Question 1

Which prestigious international honour did the Geneva based International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons ICAN receive in 2017?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, commonly known by its short form ICAN, is a global civil society coalition dedicated to banning and eliminating nuclear weapons. In 2017 this organisation received a very high profile international peace honour, which became a major news item worldwide. This question tests whether the learner can correctly associate ICAN with the specific award it received in that year. Given Data / Assumptions: - ICAN is described as a Geneva based campaign focused on abolishing nuclear weapons. - The year mentioned is 2017. - The options list several different peace related awards and prizes. - Only one of these awards was actually conferred on ICAN in 2017. - We assume standard Nobel Prize announcements and global news coverage as the source. Concept / Approach: The key point to remember is that ICAN was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 for its efforts to highlight the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons and for its role in promoting a treaty based approach to prohibition. None of the other named awards in the options correspond to that specific widely publicised recognition. The approach is therefore to recall that connection and use elimination for the distractor options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Nobel Peace Prize is announced every year in October and often goes to either individuals or organisations working for peace and disarmament. Step 2: Remember that in 2017, the Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to ICAN for its work on the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and for raising awareness about nuclear humanitarian risks. Step 3: Note that the Albert Einstein Peace Prize, Gandhi Peace Award, Bruno Kreisky Award and Right Livelihood Award are all real honours but are associated with different recipients in different years. Step 4: No widely used reference lists ICAN as the recipient of any of these alternative awards for 2017. Step 5: Therefore, the only correct match between ICAN and a 2017 international peace honour is the Nobel Peace Prize. Verification / Alternative check: An easy cross check is to think of typical one line summaries found in current affairs books, which often state that in 2017 the Nobel Peace Prize went to ICAN for nuclear disarmament efforts. The question itself hints at a global, highly prestigious award, and among the listed options the Nobel Peace Prize clearly occupies that status. None of the other awards had equivalent global headlines that year in relation to nuclear abolition campaigns. This alignment between memory, typical exam notes and the unique prestige of the Nobel Peace Prize confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B (Albert Einstein Peace Prize) is wrong because it is a lesser known award and was not reported as going to ICAN in 2017. Option C (Gandhi Peace Award) is wrong because that honour is normally associated with different peace and social justice activists and not with ICAN that year. Option D (Bruno Kreisky Award) is wrong because this Austrian human rights award has had other recipients and is not linked with ICAN in 2017. Option E (Right Livelihood Award) is wrong because although it is sometimes called an alternative Nobel, it did not go to ICAN in that particular year. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to be confused by the presence of many differently named peace awards and to pick one at random. Another pitfall is thinking that ICAN might have received a less known peace award instead of the Nobel, perhaps due to incomplete revision of Nobel winners. Candidates may also confuse ICAN with past disarmament laureates such as the International Campaign to Ban Landmines or the International Atomic Energy Agency. Thorough revision of recent Nobel Peace Prize winners year wise is the best way to avoid these mistakes. Final Answer: The Geneva based International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons ICAN received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017.

Question 2

Who were the Indian winners of the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award, often called the Asian Nobel Prize?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Ramon Magsaysay Award is often described as the Asian equivalent of the Nobel Prize. It honours individuals and organisations for integrity, courage and service to the people of Asia. In 2018, two Indians were selected for this prestigious award, and this question asks you to identify that pair from the options given. Such questions are common in current affairs and general studies exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is the Ramon Magsaysay Award for the year 2018. - The focus is specifically on the Indian winners. - The options include pairs of names, some Indian and some foreign, related to different peace and human rights honours. - We assume the official Ramon Magsaysay Foundation announcements as the reference. - Only one pair corresponds to the real Indian awardees for 2018. Concept / Approach: In 2018, two Indians received the Ramon Magsaysay Award. Bharat Vatwani, a psychiatrist, was recognised for his work in rescuing, treating and reuniting mentally ill homeless people with their families. Sonam Wangchuk, an education reformer from Ladakh, was honoured for his innovative work in education and community based problem solving. Remembering this pair and eliminating other distractor pairs is the straightforward approach to solve the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award notes in current affairs usually highlight two Indian names together, namely Bharat Vatwani and Sonam Wangchuk. Step 2: Recognise that Kailash Satyarthi is associated with the Nobel Peace Prize 2014 and Arvind Kejriwal is a political leader, and this pair does not match the 2018 Magsaysay list. Step 3: Bhuwan Ribhu and Asmita Satyarthi are connected to child rights activism but are not recorded as Ramon Magsaysay Award winners for 2018. Step 4: Nadia Murad and Juan Manuel Santos are global figures linked to the Nobel Peace Prize in different years rather than the Asian award being asked here. Step 5: Aruna Roy and Medha Patkar are famous Indian activists but not the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay laureates. Step 6: Therefore, Bharat Vatwani and Sonam Wangchuk is the only pair that correctly matches the 2018 Indian winners. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification is to picture the common one line summary in exam guides: in 2018, the Ramon Magsaysay Award went to the Indian winners Bharat Vatwani and Sonam Wangchuk for their work in mental health and education respectively. The award is often mentioned alongside brief descriptions of their contributions, which helps distinguish them clearly from other prominent activists and politicians. As no other pair in the options fits this description, this independent memory check confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B (Kailash Satyarthi and Arvind Kejriwal) is wrong because Satyarthi is mainly linked to the Nobel Peace Prize and Kejriwal is known as a political leader, not as a Magsaysay awardee in 2018. Option C (Bhuwan Ribhu and Asmita Satyarthi) is wrong because although they work in child rights, they are not recorded as Ramon Magsaysay Award recipients for that year. Option D (Nadia Murad and Juan Manuel Santos) is wrong because they are Nobel Peace Prize laureates from outside India, not Indian Magsaysay awardees. Option E (Aruna Roy and Medha Patkar) is wrong because these Indian activists have received other honours but were not the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award winners. Common Pitfalls: The most common mistake is confusing different peace and public service awards, for example mixing up Nobel Peace Prize winners with Ramon Magsaysay laureates. Another pitfall is to choose a very famous activist pair without paying attention to the exact year mentioned. Some learners also assume that any well known social activist from India must have received the Magsaysay Award, which is not true. A focused revision of award winners by year and category greatly reduces such confusion. Final Answer: The Indian winners of the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award were Bharat Vatwani and Sonam Wangchuk.

Question 3

Which bank received the Rajbhasha Kirti Award for outstanding performance in implementing the Official Language Policy in 2017 to 2018?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Rajbhasha Kirti Award is a prestigious recognition given by the Government of India for excellence in the implementation of the Official Language Policy, especially the promotion and effective use of Hindi in official work. Banks and public sector institutions often feature in such awards. This question asks which bank received this honour for outstanding performance during the year 2017 to 2018. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is specifically the Rajbhasha Kirti Award. - The time period is 2017 to 2018. - The options list major Indian banks from the public sector space. - Only one of these banks was singled out for outstanding implementation of the Official Language Policy in that period. - We assume the official Rajbhasha awards list and related government releases as reference. Concept / Approach: The approach is to recall which bank was repeatedly mentioned in current affairs summaries as the Rajbhasha Kirti Award recipient for that year. In many such summaries, Punjab National Bank is highlighted for winning the Hindi implementation award for outstanding work in promoting Hindi as the official language in its operations. The other banks listed are important but did not receive this specific recognition during 2017 to 2018. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the list of banks provided in the options and note that all five are well known public sector banks. Step 2: Recall that current affairs notes on official language awards mentioned Punjab National Bank as a recipient of the Rajbhasha Kirti Award for the period 2017 to 2018. Step 3: Recognise that Union Bank of India, Indian Bank, State Bank of India and Bank of Baroda have each received different awards and recognitions, but not this specific one in that year. Step 4: Since the question asks for the bank that bagged the Hindi implementation award for outstanding performance, and Punjab National Bank is the only one linked to that description, it must be the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: As a cross check, one can think of the context in which this question often appears. Many exam oriented magazines and monthly digests include a one line note that Punjab National Bank received the Rajbhasha Kirti Award for improving and promoting Hindi usage in official business. No similar line is regularly associated with the other banks for the same year. This consistent pattern across prep material confirms that Punjab National Bank is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Union Bank of India) is wrong because, although it is an important bank, it was not the one highlighted for this award in 2017 to 2018. Option B (Indian Bank) is wrong because it did not receive this particular Rajbhasha Kirti Award for that year. Option D (State Bank of India) is wrong since it is often associated with other rankings and awards, but not with this specific Hindi implementation award for 2017 to 2018. Option E (Bank of Baroda) is wrong because it is not recorded as the Rajbhasha Kirti Award winner in the period mentioned. Common Pitfalls: Many students simply guess a very large bank such as State Bank of India on the assumption that size and presence guarantee awards, which is not always true. Others may confuse similar sounding awards like Rajbhasha Gaurav or departmental prizes. Another pitfall is not paying attention to the exact year and relying on scattered memory of different years. To avoid these errors, one should maintain a short list of important language and banking awards year wise. Final Answer: For the year 2017 to 2018, the Rajbhasha Kirti Award for outstanding implementation of the Official Language Policy went to Punjab National Bank.

Question 4

Bhumi Pednekar received the Best Actress honour at a Dadasaheb Phalke award ceremony for her performance in which film?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Dadasaheb Phalke themed award ceremonies, including the Dadasaheb Phalke Excellence or similar variants, are popular events that honour contributions to Indian cinema. Bhumi Pednekar, a well known Bollywood actress, received a Best Actress title at such a ceremony for one particular film. This question aims to check whether you can correctly connect that award with the film for which she was recognised. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on Bhumi Pednekar, an Indian film actress. - The award type is a Dadasaheb Phalke related best actress honour. - The options list several films featuring Bhumi Pednekar in key roles. - Only one of these films is directly associated with her Best Actress recognition at the stated ceremony. - We assume common entertainment news summaries and award reports as reference. Concept / Approach: Bhumi Pednekar gained widespread appreciation for her role in the social drama Toilet Ek Prem Katha, where she played the female lead in a story about sanitation, dignity and toilets for women in rural India. At a Dadasaheb Phalke award function, she was honoured as Best Actress for this performance. While she also acted in Dum Laga Ke Haisha, Shubh Mangal Saavdhan, Lust Stories and other films, the specific Best Actress recognition referred to here is tied to Toilet Ek Prem Katha. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the list of films given in the options and confirm that all of them feature Bhumi Pednekar in important roles. Step 2: Recall that Toilet Ek Prem Katha attracted both box office success and awards attention because of its social message and strong performances by Bhumi Pednekar and Akshay Kumar. Step 3: Recognise that Dum Laga Ke Haisha was her debut film which brought her into the spotlight and won critical praise, but the question focuses on a later Best Actress award at a Dadasaheb Phalke event. Step 4: Lust Stories is an anthology film where she appeared in one segment, and Shubh Mangal Saavdhan is another social comedy, but neither is typically quoted as the reason for this specific Best Actress honour. Step 5: Rustom stars Akshay Kumar, and Bhumi Pednekar is not a lead there, so that option can also be excluded for this particular award. Step 6: Therefore, the film that matches her Best Actress recognition at the Dadasaheb Phalke related ceremony is Toilet Ek Prem Katha. Verification / Alternative check: A quick cross check is to recall entertainment news headlines that paired Bhumi Pednekar with Toilet Ek Prem Katha in the context of awards and honours. Many exam oriented current affairs compilations clearly state that she received a Best Actress title at a Dadasaheb Phalke award function for this film. Dum Laga Ke Haisha is remembered more as her breakout performance and for National Film Award recognition of the film itself, not this particular title. This pattern confirms that the correct answer is Toilet Ek Prem Katha. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B (Rustom) is wrong because Bhumi Pednekar is not the lead actress in that film and did not receive a Dadasaheb Phalke Best Actress honour for it. Option C (Dum Laga Ke Haisha) is wrong because although it established her reputation, it is not the film linked with the specific Best Actress award mentioned. Option D (Lust Stories) is wrong because her anthology segment role there is associated with other award nominations rather than this particular title. Option E (Shubh Mangal Saavdhan) is wrong because it is a different social comedy that did not bring her this exact Best Actress recognition. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often confuse which film generated which award, especially when an actor has multiple socially themed hits in a short span of time. Another mistake is to choose the debut film by default, assuming that the first widely known performance must have been the award winner. It is important to link each award question with a specific headline, year and film, rather than relying on vague impressions about popularity or critical acclaim. Final Answer: Bhumi Pednekar received the Best Actress honour at a Dadasaheb Phalke award ceremony for her performance in Toilet Ek Prem Katha.

Question 5

Who won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress at the 2016 Oscars ceremony?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Academy Awards, commonly called the Oscars, are among the most followed film awards in the world. The Best Supporting Actress category often features strong performances in significant films, and questions about winners by year are common in general knowledge and film awareness sections. This question asks for the winner of the Best Supporting Actress award at the 2016 Oscars ceremony. Given Data / Assumptions: - The year in focus is the 2016 Oscars ceremony, which corresponds to the 88th Academy Awards. - The category is Best Supporting Actress. - The options list actresses who have all received Oscar nominations or awards at various times. - Only one of them actually won in this specific category and year. - We assume official Academy Awards winners lists as the reference. Concept / Approach: At the 2016 Oscars, Alicia Vikander won the Best Supporting Actress award for her performance in the film The Danish Girl. The other actresses listed were either nominees in that year, winners in different categories or winners in other years. The approach is to recall this specific pairing of Alicia Vikander, The Danish Girl and the 2016 ceremony and then eliminate the distractor options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that The Danish Girl drew significant attention for performances by Eddie Redmayne and Alicia Vikander, with Vikander winning an Oscar for a supporting role. Step 2: Confirm that the year of that win corresponds to the 2016 Oscars (88th Academy Awards). Step 3: Recognise that Jennifer Jason Leigh and Rooney Mara were also nominated around that time, but they did not win the award. Step 4: Kate Winslet is a past Oscar winner for other roles and was nominated again, but she did not take home the supporting actress statue in 2016. Step 5: Viola Davis won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for Fences at the 2017 ceremony, not the 2016 one. Step 6: Therefore, Alicia Vikander is the correct answer for the 2016 Best Supporting Actress category. Verification / Alternative check: Many exam notes summarise the 2016 Oscars by listing Spotlight as Best Picture and Alicia Vikander as Best Supporting Actress for The Danish Girl. This combination is usually presented together, making it easier to remember. Checking the roles associated with other actresses confirms that their Oscar wins either belong to other categories or different years, reinforcing that Alicia Vikander is the correct choice for this particular question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B (Jennifer Jason Leigh) is wrong because although she was nominated, she did not win the award in 2016. Option C (Rooney Mara) is wrong because she was a nominee but not the final winner for this category and year. Option D (Kate Winslet) is wrong because her Oscar win as Best Actress for a different film came earlier, and she did not win the 2016 supporting actress title. Option E (Viola Davis) is wrong because she won Best Supporting Actress at the 2017 ceremony, not at the 2016 Oscars. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may confuse adjacent years, especially around 2015 to 2017, when many strong performances by actresses were honoured. Another common pitfall is to remember that Viola Davis won a supporting actress award and incorrectly assign it to 2016. Some students also mix up nominees and winners. To avoid such mistakes, it helps to make a small year wise table of Oscar winners in the key categories, at least for the last decade. Final Answer: At the 2016 Oscars, the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress was won by Alicia Vikander.

Question 6

Which film won the Best Picture award at the 90th Academy Awards also known as the 2018 Oscars?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The 90th Academy Awards, commonly called the 2018 Oscars, honoured films released in the preceding year. The Best Picture category is the highest profile award at the ceremony, and questions about its winner are routine in current affairs and film related general knowledge. This question asks which movie received the Best Picture award at that 90th Oscar ceremony. Given Data / Assumptions: - The edition is the 90th Academy Awards, corresponding to the 2018 Oscars. - The category is Best Picture. - The options list several Oscar nominated films from that season. - Only one of these films actually received the Best Picture award. - We assume official Academy Awards winners lists as the reference. Concept / Approach: At the 90th Academy Awards, the fantasy romantic drama The Shape of Water directed by Guillermo del Toro won the Best Picture award. Other strong contenders that year included Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri, Get Out and others, but they won in different categories. Therefore, the approach is to identify The Shape of Water as the Best Picture winner and treat the remaining films as distractors. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the main narrative of the 2018 Oscars emphasised The Shape of Water as the leading winner, taking home Best Picture and Best Director among other awards. Step 2: Recognise that Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri picked up acting awards but did not win Best Picture. Step 3: Remember that Get Out received strong attention and won Best Original Screenplay, but again not the Best Picture trophy. Step 4: Phantom Thread was an acclaimed period drama with nominations but not the winner in this category. Step 5: Coco is the animated feature that won Best Animated Feature Film and Best Original Song, not Best Picture. Step 6: Therefore, among the options, The Shape of Water is the film that correctly matches the Best Picture award at the 90th Academy Awards. Verification / Alternative check: A simple verification is to recall the pattern of recent Best Picture winners: Spotlight in 2016, Moonlight in 2017 and The Shape of Water in 2018. This three year sequence is often quoted together in various exam guides. Within that sequence, The Shape of Water is clearly labelled as the Best Picture winner for the 90th Oscars. Since none of the other listed films fit that specific place in the timeline, the answer is confirmed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Phantom Thread) is wrong because although it was nominated for Best Picture, it did not win the title. Option B (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri) is wrong because it received awards for acting but failed to secure Best Picture. Option D (Coco) is wrong because it won in the animated and song categories, not in the top category of Best Picture. Option E (Get Out) is wrong because it won for Best Original Screenplay only and is not listed as Best Picture winner. Common Pitfalls: A common pitfall is mixing up nominees and winners, especially when several nominated films become highly discussed. Another mistake is to confuse different years and assume that a critically praised title like Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri or Get Out must have won Best Picture. Some students also misremember Coco as Best Picture because it was extremely popular. Keeping a short chronological list of Best Picture winners is the most reliable way to avoid such confusion. Final Answer: At the 90th Academy Awards in 2018, the Best Picture award was won by The Shape of Water.

Question 7

Who was honoured with Banga Bibhushan, the highest civilian award of West Bengal, in the year 2018?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Banga Bibhushan is the highest civilian award conferred by the Government of West Bengal to honour outstanding contributions in various fields such as arts, culture and public service. In 2018, this honour was given to a legendary figure from the world of Indian music. This question checks your ability to recall exactly who received that distinction in that year. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is Banga Bibhushan, the top civilian honour of West Bengal. - The year in focus is 2018. - The options list famous personalities strongly associated with West Bengal or with Indian art and culture. - Only one of these names was chosen for Banga Bibhushan in 2018. - We assume official state government announcements and news reports as the reference. Concept / Approach: In 2018, the Government of West Bengal conferred Banga Bibhushan on playback legend Asha Bhosle for her lifetime contribution to Indian music. The other names in the list are also distinguished artists and intellectuals but either received the award in other years or received different honours. The approach is to remember the 2018 list and pick Asha Bhosle as the correct answer while ruling out the others. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the names provided and recognise that all of them are high profile cultural figures with strong connections to Bengal or Indian arts. Step 2: Recall that media reports in 2018 specifically highlighted Asha Bhosle receiving Banga Bibhushan for her long and influential singing career. Step 3: Understand that Aparna Sen, Victor Banerjee and Soumitra Chatterjee are acclaimed film personalities, and Amartya Sen is a Nobel laureate economist, but none of them match the 2018 Banga Bibhushan citation. Step 4: Check memory of state level awards in West Bengal and confirm that Asha Bhosle was the central figure in the 2018 honours list. Step 5: Therefore, the correct choice for this question is Asha Bhosle. Verification / Alternative check: Exam oriented current affairs capsules often include a short line stating that in 2018 the West Bengal government honoured Asha Bhosle with Banga Bibhushan. She is also frequently mentioned alongside lists of non Bengali artists who have received recognition from the state. Since none of the other options are typically paired with Banga Bibhushan 2018 in such notes, this cross check supports the conclusion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Aparna Sen) is wrong because although she is an award winning director and actress, she is not the 2018 Banga Bibhushan recipient named in this question. Option B (Victor Banerjee) is wrong because he is a renowned actor but not the person honoured with Banga Bibhushan in 2018. Option C (Soumitra Chatterjee) is wrong because this legendary actor received other honours, and his Banga Bibhushan recognition belongs to a different context, not the year mentioned here. Option E (Amartya Sen) is wrong because the Nobel laureate is associated with other state and national recognitions and is not the Banga Bibhushan recipient for 2018. Common Pitfalls: One pitfall is to assume that because Banga Bibhushan is a West Bengal honour it must go primarily to Bengali film personalities, leading some candidates to choose Aparna Sen or Soumitra Chatterjee without checking the year. Another mistake is to confuse Banga Bibhushan with other titles such as Banga Bhushan or with national level awards. To avoid such errors, it is good practice to revise state honours along with the specific year and field of the recipient. Final Answer: In 2018, the Banga Bibhushan award was conferred on Asha Bhosle.

Question 8

Which film won the Best Picture award at the 2017 Oscar Awards when the mix up with La La Land occurred?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The 2017 Oscar Awards became famous for a dramatic on stage mix up, when La La Land was first announced as Best Picture by mistake and then the correction was made. The real winner, however, is a key fact tested in many exams and quizzes. This question asks which film actually received the Best Picture award at that 2017 ceremony. Given Data / Assumptions: - The event is the 2017 Oscar Awards, which correspond to the 89th Academy Awards. - The category is Best Picture. - The options list several acclaimed films from that awards season. - Only one of them was the true Best Picture winner after the envelope error was corrected. - We assume official Academy records and wide media coverage as reference. Concept / Approach: The famous incident is that La La Land was mistakenly announced as Best Picture before the error was discovered. The crew of La La Land had already come on stage when it was clarified that Moonlight was the actual winner. Therefore, even though La La Land appears attractive as an option, the correct Best Picture winner for the 2017 Oscars was Moonlight. The approach is to recall this widely reported correction and select Moonlight while discarding the other nominees. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the 2017 Oscars ended with a memorable confusion where the presenters read out La La Land for Best Picture. Step 2: Remember that within minutes the mistake was corrected on stage and it was announced that Moonlight was in fact the real Best Picture winner. Step 3: Arrival, Manchester by the Sea and Hacksaw Ridge were strong contenders and winners in other categories, but none of them were awarded Best Picture. Step 4: La La Land, despite winning several awards including Best Director and Best Actress, did not receive the Best Picture title. Step 5: Moonlight, a coming of age drama about identity and struggle, is officially listed as the Best Picture winner for the 2017 Oscars. Step 6: Therefore, the correct answer is Moonlight. Verification / Alternative check: A quick cross check is to think about how the incident is usually described in news and exam notes: Moonlight wins Best Picture after La La Land is mistakenly announced. This phrasing appears repeatedly, making it easy to remember the winner correctly. Academy official lists also clearly show Moonlight as the Best Picture winner for that year. As the other films are recorded only as nominees or winners in different categories, this confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (La La Land) is wrong because, despite being announced once by mistake, it is not the final or official Best Picture winner. Option B (Arrival) is wrong because it received nominations and technical awards but not the top award. Option D (Manchester by the Sea) is wrong because it won acting and writing awards, not Best Picture. Option E (Hacksaw Ridge) is wrong because it secured technical awards but failed to achieve Best Picture. Common Pitfalls: The biggest pitfall is to be misled by the memory of La La Land being announced on stage and to forget that this result was corrected. Some candidates also confuse the 2017 and 2018 ceremonies, mixing up Moonlight and The Shape of Water. Another mistake is to guess based on critical praise alone. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to remember the short timeline: Spotlight in 2016, Moonlight in 2017 and The Shape of Water in 2018 as successive Best Picture winners. Final Answer: The film that actually won the Best Picture award at the 2017 Oscars was Moonlight.

Question 9

Which of the following is not a gallantry medal awarded for bravery in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: India has several military decorations for acts of bravery and gallantry, both in war and in peace time, along with separate civilian and sports related awards. This question tests whether you can clearly distinguish between gallantry medals and other types of honours. You must identify which option is not a gallantry medal awarded for bravery. Given Data / Assumptions: - The options list well known Indian awards and decorations. - Some are dedicated gallantry medals for the armed forces or paramilitary personnel. - One is a sports honour not connected with gallantry. - The task is to pick the award that does not belong to the category of gallantry medals. - We assume official lists of Indian military and civilian awards as reference. Concept / Approach: Gallantry medals in India include Param Vir Chakra, Ashok Chakra, Shaurya Chakra and Kirti Chakra among others. They are conferred for acts of exceptional bravery either in the face of the enemy or in situations not involving direct combat. In contrast, the Arjuna Award is a sports award given to athletes for consistent outstanding performance. The correct approach is to identify Arjuna Award as unrelated to gallantry and select it as the answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Param Vir Chakra is India's highest military decoration for wartime bravery, clearly a gallantry medal. Step 2: Ashok Chakra is India's highest peacetime gallantry award, again firmly in the gallantry category. Step 3: Shaurya Chakra is a gallantry award given for valour, courageous action or self sacrifice away from the battlefield but still involving great risk. Step 4: Kirti Chakra is another high level decoration for courage and gallant actions, especially in peacetime. Step 5: Arjuna Award, on the other hand, is a sports award presented to athletes for outstanding performance over time and has nothing to do with acts of military or civil gallantry. Step 6: Therefore, Arjuna Award is the only option that is not a gallantry medal. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by recalling the categories in which these awards are usually discussed. Param Vir Chakra, Ashok Chakra, Kirti Chakra and Shaurya Chakra appear in lists of gallantry medals and are often tied to stories of military or police bravery. The Arjuna Award appears exclusively in sports related chapters and is also grouped with honours like the Khel Ratna and Dronacharya Award. Since Arjuna Award belongs to a completely different group, this confirms it as the odd one out. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Ashok Chakra) is wrong as the answer because it is a gallantry award given for peacetime bravery of the highest order. Option C (Param Vir Chakra) is wrong because it is the highest wartime military decoration in India. Option D (Shaurya Chakra) is wrong because it is a clearly defined gallantry medal for boldness and courage beyond the call of duty. Option E (Kirti Chakra) is wrong because it is another recognised gallantry award, ranking just below Ashok Chakra. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse sports awards with military honours because both categories appear under headings like national awards. Another common mistake is to think that any award with a heroic sounding name, such as Arjuna, must be related to bravery. In reality, the Arjuna Award is purely for sporting excellence. To avoid such confusion, it helps to classify awards into groups in your notes, such as gallantry, civilian honours, sports and cultural awards. Final Answer: The award that is not a gallantry medal is the Arjuna Award.

Question 10

Who among the following received the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award for the year 2018?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award, which was later renamed but is historically known by this title, is the highest sporting honour in India. For the year 2018, the award was shared between two outstanding Indian sportspersons from different disciplines. This question asks you to identify that correct pair from the options given. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna for the year 2018. - The options include individual names and pairs of prominent athletes. - In that year, the award was conferred jointly, not to a single person. - We assume the official National Sports Awards list as reference. - Only one option correctly reflects both names together as they appear in that list. Concept / Approach: In the 2018 National Sports Awards, the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna was jointly awarded to Indian cricket captain Virat Kohli and weightlifter Saikhom Mirabai Chanu. The approach to solving this question is to recall that it was a shared award and to identify the option that mentions both of them together. Any option that names only Virat Kohli or that pairs him with a wrong second name must be rejected. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Virat Kohli, as India's cricket captain, and S. Mirabai Chanu, as a world champion weightlifter, were the headline names associated with the 2018 Khel Ratna. Step 2: Option A lists only Virat Kohli, which is incomplete because the award that year was shared. Step 3: Option B lists both S. Mirabai Chanu and Virat Kohli together, matching the official announcement. Step 4: Neeraj Chopra and Hima Das are celebrated athletes but are associated with other honours and did not receive the Khel Ratna in 2018. Step 5: P. V. Sindhu and Sakshi Malik are earlier Olympic medal winners linked with Khel Ratna in a previous period, not with this specific year. Step 6: Therefore, S. Mirabai Chanu and Virat Kohli is the correct pair. Verification / Alternative check: A good cross check is to remember that exam guides often present a small table showing joint Khel Ratna awards. In that table, 2018 is clearly associated with Virat Kohli and S. Mirabai Chanu. Other tables show that Neeraj Chopra or Hima Das received Arjuna Awards or later honours. Since only option B reproduces the exact pair from 2018, this confirms it as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Virat Kohli) is wrong because it omits S. Mirabai Chanu and thus does not reflect the joint nature of the award in 2018. Option C (Neeraj Chopra) is wrong because he did not receive the Khel Ratna in that year. Option D (Hima Das and Neeraj Chopra) is wrong because neither athlete was listed as a Khel Ratna recipient for 2018, even though they were recognised with other awards. Option E (P. V. Sindhu and Sakshi Malik) is wrong because their Khel Ratna recognition belongs to an earlier period connected to the Rio Olympics, not to the 2018 award year mentioned here. Common Pitfalls: Students may remember that Virat Kohli received the Khel Ratna but forget that he shared it with S. Mirabai Chanu, leading them to choose only his name. Another common mistake is to assume that other track and field stars such as Neeraj Chopra or Hima Das must have already received the Khel Ratna in that year. To avoid such errors, one should revise joint award years carefully and notice which combinations of names appear together in official lists. Final Answer: For the year 2018, the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award was jointly given to S. Mirabai Chanu and Virat Kohli.

Question 11

Who was the first person of Indian origin to win a Pulitzer Prize?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Pulitzer Prize is one of the most prestigious awards in journalism and letters. Several persons of Indian origin have received it over the decades. This question asks specifically about the first person of Indian origin to win a Pulitzer Prize, which is an important fact in both general knowledge and modern Indian history of journalism. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on the first Indian or Indian origin person to become a Pulitzer Prize winner. - The options list writers and journalists of Indian origin who have won or been associated with the prize. - Only one of them holds the distinction of being the first to receive it. - We assume official Pulitzer records and standard reference works as the base. - The task is to match each name with the timeline of Pulitzer recognition. Concept / Approach: Gobind Behari Lal, an Indian American journalist, shared the 1937 Pulitzer Prize for Reporting for his coverage of science at the Harvard University tercentenary. This makes him the first person of Indian origin to win a Pulitzer. Other names in the list such as Vijay Seshadri, Jhumpa Lahiri and Geeta Anand are later winners in literature or journalism, while Arundhati Roy is a Booker Prize winner, not a Pulitzer laureate. The approach is to recall this chronological fact and select Gobind Behari Lal. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the names in the options and identify which of them have known Pulitzer connections. Step 2: Recall that Gobind Behari Lal won a Pulitzer Prize for Reporting in 1937, well before the other Indian origin laureates on the list. Step 3: Remember that Jhumpa Lahiri won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction for her collection Interpreter of Maladies many decades later. Step 4: Vijay Seshadri is a later Pulitzer winning poet, and Geeta Anand is a Pulitzer winning journalist, both contemporary figures whose wins came long after 1937. Step 5: Arundhati Roy is famous for winning the Booker Prize for The God of Small Things, not the Pulitzer. Step 6: As Gobind Behari Lal's win in 1937 clearly precedes all others, he is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Many exam guides and history of journalism summaries clearly state that Gobind Behari Lal was the first person of Indian origin to receive a Pulitzer Prize. They often highlight that he worked as a science journalist in the United States and shared the prize with other reporters. Later Indian origin winners like Jhumpa Lahiri and Vijay Seshadri are mentioned under separate headings for literature. Since the timeline is unambiguous, this cross check confirms that Gobind Behari Lal is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Arundhati Roy) is wrong because she is associated with the Booker Prize, not the Pulitzer Prize. Option C (Vijay Seshadri) is wrong because although he won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, his win is much later than Gobind Behari Lal's 1937 award. Option D (Jhumpa Lahiri) is wrong because she became a Pulitzer winner for fiction decades after Gobind Behari Lal. Option E (Geeta Anand) is wrong because her Pulitzer in journalism also belongs to a later era and does not make her the first Indian origin laureate. Common Pitfalls: The main pitfall is to focus only on recent names like Jhumpa Lahiri or Vijay Seshadri and forget earlier generations of Indian origin journalists. Another error is to confuse the Pulitzer Prize with the Booker Prize or other literary awards. Exam candidates sometimes select Arundhati Roy simply because her name is strongly associated with a major international literary prize. To avoid this confusion, it is important to link each prize to its earliest Indian origin winner and remember that story clearly. Final Answer: The first person of Indian origin to win a Pulitzer Prize was Gobind Behari Lal.

Question 12

The Gujral Doctrine is associated with which of the following broad policy ideas?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Gujral Doctrine refers to a set of foreign policy principles articulated by former Prime Minister Inder Kumar Gujral when he was India's External Affairs Minister and later Prime Minister. These principles guided India's approach towards its immediate neighbours in South Asia. This question checks whether you understand the central idea that underlies the doctrine. Given Data / Assumptions: - The term Gujral Doctrine is linked specifically to foreign policy and regional relations. - The options offer different policy goals, some internal and some external. - Only one option correctly captures the essence of the doctrine. - We assume standard political science and international relations sources as reference. - The question requires conceptual understanding rather than numerical data. Concept / Approach: The Gujral Doctrine emphasised building trust, goodwill and closer cooperation between India and its neighbours through unilateral gestures, non reciprocity for smaller neighbours and peaceful resolution of disputes. It is not directly about domestic security, Naxal areas or food policy. The correct conceptual summary is that the doctrine relates to building trust between India and its neighbours and shaping a friendlier regional environment. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that I. K. Gujral outlined a five point doctrine focusing on relations with immediate neighbours like Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and others. Step 2: The doctrine emphasised unilateral concessions by India, non interference, respect for sovereignty and the idea that India should not insist on reciprocity from smaller neighbours. Step 3: These points clearly belong to the field of foreign policy and regional diplomacy, not to internal security or sector specific policies. Step 4: Option A, about building trust between India and its neighbours, matches this overall idea directly. Step 5: Options B and C talk about insurgent groups and Naxal dominated areas, which are internal security issues, not the focus of the Gujral Doctrine. Step 6: Option D deals with food security and Option E with global nuclear disarmament, neither of which describe the core of the doctrine. Step 7: Therefore, the correct answer is building trust between India and its neighbours. Verification / Alternative check: Political science and civil services preparation material usually define the Gujral Doctrine in one line as a set of principles to build trust and better relations with India's neighbours, including unilateral concessions and focus on mutual confidence. These notes seldom mention food security or domestic counter insurgency in connection with this doctrine. Since option A reproduces this idea accurately, it is confirmed as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B (Initiate dialogue with all insurgent groups in India) is wrong because it describes an internal security approach, not a foreign policy doctrine targeting neighbouring states. Option C (Undertake development projects in Naxal dominated areas) is wrong because it relates to internal development policy, mainly in affected districts within India. Option D (Ensure national food security) is wrong since food security is a separate policy area and not the focus of the Gujral Doctrine. Option E (Promote global nuclear disarmament) is wrong because although India supports disarmament, the Gujral Doctrine is specifically about regional relations in South Asia. Common Pitfalls: A common pitfall is to treat the word doctrine as a generic label and associate it with any major policy area such as internal security, food or energy. Students also sometimes confuse different doctrines in Indian foreign policy like the Gujral Doctrine and later neighbourhood policies. To avoid such confusion, it is important to remember that the Gujral Doctrine is explicitly framed as a set of principles aimed at building trust and cooperation with neighbouring countries. Final Answer: The Gujral Doctrine is primarily associated with the idea to build trust between India and its neighbours.

Question 13

Who was awarded the Dronacharya Award 2016 in the Swimming Lifetime category?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Dronacharya Award is India's highest recognition for sports coaches. It honours those who have produced outstanding sportspersons and contributed significantly to the development of their sport. Special lifetime categories recognise long term contributions. This question asks who received the Dronacharya Award in 2016 specifically in the Swimming Lifetime category. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is the Dronacharya Award for the year 2016. - The category is Swimming Lifetime, which indicates a lifetime contribution to coaching in swimming. - The options list names of well known coaches from different sports. - Only one of them is the swimming coach honoured in this category. - We assume the official National Sports Awards notification as reference. Concept / Approach: According to the 2016 National Sports Awards list, the Dronacharya Award in the Swimming Lifetime category was conferred on coach S. Pradeep Kumar. He is known for training many national and international level swimmers over decades. Other coaches in the options are connected with different sports such as cricket, boxing or athletics and received recognition in different categories. The approach is to remember this specific pairing and choose Shri S. Pradeep Kumar as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the key identifiers in the question are the year 2016 and the sport swimming with a lifetime tag. Step 2: Recall that coach S. Pradeep Kumar is widely known as a leading Indian swimming coach and has been associated with Dronacharya recognition. Step 3: Confirm that in the 2016 list, he was honoured in the Swimming Lifetime category. Step 4: Identify that Raj Kumar Sharma is associated with cricket coaching, Sagar Mal Dhayal with boxing, and Nagapuri Ramesh with athletics coaching. Step 5: Mahavir Singh is connected with wrestling, again a different discipline from swimming. Step 6: As only S. Pradeep Kumar fits both the sport and the lifetime category for that year, he is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification is to recall how exam summaries present the 2016 Dronacharya Awards: they list multiple names and sports, but for swimming with lifetime contribution, they consistently mention S. Pradeep Kumar. Power point style notes and PDF lists of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports confirm the same. Since none of the other names align with swimming lifetime in 2016, the answer is validated. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Shri Raj Kumar Sharma) is wrong because he is known as a cricket coach and was honoured under cricket, not swimming. Option B (Shri Sagar Mal Dhayal) is wrong because he is associated with boxing coaching and a different award category. Option D (Shri Nagapuri Ramesh) is wrong because he is an athletics coach and his Dronacharya recognition is tied to that sport. Option E (Shri Mahavir Singh) is wrong because he is linked with wrestling and not the swimming lifetime category for 2016. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes memorise Dronacharya awardees by name but not by sport, leading them to confuse which coach belongs to which discipline. Another pitfall is to ignore the word lifetime and to choose any coach of swimming mentioned in generic lists. To avoid this, students should revise Dronacharya winners with sports and year clearly tabulated, paying special attention to lifetime awards that are separate from regular categories. Final Answer: The Dronacharya Award 2016 in the Swimming Lifetime category was given to Shri S. Pradeep Kumar.

Question 14

Who among the following was recently honoured with the Indian of the Year award by a branding and business excellence organisation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Several private organisations and branding agencies in India confer titles such as Indian of the Year to recognise achievements in different fields. One such honour in the field of literature and inspiration was given by a branding and business excellence organisation to a popular contemporary Indian author. This question asks you to identify that author from the options given. Given Data / Assumptions: - The award is titled Indian of the Year. - It is associated with a branding or business excellence organisation rather than the government. - The options list individuals from different fields, including sports and literature. - Only one of them is widely reported as receiving this Indian of the Year title in a literary and inspirational context. - We assume media coverage and award citations as reference. Concept / Approach: Popular novelist and motivational writer Preeti or Preety Shenoy has been honoured as Indian of the Year by a branding and business excellence organisation for her impact as one of India's top selling women authors. Other names in the options are associated with different domains or recognitions. The approach is to link the Indian of the Year citation with her public profile and book based influence and to select her name accordingly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the names and identify which of them are known as authors or thought leaders in the literary space. Step 2: Recognise that Preety Shenoy is a widely read Indian author, often featured in lists of top selling Indian women writers. Step 3: Recall that news coverage has highlighted her receiving an Indian of the Year honour from a reputed branding company for her inspirational writing and impact on readers. Step 4: Note that Sunita Rani is associated more with athletics, Dhiraj Singh and Abhishek Kumar are not widely linked with this specific award, and Mahesh Muralidhar is better known in the context of a different international recognition. Step 5: As only Preety Shenoy matches the description of an Indian of the Year recipient in this context, she is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A cross check can be done by recalling one line notes in current affairs compilations which state that writer Preeti or Preety Shenoy was honoured with the Indian of the Year award by a branding organisation, citing her influence and popularity. None of the other options appear in similar notes or are connected with this particular title. This consistent association between her name and the award makes the answer clear. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (Sunita Rani) is wrong because she is an athlete and is not reported as receiving this specific Indian of the Year honour. Option B (Dhiraj Singh) is wrong because he does not match the profile of a widely known Indian of the Year awardee in this branding context. Option D (Abhishek Kumar) is wrong as there is no strong link between this name and the familiar Indian of the Year award from a branding firm. Option E (Mahesh Muralidhar) is wrong because he is recognised in different domains, including human trafficking work and international awards, not this particular title. Common Pitfalls: Because the phrase Indian of the Year is used by different media houses and organisations, students sometimes confuse one award with another and may think of television or news channel based awards rather than this branding and literature oriented honour. Another pitfall is to pick a name that sounds more familiar from sports instead of recalling the literary context. To avoid such mistakes, it is helpful to associate this particular Indian of the Year title with a bestselling author rather than with politics or sport. Final Answer: The person honoured with the Indian of the Year award in this branding and literary context is Preety Shenoy.

Question 15

Which one of the following famous Indian temples received the UNESCO Asia–Pacific Award of Merit in 2017 for its cultural heritage conservation efforts?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The question tests awareness of important international recognition received by Indian monuments, in particular a UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit given in 2017 for outstanding cultural heritage conservation. Such awards highlight best practice in restoration and protection of historic structures, and they are regularly asked in competitive examinations as part of current affairs and general knowledge on Indian heritage. Given Data / Assumptions: The award in focus is the UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit for Cultural Heritage Conservation. The year mentioned is 2017. All four options are prominent Hindu temples located in different parts of India. Only one of these temples actually received this specific UNESCO award in 2017. Concept / Approach:To answer this question, you need to recall which Indian temple was recognised by UNESCO in 2017 for exemplary conservation and restoration work. The Asia Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation honour projects that successfully restore, conserve, and manage heritage structures while respecting their historical character. A simple elimination approach based on known news and static general knowledge about major temple restorations is sufficient here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple at Srirangam in Tamil Nadu underwent a massive restoration and renovation programme in recent years. Step 2: This large scale conservation project was widely reported in the news because it was carried out without damaging the centuries old temple architecture and art. Step 3: In 2017 UNESCO conferred the Asia Pacific Award of Merit for Cultural Heritage Conservation upon this temple project. Step 4: None of the other options, such as Kamakhya Temple in Guwahati, Meenakshi Temple in Madurai, or Kedarnath Temple in Uttarakhand, received this specific UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit in 2017. Step 5: Therefore, among the given alternatives, Sri Ranganathaswami Temple, Srirangam is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check:You can verify this fact by checking standard current affairs compilations for 2017 or official notes on UNESCO Asia Pacific Awards. They clearly list Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple at Srirangam as the Award of Merit winner for that year, mainly for the outstanding conservation effort undertaken through a public private partnership model and for maintaining the integrity of the original Dravidian temple complex. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kamakhya Temple, Guwahati is an important Shakti shrine in Assam, but it was not the recipient of the UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit in 2017. Meenakshi Temple, Madurai is a famous temple with rich architecture, yet it did not receive this particular UNESCO conservation award in the specified year. Kedarnath Temple, Kedarnath is a major pilgrimage site in Uttarakhand, and although it has seen reconstruction after floods, it was not honoured with this UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit in 2017. Common Pitfalls:A common mistake is to select a very famous or visually grand temple like Meenakshi or Kedarnath based purely on popularity rather than on actual award related facts. Another error is to confuse the UNESCO World Heritage List, which includes sites like temples, forts, and natural areas, with the separate UNESCO Asia Pacific Awards for Conservation that recognise specific restoration projects. Reading questions quickly and assuming that any well known temple must be the answer often leads to incorrect choices. Final Answer:The temple that received the UNESCO Asia Pacific Award of Merit in 2017 for cultural heritage conservation is Sri Ranganathaswami Temple, Srirangam.

Question 16

Who among the following Indian chefs was honoured with the Padma Shri award in 2017 specifically for his outstanding contribution in the field of culinary arts?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question checks your knowledge of recent civilian honours, especially the Padma awards, and the increasing recognition given to professionals from non traditional fields such as culinary arts. Knowing which chef received the Padma Shri in 2017 for culinary contribution is a typical example of current affairs based on awards that feature in many government and banking examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: The award in focus is the Padma Shri, the fourth highest civilian award in India. The year is 2017. The field mentioned is culinary, that is, professional cooking and food related contributions. All options are well known Indian celebrity chefs. Concept / Approach:Padma awards are conferred each year on the eve of Republic Day and widely covered in news. To answer this question, you must recall which chef from television and restaurant fame was recognised with the Padma Shri in 2017 for culinary excellence. Since all four names are familiar, elimination based on known achievements and media coverage becomes important. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Sanjeev Kapoor is one of the earliest and most famous Indian television chefs, associated with the long running show Khana Khazana and with his own food channel. Step 2: In 2017, he was in the news for being included in the official Padma awards list and later receiving the Padma Shri for his contribution to culinary arts. Step 3: Vikas Khanna, Ranveer Brar, and Kunal Kapur are also popular chefs, but they did not receive the Padma Shri in 2017. Step 4: Therefore the only option that matches the award, year, and field correctly is Sanjeev Kapoor. Verification / Alternative check:You can cross check this answer by referring to the official Padma awards list for 2017 or to reliable news portals. They clearly mention Sanjeev Kapoor as a Padma Shri awardee that year in the category linked to culinary work, highlighting his impact on Indian cuisine, television shows, books, and promotion of Indian food globally. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vikas Khanna is a Michelin starred Indian chef based in the United States, but he did not receive the Padma Shri in 2017. Ranveer Brar is a popular chef and television host, yet the Padma Shri for culinary contribution in 2017 was not conferred on him. Kunal Kapur is a noted chef and food show host, but he was not part of the 2017 Padma Shri awardees list in the culinary field. Common Pitfalls:Many aspirants simply pick any famous chef they like or have seen recently on television and ignore the specific year mentioned in the question. Another pitfall is mixing up various honours, such as television awards or international recognitions, with national civilian awards like the Padma series. Careful reading of both the year and the wording related to the award category helps avoid these mistakes. Final Answer:The chef who was awarded the Padma Shri in 2017 for his contribution to culinary arts is Sanjeev Kapoor.

Question 17

Who among the following film personalities received The Asian Awards 2017 for outstanding achievement in cinema for his remarkable contribution to films?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question checks awareness of global honours given to Indian or South Asian cinema personalities. The Asian Awards are prestigious international awards that recognise excellence in various fields including business, sports, and cinema. In 2017, a veteran Indian actor was honoured for outstanding achievement in cinema, and the exam expects you to identify him from the options. Given Data / Assumptions: The award is The Asian Awards 2017. The specific category is outstanding achievement in cinema. All options are names associated with film and television. Only one of these was the actual award recipient in that category and year. Concept / Approach:The key is to link the year 2017 with news reports about tributes and posthumous honours given to a legendary Indian actor. The Asian Awards that year highlighted a life long contribution to cinema. Some of the options, like Kunal Nayyar, are more associated with television, while Om Puri is a widely respected actor acclaimed for his work in Indian and international films. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Om Puri passed away in early 2017 and received several tributes for his decades long career in films. Step 2: At the 2017 edition of The Asian Awards, he was honoured with the award for outstanding achievement in cinema in recognition of his significant impact on both Indian and world cinema. Step 3: Kunal Nayyar is best known for his role in an American sitcom, Vishal Bhardwaj is an acclaimed Indian director, and Zeishan Quadri is a writer and actor, but none of them were named as the 2017 recipient for outstanding achievement in cinema at The Asian Awards. Step 4: Therefore, the correct answer is Om Puri. Verification / Alternative check:Exam oriented current affairs notes and reports about the 2017 Asian Awards clearly mention that Om Puri was recognised posthumously for outstanding achievement in cinema. These sources list his name alongside other category winners, which confirms that this recognition was specifically given to him in that year. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kunal Nayyar received honours related to television work but he was not the 2017 Asian Awards outstanding achievement in cinema winner. Vishal Bhardwaj is a distinguished filmmaker and composer, however he did not receive this particular award in 2017. Zeishan Quadri is known as a writer and actor connected to a few notable films, but he was not the recipient of the 2017 Asian Award for outstanding achievement in cinema. Common Pitfalls:Students may confuse different international award platforms or misremember categories, assuming that any well known director or actor could have received the honour. Another common mistake is mixing this award with Indian film award ceremonies. To avoid such errors, it is useful to associate each important award with at least one clear keyword, such as Om Puri with the 2017 Asian Awards tribute for cinema. Final Answer:The 2017 Asian Award for outstanding achievement in cinema was given to Om Puri.

Question 18

Who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for resolute efforts to end a long standing civil war in his country?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The Nobel Peace Prize is among the most prestigious international honours and questions about its recipients frequently appear in general knowledge sections. The 2016 award drew global attention because it recognised a political leader who worked to end a civil war that had lasted for more than fifty years. This question asks you to connect that description with the correct name. Given Data / Assumptions: The prize is the Nobel Peace Prize. The year is 2016. The reason is efforts to end a long civil war in the leader's own country. All options are well known figures linked to humanitarian or peace related work. Concept / Approach:To answer, you should recall key facts about Nobel Peace Prize winners and their main contributions. In 2014, the prize went to Kailash Satyarthi and Malala Yousafzai for work on children's rights and education. By contrast, 2016 is associated with peace talks in Colombia led by President Juan Manuel Santos, aiming to end a long conflict with the FARC rebels. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that Henry Dunant was one of the first Nobel Peace Prize winners in 1901 and is not connected with recent events. Step 2: Kailash Satyarthi and Malala Yousafzai jointly received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014 for campaigns related to child labour and girls education. Step 3: In 2016, the Nobel Committee honoured Juan Manuel Santos, the President of Colombia, for his persistent efforts to reach a peace agreement to end the Colombian civil war. Step 4: Therefore, the only option that matches the year 2016 and the description about ending a civil war is Juan Manuel Santos. Verification / Alternative check:The official Nobel Prize website and standard year wise lists of Nobel laureates clearly state that Juan Manuel Santos received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016. The citation emphasises his resolute efforts to bring the conflict in Colombia to an end and to promote reconciliation, which directly matches the wording in this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Henry Dunant was a co recipient of the very first Nobel Peace Prize in 1901 for founding the Red Cross and helping build the basis for international humanitarian law, not for a 2016 peace agreement. Kailash Satyarthi is an Indian child rights activist who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014, not 2016. Malala Yousefzai, better known as Malala Yousafzai, is an education activist from Pakistan and shared the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize with Kailash Satyarthi. Common Pitfalls:Candidates often remember famous winners but mix up the years, especially between closely spaced awards. Another pitfall is ignoring the specific description in the stem and selecting a familiar name like Malala or Kailash simply because they are well known. Reading the year and the reason carefully is essential to match the correct laureate with the correct prize year. Final Answer:The Nobel Peace Prize for 2016 was awarded to Juan Manuel Santos.

Question 19

Who among the following children was honoured with the Sanjay Chopra Award in 2016 under the National Bravery Awards for an act of exceptional courage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The National Bravery Awards honour children who display exceptional courage and presence of mind in difficult situations. Within these awards, specific categories such as the Sanjay Chopra Award carry special significance. This question tests whether you can identify which child received the Sanjay Chopra Award in 2016 for a widely reported act of bravery. Given Data / Assumptions: The award mentioned is the Sanjay Chopra Award, a part of the National Bravery Awards for children. The year specified is 2016. Four names of brave children are given as options. Only one of these was officially announced as the Sanjay Chopra Award recipient for that year. Concept / Approach:The key is to recall the brave act that received wide media coverage. Arjun Singh from Uttarakhand was recognised for fighting off a tiger to save his mother, an act that captured national attention. While other children also received bravery awards for different acts, the specific Sanjay Chopra Award for 2016 is associated with Arjun Singh. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Abhinash Mishra, Aromal SM, and Srawanand Saha are names connected with bravery awards in different years or categories, but not the Sanjay Chopra Award in 2016. Step 2: Arjun Singh is noted for his remarkable courage when he fought a tiger to protect his mother in a village in Uttarakhand. Step 3: The Indian Council for Child Welfare selected Arjun Singh for the Sanjay Chopra Award in the 2016 National Bravery Awards list. Step 4: Therefore, Arjun Singh is the correct option among the four names provided. Verification / Alternative check:Newspaper reports and official press releases on the National Bravery Awards for the Republic Day celebrations of 2016 clearly state that Arjun Singh received the Sanjay Chopra Award. They describe how he showed fearless determination during the tiger attack, which confirms that this recognition belongs to him and not to the other children listed in the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Abhinash Mishra may be associated with bravery awards or other honours, but he was not named as the Sanjay Chopra Award recipient in 2016. Aromal SM is mentioned in relation to other National Bravery honours, but his recognition does not correspond to the specific Sanjay Chopra Award for 2016. Srawanand Saha is another child mentioned in bravery award contexts, yet he did not receive the Sanjay Chopra Award in the year indicated in the question. Common Pitfalls:Candidates often remember some of the names from lists of bravery awardees but fail to connect the correct name with the specific sub category like the Sanjay Chopra Award. Another common mistake is relying on guesswork based on how familiar the name sounds rather than on recalled facts. Developing a habit of associating each award sub category with at least one key example helps improve accuracy in these questions. Final Answer:The child who received the Sanjay Chopra Award in 2016 is Arjun Singh.

Question 20

Which one of the following Indian gallantry awards is specifically classified as a peacetime gallantry award?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:India has a structured system of gallantry awards, some of which are associated with wartime operations and others with acts of bravery during peacetime. Competitive exams frequently ask you to distinguish between peacetime and wartime honours. This question focuses on identifying which award among the options is recognised as a peacetime gallantry award. Given Data / Assumptions: The context is Indian gallantry awards. You must identify a peacetime gallantry award. Options include Shaurya Chakra, Vir Chakra, Yudh Seva Medal, and Param Vir Chakra. Exactly one of these is purely a peacetime gallantry decoration. Concept / Approach:India recognises bravery through different sets of awards. Param Vir Chakra and Vir Chakra are primarily associated with wartime gallantry in the presence of the enemy. Yudh Seva Medal is related to distinguished service during war or conflict situations. In contrast, Ashoka Chakra, Kirti Chakra, and Shaurya Chakra are classified as peacetime gallantry awards, given for courageous acts away from the battlefield. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify Param Vir Chakra as the highest wartime gallantry award, conferred for the most conspicuous bravery in the face of the enemy. Step 2: Recognise Vir Chakra as a wartime decoration for acts of gallantry in the presence of the enemy, lower than Param Vir Chakra but still combat linked. Step 3: Understand that Yudh Seva Medal is awarded for distinguished service of a high order in war, conflict, or hostilities and is not primarily a gallantry award for peacetime acts. Step 4: Recall that Shaurya Chakra is a peacetime gallantry award, given for an act of gallantry otherwise than in the face of the enemy, often for counter insurgency operations or rescue acts in non war situations. Step 5: Therefore, Shaurya Chakra is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check:Official descriptions from government publications and standard defence general knowledge books clearly group Ashoka Chakra, Kirti Chakra, and Shaurya Chakra together as peacetime gallantry awards. Param Vir Chakra and Vir Chakra are grouped under wartime honours, and Yudh Seva Medal is a distinguished service medal linked with operations. This classification confirms that only Shaurya Chakra in the given list is a peacetime gallantry award. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vir Chakra is a wartime gallantry award for bravery in the presence of the enemy and is not categorised as a peacetime honour. Yudh Seva Medal is awarded for distinguished service during war and conflict situations, not specifically for peacetime gallantry. Param Vir Chakra is India's highest wartime gallantry award and therefore does not fit the requirement of a peacetime gallantry award. Common Pitfalls:A frequent error is to assume that any award with the word Chakra or with a military sounding name must be peacetime or wartime without checking the official classification. Another pitfall is mixing up Yudh Seva Medal, which focuses on distinguished service, with gallantry decorations. To avoid confusion, it helps to remember the two main groups clearly: Param Vir Chakra, Maha Vir Chakra, and Vir Chakra for wartime, and Ashoka Chakra, Kirti Chakra, and Shaurya Chakra for peacetime bravery. Final Answer:The gallantry award that is specifically a peacetime gallantry award is Shaurya Chakra.

Honours and Awards Questions

Questions

Practice smarter