Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Shempa
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We are given two partial chains anchored on Kanika. The question asks for the youngest person, which will be the one forced below two others by direct statements.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Stack the constraints with Kanika as the pivot. Individuals strictly younger than two others become strong candidates for the youngest.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Top chain: Sita > Ila > Kanika.Lower placements: Kanika > Manas and Kanika > Shempa; also Manas > Shempa.Thus overall: Sita > Ila > Kanika > Manas > Shempa.Verification / Alternative check:Any numeric assignment respecting these inequalities retains Shempa at the very bottom; no statement allows anyone to be younger than Shempa.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Misreading “younger than both” as “younger than either,” which would not force Shempa below Manas.
Final Answer:Shempa
Discussion & Comments