FPGA programming technologies: Among SRAM, flash, and antifuse configuration technologies used in FPGAs, which is the most commonly encountered in mainstream devices?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: SRAM

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
FPGAs store configuration defining their logic and routing. Three major technologies have been used: volatile SRAM, non-volatile flash, and one-time programmable antifuse. Selecting a technology involves trade-offs among configuration method, security, power-up behavior, and reprogrammability.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • SRAM-based FPGAs require configuration at power-up (from external memory) but are fully reprogrammable.
  • Flash-based FPGAs store configuration on-chip, enabling instant-on behavior.
  • Antifuse FPGAs are one-time programmable with very robust, secure interconnects.


Concept / Approach:
Across decades of mainstream FPGA production, large vendors have predominantly shipped SRAM-configured devices due to flexibility, scalability, and compatibility with advanced nodes and complex features (DSPs, RAMs, SerDes). Flash and antifuse continue to serve valuable niches (instant-on, radiation-hardened, high security), but SRAM dominates overall market share.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the pros/cons of each technology.Relate pros to market adoption: reprogrammability and process portability favor SRAM.Confirm typical vendor portfolios (large LUT counts, advanced IP) are SRAM-based.Conclude SRAM is the most common technology.


Verification / Alternative check:
Survey major FPGA product families; most high-density parts are SRAM-configured, while flash/antifuse target specialized applications.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

flash / antifuse / SRAM and flash: Important but not the predominant technology across mainstream, high-density devices.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating “instant-on” with mainstream; overlooking the massive volume of SRAM-based parts in communications and compute markets.


Final Answer:
SRAM

More Questions from Programmable Logic Device

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion