Analogies – Choose the pair that best completes the relationship. EXPLORE : DISCOVER :: ?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: research : learn

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Analogies test verbal reasoning by asking you to identify the relationship between a given pair and then select a second pair that mirrors the same relationship. Here, EXPLORE leads to the result DISCOVER. We must find a pair in which the first action naturally produces the second outcome.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • EXPLORE is an action.
  • DISCOVER is a typical result or consequence of exploring.
  • We seek an action → outcome pairing of similar strength and direction.


Concept / Approach:
The core pattern is cause-and-effect: performing the first activity tends to yield the second result. The best analogies preserve part of speech, directionality, and semantic strength. We also avoid pairs that are merely synonyms, opposites, categories, or tools without a causal link.


Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Analyze EXPLORE : DISCOVER as action → outcome.2) Evaluate 'research : learn': researching commonly produces learning, so action → outcome fits.3) Check 'read : skim': skimming is a type of reading, not a consequence of it, so the direction is wrong.4) Check 'write : print': printing is not the direct, necessary result of writing; it is a separate process.5) Check 'think : relate': relating is not the standard outcome of thinking; relation is one possible cognitive act.6) Check 'sleep : wake': these are sequential states, not cause-and-effect in the required sense.


Verification / Alternative check:
Replace EXPLORE with RESEARCH and DISCOVER with LEARN in a sentence: 'If you explore, you discover' parallels 'If you research, you learn.' Both are broadly and typically true without forcing exceptions.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • read : skim – Skimming is a subset of reading, not a usual consequence.
  • write : print – Printing is optional and external to writing.
  • think : relate – Not a fixed or defining outcome.
  • sleep : wake – Sequential states rather than action → result.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing subset relationships or temporal sequences with causal outcomes is common. Ensure the first term tends to produce the second, not merely associate with it.


Final Answer:
research : learn

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion