Estimating Basics – Contingencies, work-charged staff, detailed specs, and market rate Which of the following statements is correct in the context of preparing detailed estimates?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of the above

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:Accurate estimates rely on clear terminology: contingencies, work-charged establishment, detailed specifications, and market rate. Knowing these definitions avoids omissions and mispricing in tenders and DPRs (Detailed Project Reports).

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Standard building works estimate.
  • Need to include non-measurable incidentals, staffing, material requirements, and prevailing rates.

Concept / Approach:Each term has a specific meaning in estimating practice, guiding how costs are grouped and justified in the BOQ and the summary sheet.

Step-by-Step Solution:Contingencies ⇒ provision for unforeseen, incidental expenditure.Work-charged establishment ⇒ staff wages charged directly to the work during execution.Detailed specifications ⇒ technical prescription of material quality, proportion, workmanship, and tests.Market rate ⇒ current open-market procurement price per unit.

Verification / Alternative check:These align with textbook and code definitions used in government estimates and CPWD practice.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • a–d are each correct, so “All of the above” is the correct combined choice.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing contingencies with provisions for price escalation, or misclassifying permanent staff under work-charged establishment, may distort budget lines.

Final Answer:All of the above

More Questions from Estimating and Costing

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion