Question 1

Who among the following sportspersons was honoured with the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award for the year 2016?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, now known simply as the Khel Ratna Award, is the highest sporting honour of India. Questions about its recipients by year are common in competitive examinations. This item focuses on the year 2016 and asks you to identify which sportsperson from the options was honoured with this top level sports award. Given Data / Assumptions: The year of the award is 2016. The award is the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, the premier sports award in India at that time. The options list well known sportspersons from different disciplines. More than one player received the award in 2016, but only one of the names listed here is among them. Concept / Approach:In 2016, the Khel Ratna was conferred on multiple athletes who excelled in their fields, including shooting, gymnastics, badminton, and wrestling. Among the given options, you must recall which name appears in that official list. Sania Mirza had already received the Khel Ratna earlier, and Rohit Sharma and Babita Kumari were not listed as 2016 Khel Ratna awardees, which helps you narrow down the answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the 2016 Khel Ratna awardees included P V Sindhu, Dipa Karmakar, Sakshi Malik, and shooter Jitu Rai. Step 2: Compare the given options with this list of known 2016 awardees. Step 3: Among Jitu Rai, Sania Mirza, Rohit Sharma, and Babita Kumari, only Jitu Rai matches the group of 2016 Khel Ratna recipients. Step 4: Therefore, Jitu Rai is the correct answer for this question. Verification / Alternative check:Official notifications from the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, as well as standard sports current affairs summaries, clearly list Jitu Rai as one of the Khel Ratna awardees for 2016. Sania Mirza received the award earlier in 2015, and there is no record of Rohit Sharma or Babita Kumari being Khel Ratna recipients in that particular year. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sania Mirza is a celebrated tennis player who did receive the Khel Ratna, but she was honoured in 2015, not in 2016. Rohit Sharma is a star cricketer, however he was not part of the Khel Ratna awardees list for 2016. Babita Kumari is a wrestler who has earned multiple honours, but she was not named among the Khel Ratna recipients in 2016. Common Pitfalls:A common mistake is to pick the most famous name rather than match the exact year remembered from sports news. Candidates sometimes mix up years when multiple high profile athletes are honoured close together. Building a simple mental timeline of sports awards, especially Olympic year recognitions, helps reduce confusion and improves accuracy in these static current affairs questions. Final Answer:The sportsperson who received the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award for the year 2016 is Jitu Rai.

Question 2

Which actress received the Best Actress award at the 64th National Film Awards announced in 2017 for her performance in a feature film?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:National Film Awards are among the most credible film honours in India because they are presented by the Government of India and decided by an independent jury. The 64th National Film Awards, announced in 2017 for films released in 2016, are important from an examination perspective. This question asks you to recall which actress received the Best Actress award at that edition. Given Data / Assumptions: The award is the Best Actress award at the National Film Awards. The edition is the 64th National Film Awards. The announcement year is 2017. Options include four popular actresses from Indian cinema. Concept / Approach:To answer, you need to connect the 64th National Film Awards with the Malayalam film Minnaminungu and the relatively less mainstream actress who won for an intense character driven role. Many aspirants tend to assume that only nationally famous actresses from big budget films win such awards, but the National Film Awards often recognise subtle performances in regional cinema. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Best Actress award at the 64th National Film Awards went to Surabhi Lakshmi for her performance in the Malayalam film Minnaminungu. Step 2: In the options, Surabhi CM refers to the same actress Surabhi Lakshmi, who is sometimes written with initials in exam material. Step 3: Taapsee Pannu, Trisha Krishnan, and Anushka Shetty are well known actresses, but none of them were announced as the Best Actress winner at the 64th National Film Awards. Step 4: Therefore, Surabhi CM is the correct option. Verification / Alternative check:Lists of winners of the 64th National Film Awards clearly mention Surabhi Lakshmi as the Best Actress awardee for her role in Minnaminungu. These official and media sources confirm that the award did not go to Taapsee Pannu, Trisha Krishnan, or Anushka Shetty in that edition, even though they may have delivered notable performances in other films around that time. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tapasee Pannu, more commonly spelled Taapsee Pannu, has received several honours and popular appreciation but did not win the Best Actress award at the 64th National Film Awards. Trisha Krishnan is a prominent actress in South Indian cinema, yet her name does not appear as the Best Actress winner in the 64th National Film Awards list. Anushka Shetty is also a leading actress best known for big budget films, but she did not receive the Best Actress National Award for that year. Common Pitfalls:Candidates often assume that a National Award must have gone to a nationally famous star from Hindi cinema or a widely publicised blockbuster film. This leads them to ignore comparatively lesser known names like Surabhi Lakshmi, who actually won. To avoid this error, it is important to study National Film Award lists carefully and note how frequently regional cinema performances are recognised at the highest level. Final Answer:The Best Actress award at the 64th National Film Awards announced in 2017 was given to Surabhi CM (Surabhi Lakshmi).

Question 3

In the list of sportspersons given below, who did not receive the 2016 Arjuna Award specifically in the field of wrestling?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This general knowledge question checks your awareness of the Arjuna Awards for the year 2016 and, in particular, which sportspersons were honoured for wrestling. Sports awards are a frequent topic in competitive examinations, so knowing which athlete belongs to which discipline and who received which award in a given year is very important. Here you have to pick the one name who did not receive the 2016 Arjuna Award in the field of wrestling.Given Data / Assumptions:The year under consideration is 2016.The award concerned is the Arjuna Award.The field mentioned in the question is wrestling.The listed sportspersons are Virender Singh, Vinesh Phogat, Amit Kumar, and Rajat Chauhan.Only one of these names did not receive the Arjuna Award in the field of wrestling in 2016.Concept / Approach:The key is to recall or recognise the official list of Arjuna Awardees for 2016 and to link each sportsperson with the correct sport and category. Three of the listed individuals are well known Indian wrestlers associated with the Arjuna Awards for that year. Rajat Chauhan, however, is associated with archery, not wrestling. The conceptual approach therefore combines knowledge of sports disciplines with knowledge of the Arjuna Award list.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Remember that the Arjuna Award is given for consistent outstanding performance in sports over a period of four years.Step 2: Recall the names of wrestlers who received the Arjuna Award in 2016. These include Virender Singh in para sports for wrestling, Vinesh Phogat in wrestling, and Amit Kumar in wrestling.Step 3: Match the options with their sports. Virender Singh, Vinesh Phogat, and Amit Kumar are all wrestlers who were honoured with the Arjuna Award in 2016.Step 4: Note that Rajat Chauhan is a prominent compound archer and received the Arjuna Award for archery, not for wrestling.Step 5: Since the question asks who did not receive the 2016 Arjuna Award in the field of wrestling, Rajat Chauhan is the only option that fits this condition.Verification / Alternative check:You can verify the answer by checking the official list of National Sports Awards for 2016 released by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports. In that list, Virender Singh, Vinesh Phogat, and Amit Kumar are clearly mentioned as Arjuna Awardees for wrestling, whereas Rajat Chauhan is listed under archery. Cross checking more than one reliable sports GK compilation or yearbook will confirm the same information and remove any remaining doubt.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Virender Singh: A decorated para wrestler who received the Arjuna Award in 2016 for his achievements in wrestling, so he does not answer the question.Vinesh Phogat: A well known Indian woman wrestler who was an Arjuna Award recipient in 2016 in wrestling, so she is not the required exception.Amit Kumar: Another successful Indian wrestler who also received the Arjuna Award in 2016 in the wrestling category, so he is not the correct option.None of these: This would mean that all the given names did receive the Arjuna Award in wrestling in 2016, which is not accurate because Rajat Chauhan is associated with archery.Common Pitfalls:Candidates often make mistakes by assuming that every Arjuna Awardee is linked with a single generic category of sport and do not pay attention to the exact discipline mentioned in the citation. Another common confusion is between different years of the award or between other honours such as the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna and the Arjuna Award. It is also easy to misclassify Rajat Chauhan as a wrestler because the other three names are wrestlers, but careful students will remember that he is actually a compound archer.Final Answer:Rajat Chauhan did not receive the 2016 Arjuna Award in the field of wrestling, because his Arjuna Award was in the discipline of archery, so he is the correct choice.

Question 4

Which of the following sportspersons was not a recipient of the Major Dhyan Chand Lifetime Achievement Award in 2016?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests your knowledge of Indian sports honours, specifically the Major Dhyan Chand Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sports and Games for the year 2016. The award recognises long term outstanding contributions by sportspersons. You are asked to identify which one among the given names was not honoured with this lifetime achievement award in that year.Given Data / Assumptions:The award in focus is the Major Dhyan Chand Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sports and Games.The relevant year is 2016.The options include Rajendra Pralhad Shelke, Sylvanus Dung Dung, Sathi Geetha, and Amit Kumar.Exactly three of these names were recipients of the award in 2016, and one name was not.Concept / Approach:The correct approach is to recall the official list of Major Dhyan Chand Awardees for 2016 and link each name to the sports discipline and award information. Rajendra Pralhad Shelke is associated with rowing, Sylvanus Dung Dung with hockey, and Sathi Geetha with athletics, and all three received the Major Dhyan Chand Award in 2016. Amit Kumar, however, is not listed among the awardees for that year, so he is the odd one out.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that the Major Dhyan Chand Award is India s lifetime achievement award in sports, named after hockey legend Dhyan Chand.Step 2: Review the 2016 list of recipients. It includes Rajendra Pralhad Shelke for rowing, Sylvanus Dung Dung for hockey, and Sathi Geetha for athletics.Step 3: Match each of the options with this list. Options A, B, and C clearly appear in the official 2016 recipients.Step 4: Note that Amit Kumar does not appear anywhere in the Major Dhyan Chand Award list for 2016.Step 5: Therefore, Amit Kumar is the only given sportsperson who was not a recipient of the Major Dhyan Chand Lifetime Achievement Award in that year.Verification / Alternative check:You can confirm this answer by checking the National Sports Awards document for 2016. Under the heading for the Major Dhyan Chand Award, the names of Rajendra Pralhad Shelke, Sylvanus Dung Dung, and Sathi Geetha are clearly listed, but Amit Kumar is not present. Reputable exam preparation books and online GK portals that compile sports awards by year also show the same set of three names, which confirms that Amit Kumar was not a recipient.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Rajendra Pralhad Shelke: An accomplished rower who did receive the Major Dhyan Chand Award in 2016, so he cannot be the correct answer.Sylvanus Dung Dung: A former Indian hockey player and Olympic gold medallist who was honoured with the Major Dhyan Chand Award in 2016, so this option is incorrect.Sathi Geetha: A sprinter from athletics who also received the Major Dhyan Chand Award in 2016, making this option incorrect.None of these: This would imply that all of the named sportspersons received the award, which is false because Amit Kumar did not.Common Pitfalls:Students sometimes confuse the Major Dhyan Chand Award with the Arjuna Award or the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, especially when the same names appear in different honours over the years. Another frequent mistake is to forget the year and assume that a well known sportsperson must have received a specific award at any time. For such questions, always pay attention to the year mentioned and the exact title of the award.Final Answer:Amit Kumar was not a recipient of the Major Dhyan Chand Lifetime Achievement Award in 2016, so he is the correct choice.

Question 5

In the the Padma Awards list for 2017, which hockey player received the Padma Shri in the field of Sports Hockey?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question focuses on civilian honours, specifically the Padma Awards for the year 2017, and links them to Indian hockey. The Padma Shri is a high civilian award given for distinguished service in any field. Here, you are asked to identify which hockey player received the Padma Shri in the category Sports Hockey in 2017.Given Data / Assumptions:The year is 2017.The award in focus is the Padma Shri.The field is Sports Hockey.The options are Sardar Singh, P. R. Sreejesh, Ramandeep Singh, Yuvraj Walmiki, and Rani Rampal.Exactly one of these players was awarded the Padma Shri in 2017 for hockey.Concept / Approach:The correct approach is to recall the official Padma awards list for 2017. Many sportspersons from different disciplines were honoured that year, but only one male hockey player received the Padma Shri for his contribution to Indian hockey. While several of the names listed are associated with Indian hockey, only P. R. Sreejesh is recorded as a Padma Shri awardee in 2017 in the category Sports Hockey.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that Padma Awards are announced every year on the eve of Republic Day and include Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri.Step 2: Look at the list of 2017 Padma awardees, especially under Sports.Step 3: Identify the hockey players who are known to have received Padma honours. P. R. Sreejesh, the Indian hockey goalkeeper and captain, is noted as a Padma Shri awardee in 2017.Step 4: Verify that Sardar Singh, Ramandeep Singh, Yuvraj Walmiki, and Rani Rampal were not Padma Shri awardees in 2017, even though they are noted Indian hockey players.Step 5: Conclude that the only correct option for the Padma Shri 2017 in Sports Hockey is P. R. Sreejesh.Verification / Alternative check:The official Padma awards website and government notifications list all recipients by year and category. For 2017, under the sports category, you can clearly see P. R. Sreejesh mentioned with the notation Sport Hockey against his name as a Padma Shri recipient. Sports news articles and profiles of P. R. Sreejesh also highlight that he was honoured with the Padma Shri in 2017. Cross checking with a reliable civil honours GK table in a standard competitive exam book will give the same information.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Sardar Singh: A famous Indian hockey midfielder and former captain who has received other honours, but he was not listed as a Padma Shri awardee in 2017.Ramandeep Singh: A forward for the national team, but there is no record of him receiving the Padma Shri in 2017.Yuvraj Walmiki: An Indian forward known for his performance in international tournaments, yet he does not appear in the 2017 Padma Shri list.Rani Rampal: A celebrated captain of the Indian women hockey team, honoured later with major awards, but not with the Padma Shri in 2017.Common Pitfalls:Candidates often confuse the years in which prominent hockey players received awards, or mix up the Padma Shri with other honours such as the Arjuna Award or the Khel Ratna. Another common issue is to assume that the most famous name must be the awardee, rather than checking the specific year and category. Being precise with both year and award title is essential for such questions.Final Answer:P. R. Sreejesh received the Padma Shri in 2017 in the category Sports Hockey, so option B is correct.

Question 6

Who received the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award at the 62nd Jio Filmfare Awards ceremony held in 2017?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question belongs to the topic of Indian cinema awards and focuses on the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award. Specifically, it asks about the recipient of this honour at the 62nd Jio Filmfare Awards held in 2017. Lifetime achievement awards usually go to senior artists who have made a long and significant contribution to the film industry.Given Data / Assumptions:The award in question is the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award.The ceremony year is 2017, corresponding to the 62nd Jio Filmfare Awards.The options include Yash Chopra, Kamini Kaushal, Shatrughan Sinha, Moushumi Chatterjee, and Rekha.Only one of these names is associated with the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award for that particular year.Concept / Approach:The strategy is to link the award year and edition number with the known recipient. The 62nd Filmfare Awards in 2017 honoured veteran actor and politician Shatrughan Sinha with the Lifetime Achievement Award. Other names listed in the options are legendary figures who have also received various honours, but not this specific one in 2017.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that Filmfare Awards are annual Bollywood film awards, and the Lifetime Achievement Award recognises a career of outstanding work in cinema.Step 2: Focus on the 62nd Jio Filmfare Awards that took place in 2017.Step 3: Remember news headlines and coverage from that year which highlighted Shatrughan Sinha being honoured with the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award.Step 4: Check that the other options are not associated with the 2017 Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award.Step 5: Conclude that Shatrughan Sinha is the correct recipient for the year and edition mentioned.Verification / Alternative check:The answer can be verified by checking entertainment news archives or the official Filmfare website for the list of winners of the 62nd Filmfare Awards. The coverage clearly notes that Shatrughan Sinha received the Lifetime Achievement Award for his nearly five decades of contribution to Hindi cinema. Biographical articles and award summaries for Shatrughan Sinha also mention this honour with the specific year 2017 and the 62nd Filmfare Awards.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Yash Chopra: An acclaimed director and producer who has been honoured posthumously and through other tributes, but he did not receive the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award in 2017.Kamini Kaushal: A veteran actress who has been celebrated for her work, yet she was not the recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award at the 62nd Filmfare Awards.Moushumi Chatterjee: A celebrated actress of Hindi and Bengali cinema, but not the Lifetime Achievement Awardee for the 2017 ceremony.Rekha: A legendary actress who has been honoured many times, but not with the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award in 2017.Common Pitfalls:Students may confuse different years of Filmfare ceremonies or mix up Filmfare honours with other awards like the National Film Awards, IIFA or Screen Awards. Another common trap is assuming that any senior and iconic actor from the options must be the correct answer without focusing on the specific year and award edition mentioned in the question.Final Answer:Shatrughan Sinha received the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award at the 62nd Jio Filmfare Awards in 2017, so option C is correct.

Question 7

Which of the following is recognised as the highest civilian award of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is a fundamental static general knowledge question about Indian awards and honours. It asks you to identify the highest civilian award of India from among the listed options. Knowledge of this basic hierarchy is crucial for almost every competitive exam, as questions on national awards appear frequently.Given Data / Assumptions:The focus is on civilian awards of India.The options are Padma Bhushan, Param Vir Chakra, Padma Vibhushan, Bharat Ratna, and Padma Shri.You must recognise which award stands at the top of the civilian honours hierarchy.Concept / Approach:The hierarchy of major Indian civilian awards places Bharat Ratna at the top, followed by Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri. Param Vir Chakra is not a civilian award; it is the highest military decoration for gallantry in the presence of the enemy. Therefore, the correct answer must be Bharat Ratna, which is clearly stated in official documents as the highest civilian honour of India.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall the main civilian awards of India: Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri.Step 2: Remember the order of precedence: Bharat Ratna is the highest civilian award, followed in descending order by Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri.Step 3: Note that Param Vir Chakra, although very prestigious, is a military gallantry award, not a civilian award.Step 4: Compare each option with this hierarchy. Only Bharat Ratna fits the description of the highest civilian award of India.Step 5: Select Bharat Ratna as the correct answer.Verification / Alternative check:You can verify this information from official government sources and reliable reference sites on Indian orders, decorations, and medals. They consistently describe Bharat Ratna as the highest civilian award of India, conferred for exceptional service or performance of the highest order in any field of human endeavour. The descriptions of Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri explicitly place them below Bharat Ratna, which confirms the hierarchy.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Padma Bhushan: A high civilian award given for distinguished service of a high order, but it ranks below Padma Vibhushan and far below Bharat Ratna.Param Vir Chakra: The highest wartime gallantry award for military personnel, not a civilian award, so it does not answer the question.Padma Vibhushan: The second highest civilian award of India for exceptional and distinguished service, but still below Bharat Ratna.Padma Shri: The fourth highest civilian award, given for distinguished service, and therefore definitely not the highest civilian honour.Common Pitfalls:Some students mix up civilian awards with military gallantry decorations and may mistakenly think that Param Vir Chakra is the highest award in all categories. Others confuse the relative positions of the three Padma awards. Remember that when a question specifically asks for the highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna is the only correct answer.Final Answer:Bharat Ratna is the highest civilian award of India, so option D is correct.

Question 8

Which of the following is the highest national award in Indian cinema, given annually by the Government of India for lifetime contribution to Indian cinema?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question is about Indian film honours and asks you to recognise the highest national award in Indian cinema given for lifetime contribution. The award is conferred by the Government of India and is a part of the National Film Awards framework. Awareness of this award is important for general awareness and culture related questions in competitive exams.Given Data / Assumptions:The award is a national level honour related to Indian cinema.It is given annually by the Government of India.The award recognises lifetime contribution to Indian cinema.The options include Ashok Chakra, Dadasaheb Phalke Award, Arjuna Award, Padma Shri, and National Film Award for Best Feature Film.Concept / Approach:The highest official recognition in Indian cinema for lifetime contribution is the Dadasaheb Phalke Award. It is presented as part of the National Film Awards and is considered the top honour in Indian film for an individual artist s lifetime work. The other options are either general civilian awards, a gallantry award, a sports award, or a specific competitive film award for a single movie, not a lifetime achievement citation.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that the Dadasaheb Phalke Award was instituted in 1969 in honour of Dadasaheb Phalke, regarded as the father of Indian cinema.Step 2: Remember that this award is given annually to a film personality for outstanding contribution to the growth and development of Indian cinema over an entire career.Step 3: Compare this description with the options. Ashok Chakra is a peacetime gallantry award, Arjuna Award is for sports, Padma Shri is a general civilian award, and the National Film Award for Best Feature Film is given for one film, not for a lifetime contribution.Step 4: Only the Dadasaheb Phalke Award matches the phrase highest national award in cinema for lifetime contribution.Step 5: Select Dadasaheb Phalke Award as the correct answer.Verification / Alternative check:The Directorate of Film Festivals under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting publishes the list of National Film Awards and describes the Dadasaheb Phalke Award as the highest official recognition in Indian cinema. Standard GK books and exam notes also clearly state that this is the top lifetime achievement honour in Indian films. Comparing this with the descriptions of the other awards confirms that only one option fits the question.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Ashok Chakra: India s highest peacetime gallantry award for acts of valour and self sacrifice, unrelated to cinema.Arjuna Award: A national sports award for consistent outstanding performance in sports, not a film award.Padma Shri: A general civilian award for distinguished service in any field, but not specifically or exclusively the highest award for contribution to cinema.National Film Award for Best Feature Film: A prestigious competitive award for a single film in a given year, not a lifetime achievement honour.Common Pitfalls:Many students confuse the Dadasaheb Phalke Award with the popular and private Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Awards, which are a separate set of honours not given by the Government of India. Others think that a high level civilian award like Padma Shri or Padma Bhushan must be the top recognition in cinema. However, the exam perspective treats the Dadasaheb Phalke Award as the highest national film award for lifetime contribution to Indian cinema.Final Answer:Dadasaheb Phalke Award is the highest national award in Indian cinema for lifetime contribution, so option B is correct.

Question 9

Krishna Sobti is the recipient of the 53rd Jnanpith Award. Which one of the following books was not written by her?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests your knowledge of Indian literature and major literary awards. Krishna Sobti, a celebrated Hindi writer, received the 53rd Jnanpith Award. You are asked to identify which one of the listed books is not authored by her. Such questions require familiarity with the important works of major Indian authors.Given Data / Assumptions:Krishna Sobti is a prominent Hindi novelist and essayist.She received the 53rd Jnanpith Award for her contribution to Indian literature.The options list five book titles: Daar Se Bichhudi, Mitro Marjani, Zindaginama, Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar, and Samay Sargam.Among these titles, exactly one is not written by Krishna Sobti.Concept / Approach:The approach is to recall the major works of Krishna Sobti. She is well known for novels such as Zindaginama, Mitro Marjani, Daar Se Bichhudi, and Samay Sargam. The title Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar, on the other hand, is associated with another author and does not appear in lists of Krishna Sobti s works. Therefore, Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar is the odd one out.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify the books that are certainly written by Krishna Sobti. Standard references associate Zindaginama, Mitro Marjani, Daar Se Bichhudi, and Samay Sargam with her.Step 2: Note that Zindaginama won Krishna Sobti the Sahitya Akademi Award and is one of her most acclaimed novels.Step 3: Recognise Mitro Marjani and Daar Se Bichhudi as important works depicting complex female characters and social realities.Step 4: Samay Sargam is another novel that appears under her bibliography in literary references.Step 5: Check the remaining option, Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar, which is not listed among her works and is attributed to another writer. Hence it must be the book not written by Krishna Sobti.Verification / Alternative check:You can verify this answer by consulting any reliable list of Krishna Sobti s works in a standard literature guide, publisher catalogue, or competitive exam book on Indian authors. These sources consistently list Zindaginama, Mitro Marjani, Daar Se Bichhudi, and Samay Sargam under her name. In contrast, Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar is absent from her bibliography and is associated with a different author, confirming that it is not her book.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Daar Se Bichhudi: A well known novel by Krishna Sobti that explores the life and emotions of its central characters, so it is not the correct choice.Mitro Marjani: One of her most famous works, noted for its bold portrayal of female desire and social norms, so this option is wrong.Zindaginama: A landmark novel that earned her the Sahitya Akademi Award, firmly establishing her literary reputation, therefore it is not the answer.Samay Sargam: Also written by Krishna Sobti and listed in her body of work, so it cannot be the book not written by her.Common Pitfalls:Examinees may be tempted to guess based on how unusual or unfamiliar a title sounds. Another pitfall is not keeping track of lesser known titles by major authors and assuming that any unfamiliar work must be wrong. A better strategy is to positively identify at least two or three titles that you know belong to the author and then eliminate them, which narrows down the choices even if you are not fully sure about every remaining option.Final Answer:Vishw Mithok Sarit Sagar was not written by Krishna Sobti, so option D is correct.

Question 10

A series of Indian civilian honours is given as Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, Padma Vibhushan. Which award correctly completes this series?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question uses a simple series to test your understanding of the hierarchy of important Indian civilian honours. You are given a sequence of awards Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, Padma Vibhushan and asked to select the award that logically comes next in this ordered list.Given Data / Assumptions:The series lists Indian civilian honours in ascending order of prestige.The sequence given is Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, Padma Vibhushan.You must choose which award should follow this pattern.The options include Bharat Ratna, Ashok Chakra, Sahitya Akademi Award, Arjuna Award, and Padma Shri.Concept / Approach:The key idea is to know the correct order of Indian civilian honours. Among civilian awards, Bharat Ratna is at the top, followed by Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri. However, the series here is written from the lowest to the higher levels: Padma Shri (fourth), Padma Bhushan (third), Padma Vibhushan (second). The next level above Padma Vibhushan is Bharat Ratna, so Bharat Ratna completes the series.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall the four major civilian awards of India: Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri.Step 2: Remember their order of precedence: 1. Bharat Ratna, 2. Padma Vibhushan, 3. Padma Bhushan, 4. Padma Shri.Step 3: Observe the series in the question: Padma Shri, then Padma Bhushan, then Padma Vibhushan. This sequence clearly climbs upwards in this list.Step 4: Since the award higher than Padma Vibhushan is Bharat Ratna, it is the next logical term in the series.Step 5: Choose Bharat Ratna as the correct answer.Verification / Alternative check:You can verify the hierarchy from any standard GK source that lists Indian awards and decorations. Official descriptions and exam oriented notes consistently introduce the civilian awards in this order of seniority. Confirming this order immediately shows that after Padma Vibhushan comes Bharat Ratna, and no other listed option fits that logical pattern.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Ashok Chakra: A peacetime military gallantry award, which belongs to a different category and does not fit into the civilian Padma awards series.Sahitya Akademi Award: A major literary award, but not a national civilian honour in the same hierarchy as the Padma awards.Arjuna Award: A sports award for outstanding performance in sports and games, again outside the civilian honours sequence.Padma Shri: This is the starting term of the series, the lowest among the Padma awards, and repeating it would break the ascending order pattern.Common Pitfalls:Candidates sometimes confuse the ranking of the Padma awards or think that Padma Vibhushan is the highest civilian award. Others mix civilian awards with military and sports awards. Remember that when the series clearly lists the three Padma awards in rising order, the only sensible continuation is Bharat Ratna, which is the country s highest civilian honour.Final Answer:Bharat Ratna is the award that logically completes the series Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, Padma Vibhushan, so option A is correct.

Question 11

Who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015 for the discovery of neutrino oscillations showing that neutrinos have mass?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests your knowledge of recent Nobel Prize winners in physics. It specifically asks about the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics, which was awarded for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, a result that proved neutrinos have mass. You must identify which scientist from the options received this honour.Given Data / Assumptions:The year is 2015.The field is Physics.The prize recognised the discovery of neutrino oscillations and the fact that neutrinos have mass.The options are Hiroshi Amano, Takaaki Kajita, Isamu Akasaki, Makoto Kobayashi, and Shuji Nakamura.Concept / Approach:The Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015 was shared by two scientists, Takaaki Kajita from Japan and Arthur B McDonald from Canada, for their work on neutrino oscillations. Among the listed options, only Takaaki Kajita matches this description and year. The other names are Nobel laureates in physics, but for different discoveries and in different years.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall the official citation for the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics: it was awarded for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass.Step 2: Remember that this prize was shared between Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B McDonald.Step 3: Examine the options. Takaaki Kajita is present, but Arthur B McDonald is not listed.Step 4: Recognise that Hiroshi Amano, Isamu Akasaki, and Shuji Nakamura received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2014 for the invention of efficient blue light emitting diodes, while Makoto Kobayashi was honoured in 2008 for work on symmetry breaking in particle physics.Step 5: Therefore, the only option consistent with the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics for neutrino oscillations is Takaaki Kajita.Verification / Alternative check:The official Nobel Prize website lists Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B McDonald as the 2015 physics laureates for their key contributions to experiments demonstrating neutrino oscillations. Popular science articles and physics news reports from 2015 also highlight their work and mention Kajita by name. Comparing this with information about the other listed scientists confirms that they were associated with other Nobel years or different discoveries.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Hiroshi Amano: Co recipient of the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics for the invention of efficient blue LEDs, not for neutrino oscillations in 2015.Isamu Akasaki: Another 2014 physics laureate for blue LEDs, so he does not match the 2015 prize for neutrinos.Makoto Kobayashi: Awarded the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for work on the origin of broken symmetry that predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks, not for neutrino oscillations.Shuji Nakamura: Along with Akasaki and Amano, received the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics for blue LEDs, not the 2015 prize.Common Pitfalls:Students often confuse nearby years or mix up different Nobel winning discoveries in physics, especially when several Japanese physicists appear among the laureates. Another common error is to recognise a familiar name like Shuji Nakamura or Isamu Akasaki and select it without checking whether the discovery and year match the question. Always tie the name, year, and discovery together when answering Nobel Prize questions.Final Answer:Takaaki Kajita won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015 for the discovery of neutrino oscillations showing that neutrinos have mass, so option B is correct.

Question 12

At the 64th National Film Awards, which film received the award for Best Environment Film including agricultural film?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question is about the 64th National Film Awards and focuses on the category of Best Environment Film, including agricultural film, in the non feature section. You are required to identify which film received this specific award. National Film Awards frequently appear in current affairs and static GK sections of competitive exams.Given Data / Assumptions:The edition is the 64th National Film Awards.The category is Best Environment Film including agricultural film, in the non feature segment.The options include Kaasav, Dashkriya, Ventilator, The Tiger Who Crossed the Line, and Loktak Lairembee.Concept / Approach:The correct approach is to distinguish between feature films and non feature films and to recall which film was awarded specifically as Best Environment Film in the non feature category at the 64th National Film Awards. The documentary The Tiger Who Crossed the Line, directed by Krishnendu Bose, received the National Award for Best Environment Film including agricultural film at that edition. Other listed films won different awards or belong to the feature film category.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that Kaasav is a Marathi feature film that won the award for Best Feature Film at the 64th National Film Awards.Step 2: Note that Dashkriya and Ventilator are also feature films which received other recognitions, such as awards for direction or regional best film.Step 3: Recognise that The Tiger Who Crossed the Line is a documentary dealing with issues related to tigers and human animal conflict, placed in the non feature section.Step 4: Recall that this documentary was explicitly cited as the Best Environment Film including agricultural film at the 64th National Film Awards.Step 5: Loktak Lairembee is a feature film that received the award for Best Film on Environment Conservation or Preservation, which is a different category, so it is not the answer for Best Environment Film including agricultural film.Step 6: Therefore, The Tiger Who Crossed the Line is the correct choice.Verification / Alternative check:Why Other Options Are Wrong:Kaasav: Winner of the Best Feature Film award at the same National Film Awards, but not the Best Environment Film in the non feature category.Dashkriya: A Marathi feature film honoured in a different category, not for Best Environment Film including agricultural film.Ventilator: A Marathi feature film that received awards for direction and other categories, but not the environment film award.Loktak Lairembee: A Manipuri feature film that won the award for Best Film on Environment Conservation or Preservation, which is a separate category from Best Environment Film including agricultural film.Common Pitfalls:Candidates often confuse similar sounding award categories, such as Best Environment Film and Best Film on Environment Conservation, or mix up feature and non feature sections. Another frequent mistake is to select Kaasav simply because it is the most famous winner from that year. Careful reading of the exact category name and distinguishing between documentary and feature films is essential.Final Answer:The Tiger Who Crossed the Line received the award for Best Environment Film including agricultural film at the 64th National Film Awards, so option D is correct.

Question 13

Which of the following awards is given for distinguished service in any field, including service rendered by government servants?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question examines your understanding of the description and purpose of important Indian civilian and national awards. It asks you to pick the award that is given for distinguished service in any field, including service rendered by government servants. This wording is closely associated with one of the Padma awards.Given Data / Assumptions:The focus is on awards associated with distinguished service in any field.The phrase also mentions service rendered by government servants.The options are Ashok Chakra, Dada Saheb Phalke Awards, Arjuna Award, Padma Shri, and None of these.Concept / Approach:Among the options, Padma Shri is known as the fourth highest civilian award of India and is conferred for distinguished service in various fields of activity, including arts, education, social work, public affairs, and other areas. Standard exam explanations often summarise this as distinguished service in any field including service rendered by government servants. The remaining options relate to gallantry, cinema, or sports and do not match this broad civilian service description.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall the brief definition of Padma Shri. It is awarded for distinguished service in any field and is one of the three Padma awards.Step 2: Compare this with Ashok Chakra, which is a peacetime gallantry award, not a general civilian distinction for all fields.Step 3: Note that the Dada Saheb Phalke Award is a lifetime achievement award specifically for contributions to Indian cinema, not for general distinguished service across all fields.Step 4: Recognise that the Arjuna Award is a national sports award for consistent outstanding performance in sports, again not for broad civilian service.Step 5: Conclude that Padma Shri best fits the description given in the question.Verification / Alternative check:Official information on the Padma awards and standard competitive exam notes describe Padma Shri as being conferred for distinguished service in various fields of activity. Many GK summaries explicitly state that it may also recognise service rendered by government servants, though current official rules restrict awards to non serving government personnel except in special cases. Regardless of policy details, the exam pattern associates this description most strongly with Padma Shri.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Ashok Chakra: Highest peacetime gallantry award given for acts of valour and self sacrifice, not for general distinguished service in any field.Dada Saheb Phalke Awards: These recognise lifetime contribution to Indian cinema only and are not broad civilian service awards.Arjuna Award: This is restricted to sportspersons and honours consistent high performance in sports, not distinguished service in all fields.None of these: This would imply that no listed award matches the description, which is incorrect because Padma Shri clearly does.Common Pitfalls:Some candidates confuse the definitions of various Padma awards or think of Arjuna Award as a general honour because it is widely known. Others may misread the question and focus on the word distinguished, assuming it must refer to a higher award like Padma Bhushan or Padma Vibhushan. The key is that the question emphasises service in any field including the possibility of government service, which matches the broad character of Padma Shri as presented in exam oriented GK material.Final Answer:Padma Shri is the award given for distinguished service in any field, including service rendered by government servants, so option D is correct.

Question 14

Which of the following is the highest civilian honour that actor Amitabh Bachchan has received from the Government of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question asks about the highest civilian honour awarded by the Government of India to legendary actor Amitabh Bachchan. Knowing the sequence of awards a prominent personality has received helps connect static GK on awards with popular culture.Given Data / Assumptions:The personality in question is Amitabh Bachchan, one of the most famous actors in Indian cinema.The options are four different civilian awards plus None of these.You must identify the highest civilian honour he has received so far from the Indian government.Concept / Approach:Amitabh Bachchan has been honoured with multiple civilian awards over the years. He first received the Padma Shri, later the Padma Bhushan, and then the Padma Vibhushan. Bharat Ratna is higher than Padma Vibhushan in the civilian awards hierarchy, but as of the context implied by this question, he has not been conferred Bharat Ratna. Therefore, the highest award that he has actually received is Padma Vibhushan.Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Recall that Amitabh Bachchan was awarded the Padma Shri earlier in his career for his contribution to the arts.Step 2: Later, he received the Padma Bhushan, which is a higher civilian award than Padma Shri.Step 3: Subsequently, he was conferred the Padma Vibhushan, which recognises exceptional and distinguished service and ranks above Padma Bhushan.Step 4: There has been no official announcement of Bharat Ratna being awarded to Amitabh Bachchan within the context relevant to this exam question.Step 5: Therefore, among the awards actually received by him, Padma Vibhushan is the highest civilian honour.Verification / Alternative check:Biographical profiles of Amitabh Bachchan and official Padma award lists show the timeline of his honours. They confirm that he has received Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Vibhushan. News reports and government citations explicitly state that Padma Vibhushan is his highest civilian award to date. There is no credible official record of a Bharat Ratna being conferred on him in the context assumed by this question, which confirms that Padma Vibhushan is the correct choice.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Padma Shri: Amitabh Bachchan did receive this award, but it is the lowest in the Padma series and not his highest civilian honour.Padma Bhushan: This is a higher award than Padma Shri and was also conferred on him, but it still ranks below Padma Vibhushan.Bharat Ratna: This is India s highest civilian award, but there is no official record of Amitabh Bachchan receiving it in the context of this question, so it cannot be treated as his highest award here.None of these: This would imply that none of the listed awards correspond to his highest honour, which is incorrect because Padma Vibhushan clearly does.Common Pitfalls:Some candidates may assume that an iconic figure like Amitabh Bachchan must have received Bharat Ratna and choose that option without checking actual data. Others may forget that he was later elevated from Padma Bhushan to Padma Vibhushan. It is important to distinguish between what logically could happen and what has actually been awarded according to official records.Final Answer:Padma Vibhushan is the highest civilian honour that Amitabh Bachchan has received from the Government of India, so option C is correct.

Question 15

Vikas Khanna is an award winning __________ starred Indian chef known internationally for his fine dining restaurant in New York; which word correctly fills the blank to describe the type of star rating he has received?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Vikas Khanna is a globally recognised Indian chef who became famous for his fine dining restaurant Junoon in New York. In the world of food and hospitality, restaurants are often judged by independent rating guides. The most prestigious of these rating systems is the Michelin star system, which is awarded by the Michelin Guide. This question checks whether you connect the phrase Michelin starred with the chef mentioned in the stem and whether you can avoid being distracted by other brand names that sound similar but have nothing to do with restaurant ratings. Given Data / Assumptions:- The chef mentioned is Vikas Khanna, an Indian celebrity chef known internationally.- The sentence refers to him as an award winning blank starred Indian chef.- The options are Apollo, Michelin, Goodyear, Viking, and Zagat.- We assume the question refers to the common expression Michelin starred chef used in food media and exam general knowledge. Concept / Approach:The key concept here is awareness of famous global rating systems. Michelin stars are awarded by the Michelin Guide to restaurants that meet very high standards of food, service, and consistency. Chefs whose restaurants receive one or more Michelin stars are often called Michelin starred chefs. The exam expects you to recall that Vikas Khanna is widely cited as a Michelin starred Indian chef and to link this information to the blank in the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Read the stem carefully and identify the main clue, which is the name Vikas Khanna and the phrase award winning starred Indian chef.Step 2: Recall that Vikas Khanna ran the restaurant Junoon in New York and that it received a Michelin star, giving him the description Michelin starred chef.Step 3: Look at the options and pick the brand that actually operates a formal restaurant star rating system, which is Michelin.Step 4: Confirm that other options like Apollo, Goodyear, Viking, and Zagat do not match the usual expression blank starred chef.Step 5: Conclude that the correct word to fill the blank is Michelin, giving the phrase Michelin starred Indian chef. Verification / Alternative check:A quick mental check is to remember headlines from food and lifestyle magazines that describe him as a Michelin starred Indian chef from New York. Michelin stars are awarded to restaurants, but chefs are popularly described using the same term. None of the other options are used in this way in standard English. Therefore, the answer that fits common usage and standard general knowledge is Michelin. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Apollo is a brand name mainly associated with tyres and hospitals in India and has no global restaurant rating system linked to it.Goodyear is a tyre manufacturer known for tyres and blimps, not for evaluating restaurants or chefs.Viking is usually associated with historical seafarers or a brand of kitchen appliances, but not with star ratings for restaurants.Zagat is a restaurant survey and guide brand, but people are not described as Zagat starred chefs, so it does not match the specific blank starred wording used in the question. Common Pitfalls:A common mistake is to assume any famous brand connected to food or lifestyle might fit the blank and to ignore the exact phrase starred chef. Another pitfall is mixing up general restaurant guides like Zagat with the specific star rating system run by Michelin. Some learners also guess randomly among the options without recalling the specific connection between Vikas Khanna and the Michelin Guide. Final Answer:The correct completion of the sentence is that Vikas Khanna is an award winning Michelin starred Indian chef.

Question 16

At the 61st Filmfare Awards ceremony held in 2016 for Hindi cinema, which of the following films received the prestigious Best Film award?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The Filmfare Awards are among the oldest and most followed film awards in India, celebrating achievements in Hindi cinema. Each year, the Best Film award attracts attention from audiences and aspirants preparing for competitive exams. The 61st Filmfare Awards were held in 2016 to honour films released in 2015. This question asks you to identify which movie among the options received the Best Film award at that specific edition of the ceremony. Given Data / Assumptions:- The edition mentioned is the 61st Filmfare Awards.- The ceremony took place in 2016 but honoured films released in 2015.- The options given are Tubelight, Sultan, Bajirao Mastani, Badlapur, and Neerja.- We assume standard general knowledge about popular award winning Hindi films of that period. Concept / Approach:To answer this question, you must connect award years with film release years and recall which titles won major awards. The 61st Filmfare Awards honoured films like Bajirao Mastani and Piku. Bajirao Mastani, directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali, was a historical romance that received wide critical acclaim and commercial success. It won several major awards that year, including Best Film. Tubelight and Sultan released later and were not even in contention for that particular year. Badlapur and Neerja were acclaimed but did not win the top Best Film trophy at this edition. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Note that the question is about the 61st Filmfare Awards held in 2016.Step 2: Recall the major winners from that year, especially in the Best Film category.Step 3: Recognise that Bajirao Mastani won multiple key awards, including Best Film.Step 4: Eliminate Tubelight and Sultan because they released later and were not a part of that award year.Step 5: Remember that while Badlapur and Neerja were praised, they did not win Best Film at the 61st Filmfare Awards. Verification / Alternative check:A simple cross check is to remember the association of Bajirao Mastani with the 2015 award season, where it also won Best Director and several technical and acting awards. Many exam preparation books and current affairs notes specifically state that Bajirao Mastani won Best Film at the 61st Filmfare Awards. This reinforces that Bajirao Mastani is the correct choice for this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Tubelight released in 2017 and therefore could not have been a contender for the 61st Filmfare Awards honouring 2015 films.Sultan released in 2016 and belonged to a later award season, not the one in question.Badlapur, though critically appreciated, did not secure the Best Film trophy at the 61st Filmfare Awards.Neerja was a widely acclaimed biographical thriller, but its major awards came in a different context, and it did not receive the Best Film award at this particular edition. Common Pitfalls:Candidates often confuse the year of the ceremony with the release year of films and assume that any popular title from around 2016 could have won. Another mistake is to focus only on box office success and not recall which film actually took the jury award. Mixing up Neerja and Bajirao Mastani is also common because both were widely praised, but only Bajirao Mastani won Best Film at the 61st Filmfare Awards. Final Answer:The film that won the Best Film award at the 61st Filmfare Awards held in 2016 is Bajirao Mastani.

Question 17

Which of the following men was honoured with the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak, the second highest gallantry award given to civilians in India for acts of life saving bravery?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:India has several gallantry awards to recognise acts of courage and life saving by civilians. The Jeevan Raksha Padak series honours individuals who risk their own safety to save others in dangerous situations. Within this series, the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak is the second highest distinction. This question tests your awareness of an important contemporary example where a civilian displayed remarkable bravery and received this award, which is often highlighted in current affairs sections of competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions:- The award mentioned is the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak.- It is described as the second highest gallantry award for civilians in India within the Jeevan Raksha Padak series.- The options list the names Salim Gafur Shaikh, Saurabh Sinha, Nihalchand Sodhi, Mahendra Giri, and Ajay Bhatnagar.- We assume familiarity with news reports about bravery during incidents such as attacks on pilgrims or rescue operations. Concept / Approach:The Jeevan Raksha Padak series specifically honours life saving acts such as rescues during attacks, accidents, drowning incidents, or natural disasters. Exam focused news notes frequently mention that bus driver Salim Gafur Shaikh from Gujarat received the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak for saving the lives of many Amarnath pilgrims by driving his bus out of a terrorist ambush. To answer correctly, you need to associate the name of this award with this well reported act of bravery and not confuse it with other individuals who have received different honours. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify that the award in question is a civilian gallantry decoration for saving lives.Step 2: Recall prominent news stories where a civilian received the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak.Step 3: Remember that Salim Gafur Shaikh, a bus driver, was honoured after he saved dozens of Amarnath Yatra pilgrims by driving through gunfire.Step 4: Compare this recollection with the given options and match the name Salim Gafur Shaikh.Step 5: Confirm that the other names are not associated directly with this specific award in exam oriented general knowledge. Verification / Alternative check:As a secondary check, many competitive exam question banks repeat this same question with the same options and consistently mark Salim Gafur Shaikh as the correct answer. Lists of recipients of the Jeevan Raksha Padak awards issued on Republic Day also name him as a recipient of the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak. This confirms that selecting his name is consistent with reliable sources and common exam practice. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Saurabh Sinha is not listed as the recipient of the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak in standard exam current affairs summaries, so choosing him would be an unsupported guess.Nihalchand Sodhi may appear in other contexts related to bravery, but he is not identified as the awardee for this particular decoration in the usual exam material.Mahendra Giri is known in some environmental and conservation contexts, but he is not the civilian gallantry awardee referred to in this question.Ajay Bhatnagar is included only as an additional distractor name and has no widely known connection to the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak in exam level general knowledge. Common Pitfalls:A frequent mistake is to guess based purely on how familiar a name sounds rather than on specific recall from news or study notes. Another error is to confuse this award with other bravery decorations or to mix up different recipients from different years. It is important to link the name of the award, the nature of the act, and the correct individual together rather than relying on partial memory. Final Answer:The man honoured with the Uttam Jeevan Raksha Padak, the second highest gallantry award for civilians, is Salim Gafur Shaikh.

Question 18

Which of the following prizes in India is specifically awarded for outstanding literary work in the Hindi language?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:India has a rich system of national awards that cover sports, gallantry, literature, arts, and many other fields. For competitive exams, it is essential to know which award belongs to which domain. The question focuses on a literary award that recognises excellence in Hindi literature. The aim is to separate awards related to sports, bravery, and general arts from those that specifically reward literary contributions in the Hindi language. Given Data / Assumptions:- The question asks for a prize that is given for literary work.- The options include Arjuna Award, Ashoka Chakra, Vyas Samman, Gita Chopra Award, and Saraswati Samman.- We assume understanding that some of these are gallantry awards, some are sports awards, and some are literary awards. Concept / Approach:The key concept is to map each award to its correct field. Arjuna Award is linked with sports achievements. Ashoka Chakra is a peacetime gallantry award. Gita Chopra Award is a civilian gallantry distinction. Among the options, Vyas Samman is a well known literary award instituted by the K K Birla Foundation for outstanding literary works in Hindi. Saraswati Samman is also literary but covers Indian languages broadly and is not restricted only to Hindi. Since the question asks which prize is given for literary work, especially in a typical honours and awards question bank, Vyas Samman is the intended answer because it is directly and narrowly associated with Hindi literature. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: List each option and recall its category, such as sports, bravery, or literature.Step 2: Identify Arjuna Award as a sports honour, not a literary one.Step 3: Recognise Ashoka Chakra and Gita Chopra Award as gallantry or life saving awards.Step 4: Recall that Vyas Samman is a literary award presented for an outstanding work of Hindi literature by an Indian citizen.Step 5: Note that Saraswati Samman is literary but broader in scope; typical exam keys match this question with Vyas Samman as the specific expected answer. Verification / Alternative check:Many general knowledge books categorise honours and awards into sports awards, civilian awards, and literary awards. Under literary awards, Vyas Samman is clearly listed as a major Hindi literature prize. This confirms that when the question is presented in this pattern, Vyas Samman is the target answer, even though Saraswati Samman is also literary but usually appears in different question patterns. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Arjuna Award is conferred to outstanding sportspersons and has no connection with writing or literature.Ashoka Chakra is a gallantry award for acts of courage away from the battlefield and is unrelated to literary creation.Gita Chopra Award is part of civilian bravery distinctions and honours acts of saving lives, not writing books.Saraswati Samman is a literary award but is aimed at outstanding works in Indian languages in general; the exam question about a prize for literary work in this exact form is standardly keyed to Vyas Samman, which is dedicated to Hindi literature. Common Pitfalls:Many learners quickly see the word Samman and confuse Vyas Samman with Saraswati Samman. Another pitfall is failing to recall that Arjuna Award and Ashoka Chakra are in completely different domains and should be eliminated immediately. To avoid confusion, it is helpful to remember that Vyas is associated with literature and epics, making it easier to link Vyas Samman with literary honours. Final Answer:The prize that is given specifically for outstanding literary work in Hindi is Vyas Samman.

Question 19

To which scientist was the 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine awarded for groundbreaking research on the process of autophagy in cells?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The Nobel Prizes are among the most prestigious international awards, covering Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economic Sciences. Competitive exam questions often ask about recent or important Nobel awardees and their key contributions. In 2016, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine recognised pioneering work on autophagy, a cellular process for degrading and recycling components. This question checks whether you can correctly link that award to the Japanese scientist Yoshinori Ohsumi. Given Data / Assumptions:- The award mentioned is the 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.- Options list David J. Thouless, Yoshinori Ohsumi, J. Michael Kosterlitz, Sir J. Fraser Stoddart, and Jean-Pierre Sauvage.- We assume awareness that different laureates received other Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry the same year. Concept / Approach:The key concept is to match laureates with the correct Nobel categories and year. In 2016, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went solely to Yoshinori Ohsumi for discoveries of mechanisms for autophagy. David J. Thouless and J. Michael Kosterlitz shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with F. Duncan M. Haldane for work on topological phase transitions. Sir J. Fraser Stoddart and Jean-Pierre Sauvage shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Bernard L. Feringa for the design and synthesis of molecular machines. Once you recall these associations, it becomes straightforward to pick the correct name for the medicine category. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify that the required category is Physiology or Medicine, not Physics or Chemistry.Step 2: Recall that autophagy research was highlighted in 2016 and that this work is linked to Japanese biologist Yoshinori Ohsumi.Step 3: Remember that David J. Thouless and J. Michael Kosterlitz are associated with Physics awards.Step 4: Remember that Sir J. Fraser Stoddart and Jean-Pierre Sauvage received Chemistry awards.Step 5: Conclude that among the given options, only Yoshinori Ohsumi fits the 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Verification / Alternative check:A quick revision technique is to memorise Nobel winners year wise with a simple mapping: 2016 Physics for topology, 2016 Chemistry for molecular machines, and 2016 Medicine for autophagy. When you see the word autophagy, it should instantly remind you of Yoshinori Ohsumi. Since the question explicitly mentions the 2016 prize in Physiology or Medicine, this mapping confirms the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong:David J. Thouless is a Nobel laureate in Physics for work on topological phase transitions and not honoured in the Physiology or Medicine category.J. Michael Kosterlitz also received the Physics Nobel in 2016 and has no direct link to autophagy research.Sir J. Fraser Stoddart is a Chemistry laureate recognised for molecular machines and does not match the medicine prize.Jean-Pierre Sauvage is another Chemistry Nobel laureate and, like Stoddart, is incorrectly matched if chosen for this question. Common Pitfalls:One common mistake is to memorise only names and years but not the associated categories, leading to confusion between Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine laureates. Another pitfall is guessing based on how familiar a name sounds rather than recalling the specific field of research, such as autophagy. To avoid these issues, link each laureate to a key phrase like autophagy, topology, or molecular machines. Final Answer:The 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Yoshinori Ohsumi for his discoveries of mechanisms for autophagy.

Question 20

Which of the following presidents was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for efforts to end the long running civil war in Colombia?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The Nobel Peace Prize recognises individuals and organisations that have made significant contributions toward peace, conflict resolution, and human rights. In 2016, the prize went to a serving president who worked to end a decades long civil war in his country. This question asks you to connect that peace process, which involved negotiations with the FARC rebel group in Colombia, to the correct leader, Juan Manuel Santos. Given Data / Assumptions:- The category is the Nobel Peace Prize for the year 2016.- The award was given to a president for efforts to end a civil war in Colombia.- Options include Raffel Korea, Juan Manuel Santos, Donald Trump, Alexander Lukashenko, and Barack Obama.- We assume basic knowledge of world leaders and major peace agreements reported in the news. Concept / Approach:The core idea is matching key world events with the right leaders and awards. The Colombian government under President Juan Manuel Santos negotiated a peace agreement with the FARC guerrilla group, seeking to bring an end to one of the longest running internal conflicts in modern history. The Nobel Committee recognised his resolute efforts to end the civil war. Barack Obama had already received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, while Donald Trump and Alexander Lukashenko did not receive this award. Raffel Korea is not a recognised spelling of any major president in this context and serves only as a distractor. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Note that the prize is the Nobel Peace Prize 2016, specifically linked to the Colombian peace process.Step 2: Recall that the Colombian president who led talks with FARC was Juan Manuel Santos.Step 3: Eliminate Donald Trump and Alexander Lukashenko because they are associated with different political narratives and have not been Nobel Peace laureates.Step 4: Remember that Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize much earlier, in 2009, not in 2016.Step 5: Conclude that the only option matching the 2016 Peace Prize is Juan Manuel Santos. Verification / Alternative check:A simple revision trick is to list recent Nobel Peace Prize winners: 2014 for child rights, 2016 for Colombia peace process, and so on. Under 2016, you should associate Colombia, FARC negotiations, and the name Juan Manuel Santos. This cross reference confirms that he is the correct choice among the listed presidents. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Raffel Korea appears to be a distractor and is not the documented name of a Nobel Peace Prize winning president related to Colombia. Donald Trump has not received the Nobel Peace Prize, and his presidency is unrelated to the Colombian peace accord mentioned here. Alexander Lukashenko is the long serving leader of Belarus, and there is no Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 or any other year associated with him. Barack Obama did receive a Nobel Peace Prize, but it was in 2009, not 2016, and therefore does not match the year and context asked in the question. Common Pitfalls:One common mistake is confusing the year 2016 with earlier Nobel Peace recognitions or mixing up leaders due to heavy media coverage. Some candidates also wrongly assume that any well known president, such as Donald Trump or Barack Obama, might fit, without thinking about the specific conflict and country mentioned. Always tie the award to the exact event, in this case the peace deal with FARC in Colombia. Final Answer:The president who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for efforts to end the Colombian civil war is Juan Manuel Santos.

Honours and Awards Questions

Questions

Practice smarter