Typical Frequency Range for Satellite Communications Which frequency range best represents the core bands commonly used for satellite communication links?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 1 GHz to 30 GHz

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Commercial and governmental satellite communications predominantly use microwave bands where atmospheric attenuation is manageable and antennas are reasonably sized. Recognizing the typical range guides system design choices for RF front-ends, link budgets, and spectrum planning.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Focus on widely deployed GEO, MEO, and LEO satellite services.
  • Terrestrial propagation losses and rain attenuation considered.
  • Representative, not exhaustive, frequency ranges.


Concept / Approach:

The principal satcom bands include L band (around 1–2 GHz), S band (2–4 GHz), C band (4–8 GHz), X band (7–8/8–12 GHz), Ku band (12–18 GHz), and Ka band (26–40 GHz). The densest activity lies roughly between 1 GHz and 30 GHz, balancing antenna size, bandwidth, and atmospheric effects. Much below 1 GHz, bandwidths are small and allocations are limited; far above 30 GHz, attenuation due to rain and gases grows rapidly (though modern systems increasingly use Q/V bands with careful fade mitigation).


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify classic satcom bands: L, S, C, X, Ku, Ka.2) Map these to the numeric span: approximately 1–30 GHz.3) Conclude that 1 GHz to 30 GHz is the best description among the listed options.


Verification / Alternative check:

Regulatory allocations (e.g., ITU) and operator band plans concentrate in these ranges for uplinks and downlinks.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

kHz/MHz ranges cannot carry high-throughput satellite links with practical antennas; sub-THz ranges are emerging but not the core mainstream today.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing radar bands with satcom bands or assuming extremely high frequencies are the current norm for all services.


Final Answer:

1 GHz to 30 GHz

More Questions from Microwave Communication

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion