Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 31
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
A classic construction uses differences that double each time (powers of two). We locate the single term that disrupts this pattern.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute the intended running totals using powers of two and compare with the given terms.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
If the third increment is +16, the sequence is 1, 5, 13, 29, 61, 125, 253, which is perfectly consistent.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1, 5, 61 match the expected cumulative sums under the power-of-two differences.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming differences grow arbitrarily; check for powers-of-two first in such progressions.
Final Answer:
31 is the wrong term (should be 29).
Discussion & Comments