Home » Logical Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Arguments evaluation (encouraging young entrepreneurs): Should young entrepreneurs be actively encouraged? Assess—(I) Yes: they will aid industrial development, (II) Yes: they will reduce the burden on the employment market—decide which argument(s) are strong on development and labour absorption.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Both I and II are strong

Explanation:


Given data

  • Policy: Encourage young entrepreneurs.
  • I: Leads to industrial development (innovation, investment, productivity).
  • II: Eases pressure on job markets by creating employment.


Concept / Approach
Both arguments present distinct, valid benefits that directly follow from entrepreneurship: output growth and job creation.


Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: Entrepreneurial activity expands industries and services through new firms and products (supports I).Step 2: New and growing firms hire labour, thereby reducing unemployment and underemployment (supports II).Step 3: Since both reasons are relevant and complementary, both are strong.


Verification / Alternative
Economic development literature consistently links entrepreneurship with innovation-led growth and employment multipliers.


Common pitfalls

  • Seeing the two outcomes as mutually exclusive; they often occur together.


Final Answer
Both I and II are strong.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion