Statement:\n“The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it.”\nConclusions:\nI. Your life will be dull if you do not face a problem.\nII. To escape from problems, you should always have some solution with you.

Introduction / Context:
The aphorism states that the best way to “escape” a problem is to solve it. This is a recommendation about method, not a factual survey of all lives or an inventory of ready-made solutions. Our task is to test each conclusion for necessary logical follow-through from the given statement only.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A “problem” is something undesirable that one wishes to escape from.
• Among possible approaches, “solve it” is claimed to be the best way to escape.
• No claims are made about the emotional tone of a problem-free life, nor about carrying pre-packaged solutions.

Concept / Approach:
In statement–conclusion items, a conclusion follows only if it must be true whenever the statement is true. The aphorism elevates solving as the optimal escape but says nothing about (a) how exciting or dull life is without problems, or (b) whether one must always possess a solution beforehand.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Conclusion I claims: “Your life will be dull if you do not face a problem.” The premise does not evaluate the quality of life as dull or exciting. It simply prescribes solving as the best escape route. Thus I does not follow.2) Conclusion II asserts: “You should always have some solution with you.” The statement recommends solving when a problem arises; it does not require a perpetual, ready-made solution. Solutions can be discovered, developed, or chosen at the time. Hence II does not follow.

Verification / Alternative check:
Had the statement claimed “a life without problems is dull,” I would follow. Had it prescribed “carry a solution at all times,” II would follow. Neither is said.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option admitting I or II introduces unstated content about life’s excitement or pre-ownership of solutions. “Either” still wrongly assumes at least one follows.

Common Pitfalls:
Conflating a methodological maxim (“solve it”) with universal claims about lifestyle or preparedness.

Final Answer:
if neither Conclusion I nor II follows