Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context: Digital clocks in hardware description languages (HDLs) often use frequency division to derive human-time signals from a faster reference. This question tests your understanding of “frequency prescaling” and whether it is used to convert a slow 1 pps source into a faster 60 pps signal.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach: A prescaler divides the input frequency: fout = fin / N. To go from 60 pps to 1 pps, choose N = 60. To go from 1 pps to 60 pps would require frequency multiplication or a different, faster source; division cannot increase frequency.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the goal: obtain 60 pps from 1 pps.Recall prescaler behavior: fout = fin / N, where N ≥ 1.If fin = 1 pps, division can create 1/N pps ≤ 1 pps, never 60 pps.Therefore, the statement that prescaling turns 1 pps into 60 pps is not valid.Verification / Alternative check:
Common digital clock designs divide 60 Hz mains or a high-frequency crystal down to 1 Hz (1 pps), not the other way around.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Correct: Would imply prescaling increases frequency; it does not.Applies only for mains-driven clocks: Source type does not change the divide-only nature of prescaling.Valid only for BCD clocks: Code format (BCD) is unrelated to frequency multiplication.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing dividers (prescalers) with phase-locked loops or numerically controlled oscillators that can multiply.Assuming any “timing block” can arbitrarily change frequency up or down.Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments