The NHRC is assuming both ; that is why this new system has been made compulsory.
Even able parents may be not willing to pay the increased fee. Hence I can't be assumed. Why are they demonstrating in front of Legislative Council? Clearly, they are assuming II. Hence II is implicit.
DTC authorities are assuming both the assumptions; that is why they have planned so.
I is implicit; that is why the PIOs have maintained the Indian culture even in alien settings. But II is not implicit because a comparison between the two cultures is nowhere hinted at.
Such messages are sent to get control of a problem. II is the implicit problem. I is expected to help in getting control of the problem.
I is not implicit because it implies that value-based voting still prevails, though it does not have too long a future. But the statement clearly suggests that value-based voting is absent. What about Assumption II, which talks of the potential of value-based voting? Well, the only potential the speaker has in mind is that it's a step in the positive direction. But can it undo what has been done ? we don't know.
I is a restatement. But II is implicit because it is on this assumption that the comparison has been made.
Why did the court intervene and direct the state's executive machinery?
I is not implicit. The statement has no relationship to other games. II is implicit because the speaker talks about the consequence only after assuming this.
It is hard to reduce the generalised version to a particular field. Other possibilities may also be considered, such as sanitation problem,-----Hence I is not implicit. II is implicit because it is this that makes the speaker take potshot at metros.
Both are sort of restatements.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.