. These descriptions confirm that the form of stored energy in gasoline is chemical potential energy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Electrical potential energy describes energy stored due to positions of charges in an electric field, which is not the primary form of energy in gasoline. Gravitational potential energy depends on height in a gravitational field; the energy content of gasoline does not mainly come from its position in gravity. Kinetic energy is the energy of motion and does not describe stored energy in stationary fuel before it is burned. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may think of energy in terms of motion or height because these are easy to visualise. However, for fuels, the relevant concept is chemical energy stored in bonds. It is also important not to confuse electrical energy used in electric vehicles with chemical energy used in conventional petrol engines. Remembering that combustion of fuels always involves conversion of chemical potential energy into heat and mechanical work will help you choose the correct answer quickly. Final Answer: Gasoline is useful in cars because it contains chemical potential energy that can be released and converted into mechanical work when it burns.

Question 18

During heat transfer by conduction in solids, energy is mainly transferred from one part of the material to another when molecules or atoms do what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Heat can be transferred by three main mechanisms: conduction, convection and radiation. In solids, especially metals, conduction is the dominant mode of heat transfer. At the microscopic level, conduction involves interactions among particles in the material. This question asks you to identify what molecules or atoms do during conduction that allows thermal energy to be passed along. Given Data / Assumptions: The heat transfer mode under consideration is conduction, primarily in solids. We are focusing on the microscopic behaviour of molecules or atoms. Options refer to collisions, chemical combination, simple heating and an open none of the above choice. We assume a basic kinetic theory model of matter. Concept / Approach: In conduction, heat is transferred within a body or between bodies in direct contact without any bulk movement of matter. In solids, atoms and molecules vibrate about their mean positions. When one end of a solid is heated, particles there vibrate more vigorously and collide with neighbouring particles, passing on some of their energy. This chain of collisions and interactions transfers energy from the hot end to the cold end. In metals, free electrons also carry energy, but collisions and interactions remain central. Thus, conduction occurs because molecules or atoms collide and interact, sharing energy. Chemical combination is not necessary, and simply being heated without interaction does not transfer energy from one region to another. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that conduction does not involve large scale movement of matter; the material stays in place. Step 2: At the hot end of a solid bar, particles gain kinetic energy and vibrate more strongly. Step 3: These energetic particles interact with neighbouring particles through collisions and intermolecular forces. Step 4: During these collisions, some of the kinetic energy is transferred from hotter particles to cooler ones. Step 5: This process repeats, sending energy step by step along the material from the hot region to the cold region. Step 6: There is no need for particles to combine chemically to transfer heat; conduction is a physical process. Step 7: Therefore, the key microscopic action in conduction is that molecules collide with neighbouring molecules and share energy. Verification / Alternative check: According to kinetic theory, temperature is related to average kinetic energy of particles. When a metal rod is heated at one end, experiments show that the other end gradually warms up even though metal does not flow. This can be explained by vibration and collisions of atoms and electrons transferring energy. In insulators, where electrons are less free, lattice vibrations and collisions of atoms dominate conduction. No chemical reaction takes place, and simply heating identical isolated particles would not spread energy along a solid. These observations confirm that collisions and interactions among neighbouring particles are central to conduction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Combine to form new substances describes chemical reactions, not the physical process of heat conduction in a solid. Are simply heated without interaction cannot transfer energy from one region to another; interaction through collisions is necessary. None of the above is incorrect because collisions with neighbouring molecules are exactly how conduction occurs at the microscopic level. Common Pitfalls: Some learners mix up conduction with convection and think that particle movement is required in both cases. In conduction, particles vibrate and collide but do not undergo large scale bulk motion. Another confusion is between conduction and chemical change. Heat conduction in solids is a physical process and does not require new substances to form. Remember that in conduction, energy flows through collisions and interactions between neighbouring particles, which is why this option is correct. Final Answer: Heat transfer by conduction occurs when molecules collide with neighbouring molecules and transfer energy through these interactions.

Question 19

According to basic thermodynamics, heat energy flows spontaneously from one body to another as a result of a difference in which physical quantity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding why and how heat flows is a central part of thermodynamics. Everyday experience shows that a hot object placed in contact with a cold object cools down while the colder object warms up. This behaviour can be explained using the concept of temperature and thermal equilibrium. This question asks you to identify the physical quantity difference that drives spontaneous heat flow. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider two bodies or regions that may exchange heat. Heat transfer is spontaneous, meaning no external work is done to force it. Options include temperature, density, mass and volume differences. We assume classical thermodynamics with well defined temperatures. Concept / Approach: The zeroth law and second law of thermodynamics state that heat flows spontaneously from a body at higher temperature to a body at lower temperature until thermal equilibrium is reached. Temperature is the measure of the average kinetic energy of the microscopic particles in a system. Density, mass and volume may influence how much heat is transferred or the rate of transfer, but they do not in themselves determine the direction of spontaneous heat flow. It is the temperature difference that drives the process of heat transfer by conduction, convection or radiation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider two bodies in contact, one hotter and one colder. Step 2: Observationally, the hot body cools while the cold body warms until both reach the same temperature. Step 3: This process is described as heat flowing from the region of higher temperature to the region of lower temperature. Step 4: Even if the masses or volumes of the bodies differ, the direction of spontaneous heat flow depends on which one has higher temperature, not on mass or volume alone. Step 5: Density differences can be important for convection patterns but do not directly set the direction of heat flow; temperature difference does. Step 6: When temperatures become equal, heat flow stops and the system reaches thermal equilibrium. Step 7: Therefore, heat flows as a result of a difference of temperature. Verification / Alternative check: Thermodynamic statements such as heat cannot of itself flow from a colder body to a hotter body summarise the second law of thermodynamics. This clearly indicates that the sign of the temperature difference determines the direction of spontaneous heat flow. Mathematical descriptions of conduction, such as Fourier law q proportional to minus k * dT/dx, also show that heat flux is proportional to temperature gradient. Density, mass and volume appear in heat capacity and rate calculations but not as the primary driving difference. All these formulations confirm that temperature difference is the key factor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Density differences influence buoyancy driven convection but do not directly determine the direction of heat flow without an associated temperature difference. Mass determines how much heat a body can store for a given temperature change but does not cause heat to flow on its own. Volume is related to size but, like mass, does not by itself drive heat flow; there must be a temperature difference. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that larger or denser objects always lose heat to smaller ones, but this is not true. A small very hot object can transfer heat to a large slightly cooler object because the direction of flow is defined by temperature difference, not by size. It is also easy to confuse temperature with heat; temperature is a measure of thermal state, while heat is energy in transit. Remember that spontaneous heat transfer always occurs down the temperature gradient from higher to lower temperature. Final Answer: Heat flows spontaneously because of a difference of Temperature between bodies or regions.

Question 20

If a person moves a trolley horizontally for a distance of 10 m by applying a constant force of 50 N, what is the mechanical work done on the trolley in joule?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This numerical physics question tests your understanding of the basic definition of mechanical work in translational motion. Work done by a constant force is one of the first applications of the concepts of force and displacement in mechanics. Examinations frequently ask such direct formula based questions to ensure that students remember the relation between force, displacement, and work along the direction of motion. Given Data / Assumptions: - Magnitude of the applied force, F = 50 N.- Displacement of the trolley in the direction of the force, s = 10 m.- The force acts in the same direction as the displacement.- We neglect friction and any other opposing forces for this simple calculation.- We want the work done in joule, the SI unit of work and energy. Concept / Approach: For motion in a straight line when a constant force acts in the same direction as the displacement, mechanical work W is defined by the relation W = F * s. Here F is the magnitude of the force and s is the displacement in the direction of that force. If the force is not along the displacement, we use W = F * s * cos(theta), but in this question the angle between force and displacement is zero, so cos(theta) = 1 and the simple product F * s is sufficient. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Identify the correct formula for work done by a constant force: W = F * s.2. Substitute the given force F = 50 N into the expression.3. Substitute the given displacement s = 10 m along the direction of the force.4. Multiply the two values: W = 50 * 10.5. Calculate the product: 50 * 10 = 500.6. Attach the correct unit: since 1 N * 1 m = 1 J, the work done is 500 J. Verification / Alternative check: A quick sense check can be done by comparing with smaller values. If the same force of 50 N moved the trolley only 1 m, the work would be 50 J. Moving it ten times farther with the same force should naturally lead to ten times more work, which is 500 J. This proportional reasoning matches the calculated result and confirms that the obtained value is reasonable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 0.2 J: This is far too small and could result from inverting the numbers or mishandling decimal places.- 5 J: This would correspond to a much smaller displacement, for example 0.1 m, and does not match 10 m of motion.- 20 J: This might come from mistakenly multiplying 2 * 10 instead of 50 * 10 or confusing force with mass. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes forget that displacement must be in metre and force in newton for the answer to be directly in joule. Another common error is to divide instead of multiply, especially when other formulae in mechanics involve ratios. It is also important to note the direction: only the component of the force along the displacement contributes to work. In this question the wording clearly states that the trolley is moved by the force along the same direction, so no angle correction is needed. Final Answer: The work done on the trolley is 500 J.

Physics Questions