For a riveted joint not exposed to weather, what is the recommended distance from the rivet line to the nearest plate edge, expressed as a multiple of the thickness t of the thinner outside plate?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 12 t

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
In plate fabrication with riveted or bolted joints, layout dimensions such as edge distance and pitch are governed by practical fabrication limits and plate buckling considerations. For joints not exposed to weather (i.e., not required to be watertight), the spacing from the rivet line to the plate edge helps prevent edge tearing and local buckling while keeping the connection economical.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Joint type: riveted, not exposed to weather.
  • Parameter: distance from rivet line to the nearest plate edge.
  • Reference thickness: t is the thickness of the thinner outside plate in the joint.


Concept / Approach:
The distance from the line of fasteners to the free edge must be sufficient to limit out-of-plane deformation between the fastener row and the edge and to provide adequate net section for force transfer. Traditional detailing rules specify multiples of plate thickness to maintain stiffness and fabrication tolerance, with a commonly accepted value for non-watertight joints being 12 t.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the joint category: not required to be weather-tight; hence caulking requirements do not govern.Apply standard detailing guidance: edge distance from rivet line to edge = 12 t.Select 12 t from the given choices.


Verification / Alternative check:

Compare with rules for watertight joints, which may prescribe different distances to accommodate caulking and seal integrity.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

6 t / 8 t / 10 t: may be insufficient to prevent local buckling or edge tearing in standard detailing.16 t: conservative but not the common requirement for non-weather joints, potentially uneconomical.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing center-to-edge minimums (margins) with line-to-edge distances specified as multiples of t.Applying watertight-joint criteria to ordinary structural joints unnecessarily increasing plate widths.


Final Answer:

12 t

More Questions from Structural Design Specifications

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion