Statement:\nMost Indians know they have a great heritage, but few would include science within that heritage.\nConclusions:\nI. Many Indians consider science a major part of what makes India’s heritage great.\nII. Many Indians are unaware that India has a great scientific heritage.

Introduction / Context:
The statement contrasts general pride in national heritage with the specific neglect of science as part of that heritage. The key phrase is “few would include science,” which quantifies recognition as small.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Most Indians acknowledge a great heritage.
• Only a small subset includes science in that heritage.

Concept / Approach:
Conclusion I claims that “many” (a large portion) consider science central; this contradicts “few” in the premise. Conclusion II says that many are unaware of India’s scientific heritage; given that only a few include science, it is reasonable that a large remainder does not recognize it—hence II follows.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I: “Few include science” ≠ “many consider science major”; I contradicts the given quantifier → does not follow.2) II: If only a few include science, then many Indians do not recognize the scientific component of heritage → follows.

Verification / Alternative check:
Unless “few” meant “slightly less than half” (which it does not in common reasoning questions), II remains the necessary inference.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Both” fails due to I; “Neither” ignores the explicit “few” language.

Common Pitfalls:
Misreading quantifiers (“few,” “many,” “most”) and treating them as interchangeable.

Final Answer:
Only Conclusion II follows