Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: If neither Conclusion I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The aphorism recommends solution-seeking as the best escape route. The conclusions attempt to infer effects on “life” and a requirement to “always have” solutions pre-prepared, neither of which is stated.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The statement suggests an approach once a problem exists; it does not prescribe a state of always carrying solutions (II) nor evaluate a life without problems as “dull” (I). Hence neither conclusion is logically necessary.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify scope: operational advice after a problem appears.2) Exclude emotional or universal quantifications not present (I and II).
Verification / Alternative check:
The advice can be valid regardless of whether life without problems is “dull,” and regardless of pre-existing solutions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option affirming I or II adds content not implied by the aphorism.
Common Pitfalls:
Over-generalizing motivational maxims into universal psychological or logistical claims.
Final Answer:
Neither conclusion follows.
Discussion & Comments