Drained Triaxial Compression of Saturated Sand A saturated, cohesionless sand specimen (c′ = 0) fails in a drained triaxial compression test under deviator stress q = (σ1 − σ3) = 3 kgf/cm^2 with cell (confining) pressure σ3 = 1 kgf/cm^2. Estimate the effective friction angle φ′ of the sand.
-
A37°
-
B45°
-
C53°
-
D20°
Answer
Correct Answer: 37°
Explanation
Introduction / Context:In drained triaxial compression of clean sands, the Mohr–Coulomb strength can be represented by σ1/σ3 = (1 + sin φ′) / (1 − sin φ′) when cohesion c′ ≈ 0. Given measured deviator stress and confining pressure, φ′ can be back-calculated, an essential step in geotechnical design for bearing capacity, slope stability, and earth pressure problems.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Confining pressure: σ3 = 1 kgf/cm^2.
- Deviator stress at failure: q = σ1 − σ3 = 3 kgf/cm^2.
- Therefore, σ1 = 4 kgf/cm^2.
- Material: cohesionless sand ⇒ c′ = 0.
Concept / Approach:
For c′ = 0, the triaxial compression failure condition is σ1/σ3 = (1 + sin φ′) / (1 − sin φ′). Solving for sin φ′ with the measured stress ratio yields the effective friction angle φ′.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Compute stress ratio: σ1/σ3 = 4 / 1 = 4.2) Set 4 = (1 + sin φ′) / (1 − sin φ′).3) Cross-multiply: 4 − 4 sin φ′ = 1 + sin φ′ ⇒ 5 sin φ′ = 3.4) sin φ′ = 3/5 = 0.6.5) φ′ = arcsin(0.6) ≈ 36.87°, say 37°.Verification / Alternative check:
Mohr’s circle at failure for these principal stresses will be tangent to a line at angle 45° + φ′/2 to the σ-axis; using φ′ ≈ 37° gives consistent geometry and shear stress at failure.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- 45° and 53°: Reflect much stronger sands or dense states not supported by the measured stress ratio of 4.
- 20°: Far too low for clean sand under drained loading with the stated failure stresses.
Common Pitfalls:
Using total stresses when pore pressures are significant (here test is drained and sand is cohesionless); mixing up q with σ1; rounding errors when converting to degrees.
Final Answer:
37°