Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: One-half of the drill diameter
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Nomenclature in machining differs across processes. In turning, depth of cut is a radial measure; in drilling, the equivalent concept must be referenced to the drill geometry. Consistent definitions are necessary for calculating metal removal rate (MRR) and selecting conditions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In drilling, two cutting lips remove material symmetrically. By analogy with turning, the depth of cut is taken as the radial engagement on one side, which equals half of the drill diameter D/2. This aligns MRR expressions with turning-style formats.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Comparing volumetric removal per revolution (hole cross-sectional area times feed) corroborates the D/2 definition.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Equal to D or double D are geometric exaggerations; one-fourth D does not match conventional definitions; claiming independence from diameter contradicts standardized machining terminology.
Common Pitfalls:
Mixing up feed (axial advance per revolution) with depth of cut (radial engagement); the drill point angle affects chip thickness locally but not the standard definition of depth of cut.
Final Answer:
One-half of the drill diameter
Discussion & Comments